Original PR: #130537
Originally reverted due to revert of dependent commit. Relanding with no
changes.
This changes the MemberPointerType representation to use a
NestedNameSpecifier instead of a Type to represent the base class.
Since the qualifiers are always parsed as nested names, there was an
impedance mismatch when converting these back and forth into types, and
this led to issues in preserving sugar.
The nested names are indeed a better match for these, as the differences
which a QualType can represent cannot be expressed syntatically, and
they represent the use case more exactly, being either dependent or
referring to a CXXRecord, unqualified.
This patch also makes the MemberPointerType able to represent sugar for
a {up/downcast}cast conversion of the base class, although for now the
underlying type is canonical, as preserving the sugar up to that point
requires further work.
As usual, includes a few drive-by fixes in order to make use of the
improvements.
Original PR: #130537
Reland after updating lldb too.
This changes the MemberPointerType representation to use a
NestedNameSpecifier instead of a Type to represent the base class.
Since the qualifiers are always parsed as nested names, there was an
impedance mismatch when converting these back and forth into types, and
this led to issues in preserving sugar.
The nested names are indeed a better match for these, as the differences
which a QualType can represent cannot be expressed syntatically, and
they represent the use case more exactly, being either dependent or
referring to a CXXRecord, unqualified.
This patch also makes the MemberPointerType able to represent sugar for
a {up/downcast}cast conversion of the base class, although for now the
underlying type is canonical, as preserving the sugar up to that point
requires further work.
As usual, includes a few drive-by fixes in order to make use of the
improvements.
This changes the MemberPointerType representation to use a
NestedNameSpecifier instead of a Type to represent the class.
Since the qualifiers are always parsed as nested names, there was an
impedance mismatch when converting these back and forth into types, and
this led to issues in preserving sugar.
The nested names are indeed a better match for these, as the differences
which a QualType can represent cannot be expressed syntactically, and it
also represents the use case more exactly, being either dependent or
referring to a CXXRecord, unqualified.
This patch also makes the MemberPointerType able to represent sugar for
a {up/downcast}cast conversion of the base class, although for now the
underlying type is canonical, as preserving the sugar up to that point
requires further work.
As usual, includes a few drive-by fixes in order to make use of the
improvements, and removing some duplications, for example
CheckBaseClassAccess is deduplicated from across SemaAccess and
SemaCast.
Since a68d20e98, we've been calling HandleDelayedAccessCheck() for
concept declarations when the declaration contains invalid member
accesses.
However, a concept declaration is TemplateDecl such that doesn't contain
any TemplatedDecl.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/131530
This patch moves documentation of `Sema` functions from `.cpp` files to `Sema.h` when there was no documentation in the latter, or it can be trivially subsumed. More complicated cases when there's less trivial divergence between documentation attached to declaration and the one attached to implementation are left for a later PR that would require review.
It appears that doxygen can find the documentation for a function defined out-of-line even if it's attached to an implementation, and not declaration. But other tools, e.g. clangd, are not as powerful. So this patch significantly improves autocompletion experience for (at least) clangd-based IDEs.
attempt to fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/12361
Consider this example:
```cpp
class D {
class E{
class F{};
friend void foo(D::E::F& q);
};
friend void foo(D::E::F& q);
};
void foo(D::E::F& q) {}
```
The first friend declaration of foo is correct. After that, the second
friend declaration delayed access checking and set its previous
declaration to be the first one. When doing access checking of `F`(which
is private filed of `E`), we put its canonical declaration(the first
friend declaration) into `EffectiveContext.Functions`. Actually, we are
still checking the first one. This is incorrect due to the delayed
checking.
Creating a new scope to indicate we are parsing a friend declaration and
doing access checking in time.
This patch adds copy/move assignment operator to the class which has user-defined copy/move constructor.
Reviewed By: tahonermann, NoQ, aaronpuchert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150411
Before this patch, initialized class members would have the LifetimeKind
LK_MemInitializer, which does not allow for binding a temporary to a
reference. Binding to a temporary however is allowed in parenthesized
aggregate initialization, even if it leads to a dangling reference. To
fix this, we create a new EntityKind, EK_ParenAggInitMember, which has
LifetimeKind LK_FullExpression.
This patch does *not* attempt to diagnose dangling references as a
result of using this feature.
This patch also refactors TryOrBuildParenListInitialization(...) to
accomodate creating different InitializedEntity objects.
Fixes#61567
[0]: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p0960r3.html
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148274
> Dependent access checks.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53364
We previously ignored dependent access checks to private members.
