HLSL constant sized array function parameters do not decay to pointers.
Instead constant sized array types are preserved as unique types for
overload resolution, template instantiation and name mangling.
This implements the change by adding a new `ArrayParameterType` which
represents a non-decaying `ConstantArrayType`. The new type behaves the
same as `ConstantArrayType` except that it does not decay to a pointer.
Values of `ConstantArrayType` in HLSL decay during overload resolution
via a new `HLSLArrayRValue` cast to `ArrayParameterType`.
`ArrayParamterType` values are passed indirectly by-value to functions
in IR generation resulting in callee generated memcpy instructions.
The behavior of HLSL function calls is documented in the [draft language
specification](https://microsoft.github.io/hlsl-specs/specs/hlsl.pdf)
under the Expr.Post.Call heading.
Additionally the design of this implementation approach is documented in
[Clang's
documentation](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/HLSL/FunctionCalls.html)
Resolves#70123
This reverts commit ca4c4a6758d184f209cb5d88ef42ecc011b11642.
This was intended not to introduce new consistency diagnostics for
smart pointer types, but failed to ignore sugar around types when
detecting this.
Fixed and test added.
This was a limitation which has now been lifted. Please read the
thread below for more details:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84405#discussion_r1525583647
Basically it allows to separate versioned implementations across
different TUs without having to share private header files which
contain the default declaration.
The ACLE spec has been updated accordingly to make this explicit:
"Each version declaration should be visible at the translation
unit in which the corresponding function version resides."
https://github.com/ARM-software/acle/pull/310
If a resolver is required (because there is a caller in the TU),
then a default declaration is implicitly generated.
This reverts commit 92a09c0165b87032e1bd05020a78ed845cf35661.
This is triggering a bunch of new -Wnullability-completeness warnings
in code with existing raw pointer nullability annotations.
The intent was the new nullability locations wouldn't affect those
warnings, so this is a bug at least for now.
This enables clang and external nullability checkers to make use of
these annotations on nullable C++ class types like unique_ptr.
These types are recognized by the presence of the _Nullable attribute.
Nullable standard library types implicitly receive this attribute.
Existing static warnings for raw pointers are extended to smart
pointers:
- nullptr used as return value or argument for non-null functions
(`-Wnonnull`)
- assigning or initializing nonnull variables with nullable values
(`-Wnullable-to-nonnull-conversion`)
It doesn't implicitly add these attributes based on the assume_nonnull
pragma, nor warn on missing attributes where the pragma would apply
them.
I'm not confident that the pragma's current behavior will work well for
C++ (where type-based metaprogramming is much more common than C/ObjC).
We'd like to revisit this once we have more implementation experience.
Support can be detected as `__has_feature(nullability_on_classes)`.
This is needed for back-compatibility, as previously clang would issue a
hard error when _Nullable appears on a smart pointer.
UBSan's `-fsanitize=nullability` will not check smart-pointer types.
It can be made to do so by synthesizing calls to `operator bool`, but
that's left for future work.
Discussion:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-allowing-nonnull-etc-on-smart-pointers/77201/26
We previously were not adding them to the candidate set and so use of a
bit-precise integer as a class member could lead to ambiguous overload
sets.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/82998
There was a bug in Clang where it couldn't choose which overload
candidate was more specialized if it was comparing a member-function to
a non-member function. Previously, this was detected as an ambiguity,
now Clang chooses correctly.
This patch fixes the bug by fully implementing CWG2445 and moving the
template transformation described in `[temp.func.order]` paragraph 3
from `isAtLeastAsSpecializedAs()` to
`Sema::getMoreSpecializedTemplate()` so we have the transformed
parameter list during the whole comparison. Also, to be able to add the
correct type for the implicit object parameter
`Sema::getMoreSpecializedTemplate()` has new parameters for the object
type.
Fixes#74494, fixes#82509
The implementation mostly reuses C++ code paths where possible,
including narrowing check in order to provide diagnostic messages in
case initializer for constexpr variable is not exactly representable in
target type.
The following won't work due to lack of support for other features:
- Diagnosing of underspecified declarations involving constexpr
- Constexpr attached to compound literals
Also due to lack of support for char8_t some of examples with utf-8
strings don't work properly.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64742
When analysing whether we should handle a binary expression as an
overloaded operator call or a builtin operator, we were calling
`checkPlaceholderForOverload()`, which takes care of any placeholders
that are not overload sets—which would usually make sense since those
need to be handled as part of overload resolution.
