This reverts commit bd7949bcd86633bd4203b2ba6f891aea00fce4d1.
Revert this patch since reviwers have different opinions regarding
the approach in post-commit review.
Will open RFC for further discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132408
Canonicalize GEP of GEP by swapping GEP with some suffix constant indices to the back (and GEP with all constant indices to the back of that), this allows more constant index GEP merging to happen. Exceptions are: If swapping violates use-def relations, or anti-optimizes LICM
For constant indexed GEP of GEP, if they cannot be merged directly, they will be casted to i8* and merged.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125845
This patch extends the load merge/widen in AggressiveInstCombine() to handle reverse load patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135137
(X << Z) / (Y << Z) --> X / Y
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/E5eaxU
This fixes the motivating example from issue #58137,
but it is not the most general transform. We should
probably also convert left-shift in the divisor to
right-shift in the dividend for that, but that exposes
another missed canonicalization for shifts and adds.
This is an extension of the existing min/max+select fold (which already
has a very large number of variations) to allow a vector shuffle because
that's what we have in the motivating example from issue #42100.
A couple of Alive2 checks of variants (I don't know how to generalize
these in Alive):
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/jUFAqT
And verify the PR42100 test:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/3EcASf
It's possible there is some generalization of the fold or a
VectorCombine/SLP answer for the motivating test, but I haven't found a
better/smaller solution yet.
We can also add even more variants here as follow-up patches. For example,
we can have shuffle followed by min/max; we also don't have this
canonicalization or the reverse:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/StHD9f
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134879
Revert rGef89409a59f3b79ae143b33b7d8e6ee6285aa42f "Fix 'unused-lambda-capture' gcc warning. NFCI."
Revert rG926ccfef032d206dcbcdf74ca1e3a9ebf4d1be45 "[SLP] ScalarizationOverheadBuilder - demand all elements for scalarization if the extraction index is unknown / out of bounds"
Revert ScalarizationOverheadBuilder sequence from D134605 - when accumulating extraction costs by Type (instead of specific Value), we are not distinguishing enough when they are coming from the same source or not, and we always just count the cost once. This needs addressing before we can use getScalarizationOverhead properly.
The phase ordering test is the almost unoptimized IR for the example
in issue #42100; it was passed through -mem2reg to reduce obvious
excessive load/store and other noise.
D134879
Instead of accumulating all extraction costs separately and then adjusting for repeated subvector extractions, this patch collects all the extractions and then converts to calls to getScalarizationOverhead to improve the accuracy of the costs.
I'm not entirely satisfied with the getExtractWithExtendCost handling yet - this still just adds all the getExtractWithExtendCost costs together - it really needs to be replaced with a "getScalarizationOverheadWithExtend", but that will require further refactoring first.
This replaces my initial attempt in D124769.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134605
The ArgumentPromotion pass uses Mem2Reg promotion at the end to cutting
down generated `alloca` instructions as well as meaningless `store`s and
this behavior can leave unused (dead) arguments. To eliminate the dead
arguments and therefore let the DeadCodeElimination remove becoming dead
inserted `GEP`s as well as `load`s and `cast`s in the callers, the
DeadArgumentElimination pass should be run after the ArgumentPromotion
one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128830
The bug reported on the [0] has been fixed.
The issue was we have not checked if the global variables that
represent cttz tables was constant.
There is a new negative test added in negative-lower-table-based-cttz.ll
that represents this.
[0] https://reviews.llvm.org/rGdf868edee561eb973edd85ec9df41c67aa0bff6b
SimplifyCFG folds
bool foo() {
if (cond1) return false;
if (cond2) return false;
return true;
}
as
bool foo() {
if (cond1 | cond2) return false
return true;
}
'cond2' is called 'bonus insts' in branch folding since they introduce overhead
since the original CFG could do early exit but the folded CFG always executes
them. SimplifyCFG calculates the costs of 'bonus insts' of a folding a BB into
its predecessor BB which shares the destination. If it is below bonus-inst-threshold,
SimplifyCFG will fold that BB into its predecessor and cond2 will always be executed.
When SimplifyCFG calculates the cost of 'bonus insts', it only consider 'bonus' insts
in the current BB to be considered for folding. This causes issue for unrolled loops
which share destinations, e.g.
bool foo(int *a) {
for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++)
if (a[i] > 0) return false;
return true;
}
After unrolling, it becomes
bool foo(int *a) {
if(a[0]>0) return false
if(a[1]>0) return false;
//...
if(a[31]>0) return false;
return true;
}
SimplifyCFG will merge each BB with its predecessor BB,
and ends up with 32 'bonus insts' which are always executed, which
is much slower than the original CFG.
The root cause is that SimplifyCFG does not consider the
accumulated cost of 'bonus insts' which are folded from
different BB's.
This patch fixes that by introducing a ValueMap to track
costs of 'bonus insts' coming from different BB's into
the same BB, and cuts off if the accumulated cost
exceeds a threshold.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich, Florian Hahn, Nikita Popov, Matt Arsenault
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132408
This was originally part of D133788. There are no visible
regressions. All of the diffs show a large unsigned constant
becoming a small negative constant. This should be better
for analysis (and slightly less compile-time) and codegen.
This reverts commit 053841c5624ca7eacd108a26071d8a1cefe1bebd.
We faced a use-after-free after pushing the D113291, since the
foldSqrt() has a call to eraseFromParent(). The function
should be at the end of the main loop that folds the patterns.
This patch fixes that.
