ISD::ADDC, ISD::ADDE, ISD::SUBC and ISD::SUBE are being deprecated,
using ISD::UADDO_CARRY,ISD::USUBO_CARRY instead. Lowering the UADDO,
UADDO_CARRY, USUBO, USUBO_CARRY in the patch.
ISD::ADDC, ISD::ADDE, ISD::SUBC and ISD::SUBE are being deprecated,
using ISD::UADDO_CARRY,ISD::USUBO_CARRY instead. Lowering the UADDO,
UADDO_CARRY, USUBO, USUBO_CARRY in the patch.
Relative to the first attempt, this contains two changes:
First, we only handle the case where one side simplifies to true or
false, instead of calling simplification recursively. The previous
approach would return poison if one operand simplified to poison
(under the equality assumption), which is incorrect.
Second, we do not fold llvm.is.constant in simplifyWithOpReplaced().
We may be assuming that a value is constant, if the equality holds,
but it may not actually be constant. This is nominally just a QoI
issue, but the std::list implementation in libstdc++ relies on the
precise behavior in a way that causes miscompiles.
-----
and/or in logical (select) form benefit from generic simplifications via
simplifyWithOpReplaced(). However, the corresponding fold for plain
and/or currently does not exist.
Similar to selects, there are two general cases for this fold
(illustrated with `and`, but there are `or` conjugates).
The basic case is something like `(a == b) & c`, where the replacement
of a with b or b with a inside c allows it to fold to true or false.
Then the whole operation will fold to either false or `a == b`.
The second case is something like `(a != b) & c`, where the replacement
inside c allows it to fold to false. In that case, the operand can be
replaced with c, because in the case where a == b (and thus the icmp is
false), c itself will already be false.
As the test diffs show, this catches quite a lot of patterns in existing
test coverage. This also obsoletes quite a few existing special-case
and/or of icmp folds we have (e.g. simplifyAndOrOfICmpsWithLimitConst),
but I haven't removed anything as part of this patch in the interest of
risk mitigation.
Fixes#69050.
Fixes#69091.
and/or in logical (select) form benefit from generic simplifications via
simplifyWithOpReplaced(). However, the corresponding fold for plain
and/or currently does not exist.
Similar to selects, there are two general cases for this fold
(illustrated with `and`, but there are `or` conjugates).
The basic case is something like `(a == b) & c`, where the replacement
of a with b or b with a inside c allows it to fold to true or false.
Then the whole operation will fold to either false or `a == b`.
The second case is something like `(a != b) & c`, where the replacement
inside c allows it to fold to false. In that case, the operand can be
replaced with c, because in the case where a == b (and thus the icmp is
false), c itself will already be false.
As the test diffs show, this catches quite a lot of patterns in existing
test coverage. This also obsoletes quite a few existing special-case
and/or of icmp folds we have (e.g. simplifyAndOrOfICmpsWithLimitConst),
but I haven't removed anything as part of this patch in the interest of
risk mitigation.
Fixes#69050.
Fixes#69091.
BlockFrequencyInfo calculates block frequencies as Scaled64 numbers but as a last step converts them to unsigned 64bit integers (`BlockFrequency`). This improves the factors picked for this conversion so that:
* Avoid big numbers close to UINT64_MAX to avoid users overflowing/saturating when adding multiply frequencies together or when multiplying with integers. This leaves the topmost 10 bits unused to allow for some room.
* Spread the difference between hottest/coldest block as much as possible to increase precision.
* If the hot/cold spread cannot be represented loose precision at the lower end, but keep the frequencies at the upper end for hot blocks differentiable.
This reverts commit e8b3ffa532b8ebac5dcdf17bb91b47817382c14d.
The AMDGPU/mad_64_32.ll seems to fail on some of the build bots but
passes locally. I'm really confused.
(sra X, BW-1) is either 0 or -1. So the multiply is a conditional
negate of Y.
This pattern shows up when type legalizing wide multiplies involving
a sign extended value.
Fixes PR57549.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133399
This reverts commit 0148df8157f05ecf3b1064508e6f012aefb87dad.
Getting a lit test failures on AMDGPU but I can't reproduce it so far.
Reverting to investigate.
(sra X, BW-1) is either 0 or -1. So the multiply is a conditional
negate of Y.
This pattern shows up when type legalizing wide multiplies involving
a sign extended value.
Fixes PR57549.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133399
The LIT test cases were migrated with the script provided by
Nikita Popov. Due to the size of the change it is split into
several parts.
Reviewed By: nemanja, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135474
The code previously used two BUILD_PAIRs to concatenate the two UMULO
results with 0s in the lower bits to match original VT. Then it created
an ADD and a UADDO with the original bit width. Each of those operations
need to be expanded since they have illegal types.
Since we put 0s in the lower bits before the ADD, the lower half of the
ADD result will be 0. So the lower half of the UADDO result is
solely determined by the other operand. Since the UADDO need to
be split in half, we don't really needd an operation for the lower
bits. Unfortunately, we don't see that in type legalization and end up
creating something more complicated and DAG combine or
lowering aren't always able to recover it.
This patch directly generates the narrower ADD and UADDO to avoid
needing to legalize them. Now only the MUL is done on the original
type.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97440
Summary: Some constants can be handled with less instructions than our current results. And it seems our original approach is not very easy to extend. Therefore this patch proposes to materialize all 64-bit constants by enumerated patterns.
I traversed almost all constants to verified the functionality of these pattens. A traversed comparison of the number of instructions used by the original method and the new method has also been completed, where no degradation was caused by this patch. This patch also passed Bootstrap test and SPEC test.
Improvements of this patch are shown in llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/constants-i64.ll
Reviewed By: steven.zhang, stefanp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92089
tryLatency compares two sched candidates. For the top zone it prefers
the one with lesser depth, but only if that depth is greater than the
total latency of the instructions we've already scheduled -- otherwise
its latency would be hidden and there would be no stall.
Unfortunately it only tests the depth of one of the candidates. This can
lead to situations where the TopDepthReduce heuristic does not kick in,
but a lower priority heuristic chooses the other candidate, whose depth
*is* greater than the already scheduled latency, which causes a stall.
The fix is to apply the heuristic if the depth of *either* candidate is
greater than the already scheduled latency.
All this also applies to the BotHeightReduce heuristic in the bottom
zone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72392
Summary:
When doing the conversion: MachineInst -> MCInst, we should ignore the
implicit operands, it will expose more opportunity for InstiAlias.
Reviewed By: steven.zhang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77118
When we try to select a SELECT_CC on Power9, we check if it can be matched to a
SETB instruction. In that function, we assert that the output type is i32/i64.
This is unnecessary as it is perfectly reasonable to have an i1 SELECT_CC.
Change that from an assert to an early exit condition.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45448
