```
typedef long long t67 __attribute__((aligned (4)));
struct s67 {
int a;
t67 b;
};
void f67(struct s67 x) {
}
```
When classify:
a: Lo = Integer, Hi = NoClass
b: Lo = Integer, Hi = NoClass
struct S: Lo = Integer, Hi = NoClass
```
define dso_local void @f67(i64 %x.coerce) {
```
In this case, only one i64 register is used when the structure parameter
is transferred, which is obviously incorrect.So we need to treat the
split case specially. fix
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85387.
Empty structs are ignored for parameter passing purposes, but va_arg was
incrementing the pointer anyway for that the size of empty struct in c++
is 1 byte, which could lead to va_list getting out of sync. Fix#86057.
In PR #79382, I need to add a new type that derives from
ConstantArrayType. This means that ConstantArrayType can no longer use
`llvm::TrailingObjects` to store the trailing optional Expr*.
This change refactors ConstantArrayType to store a 60-bit integer and
4-bits for the integer size in bytes. This replaces the APInt field
previously in the type but preserves enough information to recreate it
where needed.
To reduce the number of places where the APInt is re-constructed I've
also added some helper methods to the ConstantArrayType to allow some
common use cases that operate on either the stored small integer or the
APInt as appropriate.
Resolves#85124.
SizeInBytes of empty structure is 0 in C, while 1 in C++. And empty
structure argument of the function is ignored in X86_64 backend.As a
result, the value of variable arguments in C++ is incorrect. fix#77036
Co-authored-by: Longsheng Mou <moulongsheng@huawei.com>
- Update CodeGenTypeCache to use a single union for all pointers in
address space zero.
- Introduce a UnqualPtrTy in CodeGenTypeCache, and use that (for
example instead of llvm::PointerType::getUnqual) in some places.
- Drop some redundant bit/pointers casts from ptr to ptr.
MSVC allows users to pass structures with required alignments greater
than 4 to variadic functions. It does not pass them indirectly to
correctly align them. Instead, it passes them directly with the usual 4
byte stack alignment.
This change implements the same logic in clang on the passing side. The
receiving side (va_arg) never implemented any of this indirect logic, so
it doesn't need to be updated.
This issue pre-existed, but @aaron.ballman noticed it when we started
passing structs containing aligned fields indirectly in D152752.
This is an alternative of D157485 and a pre-feature to support AVX10.
AVX10 Architecture Specification: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/784267
AVX10 Technical Paper: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/784343
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-design-for-avx10-feature-support/72661
Based on the feedbacks from LLVM and GCC community, we have agreed to
start from supporting `-m[no-]evex512` on existing AVX512 features.
The option `-mno-evex512` can be used with `-mavx512xxx` to build
binaries that can run on both legacy AVX512 targets and AVX10-256.
There're still arguments about what's the expected behavior when this
option as well as `-mavx512xxx` used together with `-mavx10.1-256`. We
decided to defer the support of `-mavx10.1` after we made consensus.
Or furthermore, we start from supporting AVX10.2 and not providing any
AVX10.1 options.
Reviewed By: RKSimon, skan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159250
This is an alternative of D157485 and a pre-feature to support AVX10.
AVX10 Architecture Specification: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/784267
AVX10 Technical Paper: https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/784343
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-design-for-avx10-feature-support/72661
Based on the feedbacks from LLVM and GCC community, we have agreed to
start from supporting `-m[no-]evex512` on existing AVX512 features.
The option `-mno-evex512` can be used with `-mavx512xxx` to build
binaries that can run on both legacy AVX512 targets and AVX10-256.
There're still arguments about what's the expected behavior when this
option as well as `-mavx512xxx` used together with `-mavx10.1-256`. We
decided to defer the support of `-mavx10.1` after we made consensus.
Or furthermore, we start from supporting AVX10.2 and not providing any
AVX10.1 options.
Reviewed By: RKSimon, skan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159250
Partial progress towards replacing `CreateElementBitCast`, as it no
longer does what its name suggests. Either replace its uses with
`Address::withElementType()`, or remove them if no longer needed.
Reviewed By: barannikov88, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153314
This commit breaks up CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp into a set of *.cpp files,
one file per target. There are no functional changes, mostly just code moving.
Non-code-moving changes are:
* A virtual destructor has been added to DefaultABIInfo to pin the vtable to a cpp file.
* A few methods of ABIInfo and DefaultABIInfo were split into declaration + definition
in order to reduce the number of transitive includes.
* Several functions that used to be static have been placed in clang::CodeGen
namespace so that they can be accessed from other cpp files.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-splitting-clangs-targetinfo-cpp/69883
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148094
