5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Maksim Levental
c090ed53fb
[mlir][NFC] update mlir/Dialect create APIs (33/n) (#150659)
See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147168 for more info.
2025-07-25 16:13:55 -04:00
Maksim Levental
b0312be6aa
[mlir][NFC] update mlir/Dialect create APIs (19/n) (#149926)
See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/147168 for more info.
2025-07-22 10:13:44 -04:00
Skrai Pardus
a45fda6aeb
switch type and value ordering for arith Constant[XX]Op (#144636)
This change standardizes the order of the parameters for `Constant[XXX]
Ops` to match with all other `Op` `build()` constructors.

In all instances of generated code for the MLIR dialects's Ops (that is
the TableGen using the .td files to create the .h.inc/.cpp.inc files),
the desired result type is always specified before the value.

Examples: 
```
// ArithOps.h.inc
class ConstantOp : public ::mlir::Op<ConstantOp, ::mlir::OpTrait::ZeroRegions, ::mlir::OpTrait::OneResult, ::mlir::OpTrait::OneTypedResult<::mlir::Type>::Impl, ::mlir::OpTrait::ZeroSuccessors, ::mlir::OpTrait::ZeroOperands, ::mlir::OpTrait::OpInvariants, ::mlir::BytecodeOpInterface::Trait, ::mlir::OpTrait::ConstantLike, ::mlir::ConditionallySpeculatable::Trait, ::mlir::OpTrait::AlwaysSpeculatableImplTrait, ::mlir::MemoryEffectOpInterface::Trait, ::mlir::OpAsmOpInterface::Trait, ::mlir::InferIntRangeInterface::Trait, ::mlir::InferTypeOpInterface::Trait> {
public:
....
static void build(::mlir::OpBuilder &odsBuilder, ::mlir::OperationState &odsState, ::mlir::Type result, ::mlir::TypedAttr value);
  static void build(::mlir::OpBuilder &odsBuilder, ::mlir::OperationState &odsState, ::mlir::TypedAttr value);
  static void build(::mlir::OpBuilder &odsBuilder, ::mlir::OperationState &odsState, ::mlir::TypeRange resultTypes, ::mlir::TypedAttr value);
  static void build(::mlir::OpBuilder &, ::mlir::OperationState &odsState, ::mlir::TypeRange resultTypes, ::mlir::ValueRange operands, ::llvm::ArrayRef<::mlir::NamedAttribute> attributes = {});
  static void build(::mlir::OpBuilder &odsBuilder, ::mlir::OperationState &odsState, ::mlir::ValueRange operands, ::llvm::ArrayRef<::mlir::NamedAttribute> attributes = {});
...
```
```
// ArithOps.h.inc
class SubIOp : public ::mlir::Op<SubIOp, ::mlir::OpTrait::ZeroRegions, ::mlir::OpTrait::OneResult, ::mlir::OpTrait::OneTypedResult<::mlir::Type>::Impl, ::mlir::OpTrait::ZeroSuccessors, ::mlir::OpTrait::NOperands<2>::Impl, ::mlir::OpTrait::OpInvariants, ::mlir::BytecodeOpInterface::Trait, ::mlir::ConditionallySpeculatable::Trait, ::mlir::OpTrait::AlwaysSpeculatableImplTrait, ::mlir::MemoryEffectOpInterface::Trait, ::mlir::InferIntRangeInterface::Trait, ::mlir::arith::ArithIntegerOverflowFlagsInterface::Trait, ::mlir::OpTrait::SameOperandsAndResultType, ::mlir::VectorUnrollOpInterface::Trait, ::mlir::OpTrait::Elementwise, ::mlir::OpTrait::Scalarizable, ::mlir::OpTrait::Vectorizable, ::mlir::OpTrait::Tensorizable, ::mlir::InferTypeOpInterface::Trait> {
public:
...
static void build(::mlir::OpBuilder &odsBuilder, ::mlir::OperationState &odsState, ::mlir::Type result, ::mlir::Value lhs, ::mlir::Value rhs, ::mlir::arith::IntegerOverflowFlagsAttr overflowFlags);
  static void build(::mlir::OpBuilder &odsBuilder, ::mlir::OperationState &odsState, ::mlir::Value lhs, ::mlir::Value rhs, ::mlir::arith::IntegerOverflowFlagsAttr overflowFlags);
  static void build(::mlir::OpBuilder &odsBuilder, ::mlir::OperationState &odsState, ::mlir::TypeRange resultTypes, ::mlir::Value lhs, ::mlir::Value rhs, ::mlir::arith::IntegerOverflowFlagsAttr overflowFlags);
  static void build(::mlir::OpBuilder &odsBuilder, ::mlir::OperationState &odsState, ::mlir::Type result, ::mlir::Value lhs, ::mlir::Value rhs, ::mlir::arith::IntegerOverflowFlags overflowFlags = ::mlir::arith::IntegerOverflowFlags::none);
  static void build(::mlir::OpBuilder &odsBuilder, ::mlir::OperationState &odsState, ::mlir::Value lhs, ::mlir::Value rhs, ::mlir::arith::IntegerOverflowFlags overflowFlags = ::mlir::arith::IntegerOverflowFlags::none);
  static void build(::mlir::OpBuilder &odsBuilder, ::mlir::OperationState &odsState, ::mlir::TypeRange resultTypes, ::mlir::Value lhs, ::mlir::Value rhs, ::mlir::arith::IntegerOverflowFlags overflowFlags = ::mlir::arith::IntegerOverflowFlags::none);
  static void build(::mlir::OpBuilder &, ::mlir::OperationState &odsState, ::mlir::TypeRange resultTypes, ::mlir::ValueRange operands, ::llvm::ArrayRef<::mlir::NamedAttribute> attributes = {});
  static void build(::mlir::OpBuilder &odsBuilder, ::mlir::OperationState &odsState, ::mlir::ValueRange operands, ::llvm::ArrayRef<::mlir::NamedAttribute> attributes = {});
...
```
In comparison, in the distinct case of `ConstantIntOp` and
`ConstantFloatOp`, the ordering of the result type and the value is
switched.