These are visible only to the `RequiresExprBodyExpr` (through `PerformDependentDiagnositcs`) and not to the individual requirements.
---
> Non-dependent access checks.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53334
Access to members in a non-dependent context would always yield an
invalid expression. When it appears in a requires-expression, then this
is a hard error as this would always result in a substitution failure.
https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.prim.req#general-note-1
> Note 1: If a requires-expression contains invalid types or expressions in its requirements, and it does not appear within the declaration of a templated entity, then the program is ill-formed. — end note]
> If the substitution of template arguments into a requirement would always result in a substitution failure, the program is ill-formed; no diagnostic required.
The main issue here is the delaying of the diagnostics.
Use a `ParsingDeclRAIIObject` creates a separate diagnostic pool for diagnositcs associated to the `RequiresExprBodyDecl`.
This is important because dependent diagnostics should not be leaked/delayed to higher scopes (Eg. inside a template function or in a trailing requires). These dependent diagnostics must be attached to the `DeclContext` of the parameters of `RequiresExpr` (which is the `RequiresExprBodyDecl` in this case).
Non dependent diagnostics, on the other hand, should not delayed and surfaced as hard errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140547
Implement P2128R6 in C++23 mode.
Unlike GCC's implementation, this doesn't try to recover when a user
meant to use a comma expression.
Because the syntax changes meaning in C++23, the patch is *NOT*
implemented as an extension. Instead, declaring an array with not
exactly 1 parameter is an error in older languages modes. There is an
off-by-default extension warning in C++23 mode.
Unlike the standard, we supports default arguments;
Ie, we assume, based on conversations in WG21, that the proposed
resolution to CWG2507 will be accepted.
We allow arrays OpenMP sections and C++23 multidimensional array to
coexist:
[a , b] multi dimensional array
[a : b] open mp section
[a, b: c] // error
The rest of the patch is relatively straight forward: we take care to
support an arbitrary number of arguments everywhere.
This is a pre-patch for adding using-enum support. It breaks out
the shadow decl handling of UsingDecl to a new intermediate base
class, BaseUsingDecl, altering the decl hierarchy to
def BaseUsing : DeclNode<Named, "", 1>;
def Using : DeclNode<BaseUsing>;
def UsingPack : DeclNode<Named>;
def UsingShadow : DeclNode<Named>;
def ConstructorUsingShadow : DeclNode<UsingShadow>;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101777
`TD->getTemplatedDecl()` might not be a DeclContext variant, which can
trigger an assertion inside `isa<>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91380
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 373911
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<RecordType> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 373584
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Currently, protected members from base classes are marked as
inaccessible when completing in derived class. This patch fixes the problem by
setting the naming class correctly when looking up results in base class
according to [11.2.p5].
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, sammccall, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49421
llvm-svn: 337453
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
This broke the Chromium build, see https://crbug.com/813017
> accessibility of a class member.
>
> This fixes PR32898.
>
> rdar://problem/33737747
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36918
llvm-svn: 325335
Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
llvm-svn: 274049
Summary:
This patch fix the scoping of enum literal. They were not resolving
to the right type.
It was not causing any problem as one is a copy of the other one.
The literal in the switch are resolving to Sema.h:5527
```
enum AccessResult {
AR_accessible,
AR_inaccessible,
AR_dependent,
AR_delayed
};
```
Instead of SemaAccess.cpp:27
```
/// A copy of Sema's enum without AR_delayed.
enum AccessResult {
AR_accessible,
AR_inaccessible,
AR_dependent
};
```
This issue was found by a new clang-tidy check (still on-going).
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20773
llvm-svn: 271431
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
There are a few cases where unqualified lookup can find C++ methods.
Unfortunately, none of them seem to have illegal access paths, so I
can't excercise the diagnostic source range code that I am changing
here.
Fixes PR21851, which was a crash on valid.
llvm-svn: 224471
These note diags have the same message and can be unified further but for now
let's just bring them together.
Incidental change: Display a source range in the final attr diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 209728
Summary:
This avoids false positives from -Wmicrosoft when name lookup would
normally succeed in standard C++. This triggered on a common CRTP
pattern in clang, where a derived class would have a private using decl
to pull in members of a dependent base:
class Verifier : InstVisitor<Verifier> {
private:
using InstVisitor<Verifier>::visit;
...
void anything() {
visit(); // warned here
}
};
Real access checks pass here because we're in the context of the
Verifier, but the -Wmicrosoft extension was just looking for the private
access specifier.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2679
llvm-svn: 201019
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
