This fixes an expensive chesk failure after 8476a5d480304. The issue
was essentially that getRegClassConstraintEffectForVReg was not doing
anything useful, sometimes. If the register passed to it is not present
in the instruction, it is a no-op and returns the original classe. The
Edit->getReg() register may not be the register as it appears in either
the use or def instruction. It may be some split register, so take
the register directly from the instruction being rematerialized.
Also directly query the constraint from the def instruction, with a
hardcoded operand index. This isn't ideal, but all the other
rematerialize
code makes the same assumption.
So far I've been unable to reproduce this with a standalone MIR test. In
the
original case, stop-before=greedy and running the one pass is not
working.
Example situation:
```
BB0:
%0 = ...
use %0
; ...
condjump BB1
jmp BB2
BB1:
%0 = ... ; rematerialized def from above (from earlier split step)
jmp BB2
BB2:
; ...
use %0
```
%0 will have a live interval with 3 value numbers (for the BB0, BB1 and
BB2 parts). Now SplitKit tries and succeeds in rematerializing the value
number in BB2 (This only works because it is a secondary split so
SplitKit is can trace this back to a single original def).
We need to recompute all live ranges affected by a value number that we
rematerialize. The case that we missed before is that when the value
that is rematerialized is at a join (Phi VNI) then we also have to
recompute liveness for the predecessor VNIs.
rdar://35699130
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42667
llvm-svn: 324039