Unfortunately, we were also doing that for `.*`, which is not
overloadable, and then proceeding to create a builtin operator anyway,
which would crash if the RHS happened to be an unresolved overload set
(due hitting an assertion in `CreateBuiltinBinOp()`—specifically, in one
of its callees—in the `.*` case that makes sure its arguments aren’t
placeholders).
This pr instead makes it so we check for *all* placeholders early if the
operator is `.*`.
It’s worth noting that,
1. In the `.*` case, we now additionally also check for *any*
placeholders (not just non-overload-sets) in the LHS; this shouldn’t
make a difference, however—at least I couldn’t think of a way to trigger
the assertion with an overload set as the LHS of `.*`; it is worth
noting that the assertion in question would also complain if the LHS
happened to be of placeholder type, though.
2. There is another case in which we also don’t perform overload
resolution—namely `=` if the LHS is not of class or enumeration type
after handling non-overload-set placeholders—as in the `.*` case, but
similarly to 1., I first couldn’t think of a way of getting this case to
crash, and secondly, `CreateBuiltinBinOp()` doesn’t seem to care about
placeholders in the LHS or RHS in the `=` case (from what I can tell,
it, or rather one of its callees, only checks that the LHS is not a
pseudo-object type, but those will have already been handled by the call
to `checkPlaceholderForOverload()` by the time we get to this function),
so I don’t think this case suffers from the same problem.
This fixes#53815.
---------
Co-authored-by: Aaron Ballman <aaron@aaronballman.com>
There are two issues here. first `ICK_Floating_Integral` were always
defaulting to `CK_FloatingToIntegral` for vectors regardless of
direction of cast. Check was scalar only so added a vec float check to
the conditional.
Second issue was float to int casts were resolving to
ICK_Integral_Promotion when they need to be resolving to
CK_FloatingToIntegral. This was fixed by changing the ordering of
conversion checks.
This fixes#82826
HLSL supports vector truncation and element conversions as part of
standard conversion sequences. The vector truncation conversion is a C++
second conversion in the conversion sequence. If a vector truncation is
in a conversion sequence an element conversion may occur after it before
the standard C++ third conversion.
Vector element conversions can be boolean conversions, floating point or
integral conversions or promotions.
[HLSL Draft
Specification](https://microsoft.github.io/hlsl-specs/specs/hlsl.pdf)
---------
Co-authored-by: Aaron Ballman <aaron@aaronballman.com>
This patch converts `Sema::TemplateDeductionResult` into a scoped enum
in namespace scope, making it eligible for forward declaring. This is
useful in certain contexts, such as `preferred_type` annotations on
bit-fields.
Trying to compile a C-style variadic member function with an explicit
object parameter was crashing in Sema because of an out-of-bounds
access.
This fixes#80971.
This is yet another one-line patch to fix crashes on constraint
substitution.
```cpp
template <class, class> struct formatter;
template <class, class> struct basic_format_context {};
template <typename CharType>
concept has_format_function = format(basic_format_context<CharType, CharType>());
template <typename ValueType, typename CharType>
requires has_format_function<CharType>
struct formatter<ValueType, CharType> {
template <typename OutputIt>
CharType format(basic_format_context<OutputIt, CharType>);
};
```
In this case, we would build up a `RecoveryExpr` for a call within a
constraint expression due to the absence of viable functions. The
heuristic algorithm attempted to find such a function inside of a
ClassTemplatePartialSpecialization, from which we started to substitute
its requires-expression, and it succeeded with a FunctionTemplate such
that
1) It has only one parameter, which is dependent.
2) The only one parameter depends on two template parameters. They are,
in canonical form, `<template-parameter-1-0>` and
`<template-parameter-0-1>` respectively.
Before we emit an error, we still want to recover the most viable
functions. This goes downhill to deducing template parameters against
its arguments, where we would collect the argument type with the same
depth as the parameter type into a Deduced set. The size of the set is
presumed to be that of function template parameters, which is 1 in this
case. However, since we haven't yet properly set the template depth
before the dance, we'll end up putting the type for
`<template-parameter-0-1>` to the second position of Deduced set, which
is unfortunately an access violation!
The bug seems to appear since clang 12.0.