Thus, this PR corrects the ordering of the aforementioned
`Constant[XXX]Ops` to match with other constructors.
2025-06-23 23:35:50 +02:00
Sandeep Dasgupta
81d7eef134
Sub-channel quantized type implementation (#120172)
This is an implementation for [RFC: Supporting Sub-Channel Quantization
in
MLIR](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-supporting-sub-channel-quantization-in-mlir/82694).

In order to make the review process easier, the PR has been divided into
the following commit labels:

1. **Add implementation for sub-channel type:** Includes the class
design for `UniformQuantizedSubChannelType`, printer/parser and bytecode
read/write support. The existing types (per-tensor and per-axis) are
unaltered.
2. **Add implementation for sub-channel type:** Lowering of
`quant.qcast` and `quant.dcast` operations to Linalg operations.
3. **Adding C/Python Apis:** We first define he C-APIs and build the
Python-APIs on top of those.
4. **Add pass to normalize generic ....:** This pass normalizes
sub-channel quantized types to per-tensor per-axis types, if possible.


A  design note:
- **Explicitly storing the `quantized_dimensions`, even when they can be
derived for ranked tensor.**
While it's possible to infer quantized dimensions from the static shape
of the scales (or zero-points) tensor for ranked
data tensors
([ref](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-supporting-sub-channel-quantization-in-mlir/82694/3)
for background), there are cases where this can lead to ambiguity and
issues with round-tripping.

```
Consider the example: tensor<2x4x!quant.uniform<i8:f32:{0:2, 0:2}, {{s00:z00, s01:z01}}>>
```

The shape of the scales tensor is [1, 2], which might suggest that only
axis 1 is quantized. While this inference is technically correct, as the
block size for axis 0 is a degenerate case (equal to the dimension
size), it can cause problems with round-tripping. Therefore, even for
ranked tensors, we are explicitly storing the quantized dimensions.
Suggestions welcome!


PS: I understand that the upcoming holidays may impact your schedule, so
please take your time with the review. There's no rush.
2025-03-23 07:37:55 -05:00
Rafael Ubal
852b648624
[mlir] Improvements to the 'quant' dialect (#100667)
Full revamp of the 'quant' dialect. This is an implementation for the
RFC at
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improvements-in-the-quant-dialect/79942
2024-09-26 14:09:28 -04:00