The original commit ( fe1f3cfc2669 ) was reverted because it could
crash / assert when trying to fold a value that was replaced
by a constant. In that case, there might not be an entry for the
constant in the solver yet.
This version adds a check for that possibility along with tests to
exercise that pattern (they used to crash).
Original commit message:
This extends the transform added with D81756 to handle div/rem opcodes.
For example:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/cX6za6
This replicates part of what CVP already does, but the motivating example
from issue #57472 demonstrates a phase ordering problem - we convert
branches to select before CVP runs and miss the transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133198
This reverts commit fe1f3cfc2669aca387a45c8ce615b45c1db50fc6.
It looks like this commit breaks building llvm-test-suite.
To reproduce, run `opt -passes=ipsccp` on the IR below.
@g = internal global i32 256, align 4
define void @test() {
entry:
%0 = load i32, ptr @g, align 4
%div = sdiv i32 %0, undef
ret void
}
This extends the transform added with D81756 to handle div/rem opcodes.
For example:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/cX6za6
This replicates part of what CVP already does, but the motivating example
from issue #57472 demonstrates a phase ordering problem - we convert
branches to select before CVP runs and miss the transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133198
Some arm buildbots are complaining about a phase ordering test failure in unsigned-multiply-overflow-check.ll - I guess this test needs making x86 specific first
This reverts commit b10a341aa5b0b93b9175a8f11efc9a0955ab361e.
This commit exposes the pre-existing https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56503 in some edge cases. Will fix that and then reland this.
The ArgumentPromotion pass uses Mem2Reg promotion at the end to cutting
down generated `alloca` instructions as well as meaningless `store`s and
this behavior can leave unused (dead) arguments. To eliminate the dead
arguments and therefore let the DeadCodeElimination remove becoming dead
inserted `GEP`s as well as `load`s and `cast`s in the callers, the
DeadArgumentElimination pass should be run after the ArgumentPromotion
one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128830
The commit breaks the compiler when a function is used as a function
parameter (hm... for a function from the standard C library?):
```
static float strtof(char *, char *) {}
void a() { strtof(a, 0); }
```
This reverts commit 879f5118fc74657e4a5c4eff6810098e1eed75ac.
Most of our cost model tables have been created assuming cost kind == recip-throughput. But we're starting to see passes wanting to get accurate costs for the other kinds as well. Some of these can be determined procedurally (e.g. codesize by default could just be the split count after type legalization), but others are going to need to be handled in cost tables - this is especially true for x86 which has so many ISA combinations.
I've created a 'CostKindCosts' struct which can hold cost values for the 4 cost kinds, defaulting to -1U for unknown cost, this can be used with the existing CostTblEntryT/CostTableLookup template code. I've also added a [TargetCostKind] accessor to make it much easier to look up individual <Optional> costs.
This just changes the ISD::SELECT costs to check the effect (and also to check that the ISD::SETCC are correctly handled for default/None cost kinds) - the plan would be to slowly extend this and move the CostKindTblEntry type somewhere generic to allow other targets to use it once its matured.
I'm also going to resurrect D103695 so that it can help with latency/codesize/sizelatency coverage testing.
For sizelatency - IIRC the definition was vague to let it be target specific - I've tried to use typical uop counts so they're comparable to MicroOpBufferSize etc.
REAPPLIED: Added early out to prevent getCmpSelInstrCost being used for anything but generic integer/float scalar/vector types - getTypeLegalizationCost can't handle the "exotic" TypeID enums that some passes attempt to get a costs for (aggregates etc.).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132216
Most of our cost model tables have been created assuming cost kind == recip-throughput. But we're starting to see passes wanting to get accurate costs for the other kinds as well. Some of these can be determined procedurally (e.g. codesize by default could just be the split count after type legalization), but others are going to need to be handled in cost tables - this is especially true for x86 which has so many ISA combinations.
I've created a 'CostKindCosts' struct which can hold cost values for the 4 cost kinds, defaulting to -1U for unknown cost, this can be used with the existing CostTblEntryT/CostTableLookup template code. I've also added a [TargetCostKind] accessor to make it much easier to look up individual <Optional> costs.
This just changes the ISD::SELECT costs to check the effect (and also to check that the ISD::SETCC are correctly handled for default/None cost kinds) - the plan would be to slowly extend this and move the CostKindTblEntry type somewhere generic to allow other targets to use it once its matured.
I'm also going to resurrect D103695 so that it can help with latency/codesize/sizelatency coverage testing.
For sizelatency - IIRC the definition was vague to let it be target specific - I've tried to use typical uop counts so they're comparable to MicroOpBufferSize etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132216
The ArgumentPromotion pass uses Mem2Reg promotion at the end to cutting
down generated `alloca` instructions as well as meaningless `store`s and
this behavior can leave unused (dead) arguments. To eliminate the dead
arguments and therefore let the DeadCodeElimination remove becoming dead
inserted `GEP`s as well as `load`s and `cast`s in the callers, the
DeadArgumentElimination pass should be run after the ArgumentPromotion
one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128830
The ArgumentPromotion pass uses Mem2Reg promotion at the end to cutting
down generated `alloca` instructions as well as meaningless `store`s and
this behavior can leave unused (dead) arguments. To eliminate the dead
arguments and therefore let the DeadCodeElimination remove becoming dead
inserted `GEP`s as well as `load`s and `cast`s in the callers, the
DeadArgumentElimination pass should be run after the ArgumentPromotion
one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128830
