We haven't implemented 16 bit SGPRs. Currently allow 32-bit SGPRs to be
folded into True16 bit instructions taking 16 bit values. Also use
sgpr_32 when Imm is copied to spgr_lo16 so it could be further folded.
This improves generated code quality.
There are V2S copies between vpgr16 and spgr32 in true16 mode. This is
caused by vgpr16 and sgpr32 both selectable by 16bit src in ISel.
When a V2S copy and its useMI are lowered to VALU, this patch check
1. If the generated new VALU is used by a true16 inst. Add subreg access
if necessary.
2. Legalize the V2S copy by replacing it to subreg_to_reg
an example MIR looks like:
```
%2:sgpr_32 = COPY %1:vgpr_16
%3:sgpr_32 = S_OR_B32 %2:sgpr_32, ...
%4:vgpr_16 = V_ADD_F16_t16 %3:sgpr_32, ...
```
currently lowered to
```
%2:vgpr_32 = COPY %1:vgpr_16
%3:vgpr_32 = V_OR_B32 %2:vgpr_32, ...
%4:vgpr_16 = V_ADD_F16_t16 %3:vgpr_32, ...
```
after this patch
```
%2:vgpr_32 = SUBREG_TO_REG 0, %1:vgpr_16, lo16
%3:vgpr_32 = V_OR_B32 %2:vgpr_32, ...
%4:vgpr_16 = V_ADD_F16_t16 %3.lo16:vgpr_32, ...
```
Added a srl pattern for true16 flow. Changing right shift 16bit to a
reg_sequence
`srl vgpr32, 16 -> reg_sequence (vgpr32.hi16, 0)`
and finally it's lowered to two COPY
`vdst.lo16 = COPY vsrc.hi16`
`vdst.hi16 = COPY 0`
The benefits of this transform is allowing the following pass to
optimize out these copy.
We have a VALU->SGPR->SALU (VALU writing to SGPR and SALU reading from
it). When VALU is issued, it increments internal counter VA_SDST used to
track use of this SGPR. SALU will not issue until VA_SDST is zero, that
is when VALU is finished writing. Therefore, delays added by s_delay_alu
are not needed in this situation.
We have a VALU->SGPR->SALU (VALU writing to SGPR and SALU reading from
it). When VALU is issued, it increments internal counter VA_SDST used to
track use of this SGPR. SALU will not issue until VA_SDST is zero, that
is when VALU is finished writing. Therefore, delays added by s_delay_alu
are not needed in this situation.
Occupancy (i.e., the number of waves per EU) depends, in addition to
register usage, on per-workgroup LDS usage as well as on the range of
possible workgroup sizes. Mirroring the latter, occupancy should
therefore be expressed as a range since different group sizes generally
yield different achievable occupancies.
`getOccupancyWithLocalMemSize` currently returns a scalar occupancy
based on the maximum workgroup size and LDS usage. With respect to the
workgroup size range, this scalar can be the minimum, the maximum, or
neither of the two of the range of achievable occupancies. This commit
fixes the function by making it compute and return the range of
achievable occupancies w.r.t. workgroup size and LDS usage; it also
renames it to `getOccupancyWithWorkGroupSizes` since it is the range of
workgroup sizes that produces the range of achievable occupancies.
Computing the achievable occupancy range is surprisingly involved.
Minimum/maximum workgroup sizes do not necessarily yield maximum/minimum
occupancies i.e., sometimes workgroup sizes inside the range yield the
occupancy bounds. The implementation finds these sizes in constant time;
heavy documentation explains the rationale behind the sometimes
relatively obscure calculations.
As a justifying example, consider a target with 10 waves / EU, 4 EUs/CU,
64-wide waves. Also consider a function with no LDS usage and a flat
workgroup size range of [513,1024].
- A group of 513 items requires 9 waves per group. Only 4 groups made up
of 9 waves each can fit fully on a CU at any given time, for a total of
36 waves on the CU, or 9 per EU. However, filling as much as possible
the remaining 40-36=4 wave slots without decreasing the number of groups
reveals that a larger group of 640 items yields 40 waves on the CU, or
10 per EU.
- Similarly, a group of 1024 items requires 16 waves per group. Only 2
groups made up of 16 waves each can fit fully on a CU ay any given time,
for a total of 32 waves on the CU, or 8 per EU. However, removing as
many waves as possible from the groups without being able to fit another
equal-sized group on the CU reveals that a smaller group of 896 items
yields 28 waves on the CU, or 7 per EU.
Therefore the achievable occupancy range for this function is not [8,9]
as the group size bounds directly yield, but [7,10].
Naturally this change causes a lot of test churn as instruction
scheduling is driven by achievable occupancy estimates. In most unit
tests the flat workgroup size range is the default [1,1024] which,
ignoring potential LDS limitations, would previously produce a scalar
occupancy of 8 (derived from 1024) on a lot of targets, whereas we now
consider the maximum occupancy to be 10 in such cases. Most tests are
updated automatically and checked manually for sanity. I also manually
changed some non-automatically generated assertions when necessary.
Fixes#118220.
Any SGPR read by a VALU can potentially obscure SALU writes to the same
register.
Insert s_wait_alu instructions to mitigate the hazard on affected paths.
Compute a global cache of SGPRs with any VALU reads and use this to
avoid inserting mitigation for SGPRs never accessed by VALUs.
To avoid excessive search when compile time is priority implement
secondary mode where all SALU writes are mitigated.
Co-authored-by: Shilei Tian <shilei.tian@amd.com>
This reverts commit adaff46d087799072438dd744b038e6fd50a2d78.
Drop the -O3 checks from default-attributes.hip. I don't know why they
are different on some bots but reverting this is far too disruptive.
Removing it from the codegen pipeline induces a lot of test churn
because llc is no longer optimizing out implicit arguments to kernels.
Mostly mechanical, but there are some creative test updates. I preferred
to take the changes as-is in tests where the ABI isn't relevant. In
cases where it's more relevant, or the optimize out logic was too
ingrained in the test, I pre-run the optimization. Some cases manually
add attributes to disable inputs.
First, expandFMINIMUM_FMAXIMUM should be a never-fail API. The client
wanted it expanded, and it can always be expanded. This logic was tied
up with what the VectorLegalizer wanted.
Prefer using the min/max opcodes, and unrolling if we don't have a
vselect.
This seems to produce better code in all the changed tests.
