This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our
Python code.
Reformatting is done with `black`.
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you
have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that
is to run git checkout --ours <yourfile> and then reformat it
with black.
If you run into any problems, post to discourse about it and
we will try to help.
RFC Thread below:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150761
The new method is a wrapper of `CXXConstructorDecl::isExplicit` and
`CXXConversionDecl::isExplicit`, allowing the user to recognize whether
the declaration pointed to by a cursor was marked with the explicit
specifier.
An export for the function, together with its documentation, was added
to "clang/include/clang-c/Index.h" with an implementation provided in
"clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp".
The implementation is based on similar `clang_CXXMethod`
implementations, returning a falsy unsigned value when the cursor is not
a declaration, is not a declaration for a constructor or conversion
function or is not a relevant declaration that was marked with the
`explicit` specifier.
The new symbol was added to "clang/tools/libclang/libclang.map" to be
exported, under the LLVM16 tag.
"clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c" was modified to print a
specific tag, "(explicit)", for cursors that are recognized by
`clang_CXXMethod_isExplicit`.
Two new regression files, "explicit-constructor.cpp" and
"explicit-conversion-function.cpp", were added to "clang/test/Index", to
ensure that the behavior of the new function is correct for constructors
and conversion functions, respectively.
The "get-cursor.cpp", "index-file.cpp" and
"recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp" regression files in "clang/test/Index"
were updated as they were affected by the new "(explicit)" tag.
A binding for the new function was added to libclang's python's
bindings, in "clang/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py", as the
"is_explicit_method" method under `Cursor`.
An accompanying test was added to
"clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_cursor.py", mimicking the
regression tests for the C side.
The current release note for Clang, "clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst" was
modified to report the new addition under the "libclang" section.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140756
The new method is a wrapper of `CXXConstructorDecl::isExplicit` and
`CXXConversionDecl::isExplicit`, allowing the user to recognize whether
the declaration pointed to by a cursor was marked with the explicit
specifier.
An export for the function, together with its documentation, was added
to "clang/include/clang-c/Index.h" with an implementation provided in
"clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp".
The implementation is based on similar `clang_CXXMethod`
implementations, returning a falsy unsigned value when the cursor is not
a declaration, is not a declaration for a constructor or conversion
function or is not a relevant declaration that was marked with the
`explicit` specifier.
The new symbol was added to "clang/tools/libclang/libclang.map" to be
exported, under the LLVM16 tag.
"clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c" was modified to print a
specific tag, "(explicit)", for cursors that are recognized by
`clang_CXXMethod_isExplicit`.
Two new regression files, "explicit-constructor.cpp" and
"explicit-conversion-function.cpp", were added to "clang/test/Index", to
ensure that the behavior of the new function is correct for constructors
and conversion functions, respectively.
The "get-cursor.cpp", "index-file.cpp" and
"recursive-cxx-member-calls.cpp" regression files in "clang/test/Index"
were updated as they were affected by the new "(explicit)" tag.
A binding for the new function was added to libclang's python's
bindings, in "clang/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py", as the
"is_explicit_method" method under `Cursor`.
An accompanying test was added to
"clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_cursor.py", mimicking the
regression tests for the C side.
The current release note for Clang, "clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst" was
modified to report the new addition under the "libclang" section.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140756
The new method is a wrapper of `CXXMethodDecl::isMoveAssignmentOperator` and
can be used to recognized move-assignment operators in libclang.
An export for the function, together with its documentation, was added to
"clang/include/clang-c/Index.h" with an implementation provided in
"clang/tools/libclang/CIndex.cpp". The implementation was based on
similar `clang_CXXMethod.*` implementations, following the same
structure but calling `CXXMethodDecl::isMoveAssignmentOperator` for its
main logic.
The new symbol was further added to "clang/tools/libclang/libclang.map"
to be exported, under the LLVM16 tag.
"clang/tools/c-index-test/c-index-test.c" was modified to print a
specific tag, "(move-assignment operator)", for cursors that are
recognized by `clang_CXXMethod_isMoveAssignmentOperator`.
A new regression test file,
"clang/test/Index/move-assignment-operator.cpp", was added to ensure
whether the correct constructs were recognized or not by the new function.
The "clang/test/Index/get-cursor.cpp" regression test file was updated
as it was affected by the new "(move-assignment operator)" tag.
A binding for the new function was added to libclang's python's
bindings, in "clang/bindings/python/clang/cindex.py", adding a new
method for `Cursor`, `is_move_assignment_operator_method`.
An accompanying test was added to
`clang/bindings/python/tests/cindex/test_cursor.py`, testing the new
function with the same methodology as the corresponding libclang test.
The current release note, `clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`, was modified to
report the new addition under the "libclang" section.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137246
Support a new CLANG_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable for the Python
binding tests. This variable can be used to force the bindings to load
libclang.* from a specific directory.
I plan to use this when integrating Python binding tests with the CMake
build system. Currently, those tests load libclang.so from default
search paths, so I would have to rely on platform-specific mechanics
such as LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Instead of copying the whole logic necessary
to handle platform differences into yet another place, it's easier to
just add a dedicated variable for this purpose.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52806
llvm-svn: 344240
Summary:
This fixes all but one of the test cases for Windows. TestCDB will
take more work to debug, as CompilationDatabase seems not to work correctly.
Reviewers: bkramer, wanders, jbcoe
Reviewed By: bkramer, jbcoe
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47864
Patch written by ethanhs (Ethan)
llvm-svn: 335282
This patch allows checking whether a C++ record declaration is abstract through
libclang and clang.cindex (Python).
Patch by Johann Klähn!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36952
llvm-svn: 320748
Rewrite the tests from using plain 'assert' mixed with some nosetests
methods to the standard unittest module layout. Improve the code
to use the most canonical assertion methods whenever possible.
This has a few major advantages:
- the code uses standard methods now, resulting in a reduced number
of WTFs whenever someone with basic Python knowledge gets to read it,
- completely unnecessary dependency on nosetests is removed since
the standard library supplies all that is necessary for the tests
to run,
- the tests can be run via any test runner, including the one built-in
in Python,
- the failure output for most of the tests is improved from 'assertion
x == y failed' to actually telling the values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39763
llvm-svn: 317897
Summary:
This patch allows checking the availability of cursors through libclang and clang.cindex (Python).
This e.g. allows to check whether a C++ member function has been marked as deleted.
Reviewers: arphaman, jbcoe
Reviewed By: jbcoe
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Patch by jklaehn (Johann Klähn)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36973
llvm-svn: 315959
Summary: Previously, `VisitAttributes` was not called for function and class templates and thus their attributes were not accessible using libclang.
Reviewers: bkramer, arphaman, rsmith, jbcoe
Reviewed By: jbcoe
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Patch by jklaehn (Johann Klähn)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36955
llvm-svn: 315958
Summary:
Previously the `_tu` was not propagated to the returned cursor, leading to errors when calling any
method on that cursor (e.g. `cursor.referenced`).
Reviewers: jbcoe, rsmith
Reviewed By: jbcoe
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Patch by jklaehn (Johann Klähn)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36953
llvm-svn: 313913
This commit allows checking whether an enum declaration is scoped
through libclang and clang.cindex (Python).
Patch by Johann Klähn!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35187
llvm-svn: 307771
This commit allows checking whether an enum declaration is scoped
through libclang and clang.cindex (Python).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35187
llvm-svn: 307769
Summary:
I have exposed the following function through libclang and the clang.cindex python bindings:
clang_CXXConstructor_isConvertingConstructor,
clang_CXXConstructor_isCopyConstructor,
clang_CXXConstructor_isDefaultConstructor,
clang_CXXConstructor_isMoveConstructor,
clang_CXXMethod_isDefaulted
I need (some of) these methods for a C++ code model I am building in Python to drive a code generator.
Reviewers: compnerd, skalinichev
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15469
llvm-svn: 267706
- Two new tests (one for each property), require libclang built from r155858 or later to pass
- New test utility function (get_cursors) that gets all the nodes with a specific spelling.
Patch by Evan Pipho.
llvm-svn: 156286