This fixes [the
case](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58548#issuecomment-1287935336).
This re-applies 30155fc0 with a fix for clangd.
### Description
clang don't evaluate the object argument of `static operator()` and
`static operator[]` currently, for example:
```cpp
#include <iostream>
struct Foo {
static int operator()(int x, int y) {
std::cout << "Foo::operator()" << std::endl;
return x + y;
}
static int operator[](int x, int y) {
std::cout << "Foo::operator[]" << std::endl;
return x + y;
}
};
Foo getFoo() {
std::cout << "getFoo()" << std::endl;
return {};
}
int main() {
std::cout << getFoo()(1, 2) << std::endl;
std::cout << getFoo()[1, 2] << std::endl;
}
```
`getFoo()` is expected to be called, but clang don't call it currently
(17.0.6). This PR fixes this issue.
Fixes#67976, reland #68485.
### Walkthrough
- **clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp**
- **`Sema::CreateOverloadedArraySubscriptExpr` &
`Sema::BuildCallToObjectOfClassType`**
Previously clang generate `CallExpr` for static operators, ignoring the
object argument. In this PR `CXXOperatorCallExpr` is generated for
static operators instead, with the object argument as the first
argument.
- **`TryObjectArgumentInitialization`**
`const` / `volatile` objects are allowed for static methods, so that we
can call static operators on them.
- **clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp**
- **`CodeGenFunction::EmitCall`**
CodeGen changes for `CXXOperatorCallExpr` with static operators: emit
and ignore the object argument first, then emit the operator call.
- **clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp**
- **`ExprEvaluatorBase::handleCallExpr`**
Evaluation of static operators in constexpr also need some small changes
to work, so that the arguments won't be out of position.
- **clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp**
- **`Sema::CheckFunctionCall`**
Code for argument checking also need to be modify, or it will fail the
test `clang/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-operator-decl.cpp`.
- **clang-tools-extra/clangd/InlayHints.cpp**
- **`InlayHintVisitor::VisitCallExpr`**
Now that the `CXXOperatorCallExpr` for static operators also have object
argument, we should also take care of this situation in clangd.
### Tests
- **Added:**
- **clang/test/AST/ast-dump-static-operators.cpp**
Verify the AST generated for static operators.
- **clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2b-static-operator.cpp**
Static operators should be able to be called on const / volatile
objects.
- **Modified:**
- **clang/test/CodeGenCXX/cxx2b-static-call-operator.cpp**
- **clang/test/CodeGenCXX/cxx2b-static-subscript-operator.cpp**
Matching the new CodeGen.
### Documentation
- **clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst**
Update release notes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Shafik Yaghmour <shafik@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: cor3ntin <corentinjabot@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Ballman <aaron@aaronballman.com>
### Description
clang don't evaluate the object argument of `static operator()` and
`static operator[]` currently, for example:
```cpp
#include <iostream>
struct Foo {
static int operator()(int x, int y) {
std::cout << "Foo::operator()" << std::endl;
return x + y;
}
static int operator[](int x, int y) {
std::cout << "Foo::operator[]" << std::endl;
return x + y;
}
};
Foo getFoo() {
std::cout << "getFoo()" << std::endl;
return {};
}
int main() {
std::cout << getFoo()(1, 2) << std::endl;
std::cout << getFoo()[1, 2] << std::endl;
}
```
`getFoo()` is expected to be called, but clang don't call it currently
(17.0.2). This PR fixes this issue.
Fixes#67976.
### Walkthrough
- **clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp**
- **`Sema::CreateOverloadedArraySubscriptExpr` &
`Sema::BuildCallToObjectOfClassType`**
Previously clang generate `CallExpr` for static operators, ignoring the
object argument. In this PR `CXXOperatorCallExpr` is generated for
static operators instead, with the object argument as the first
argument.
- **`TryObjectArgumentInitialization`**
`const` / `volatile` objects are allowed for static methods, so that we
can call static operators on them.
- **clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExpr.cpp**
- **`CodeGenFunction::EmitCall`**
CodeGen changes for `CXXOperatorCallExpr` with static operators: emit
and ignore the object argument first, then emit the operator call.
- **clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp**
- **`ExprEvaluatorBase::handleCallExpr`**
Evaluation of static operators in constexpr also need some small changes
to work, so that the arguments won't be out of position.
- **clang/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp**
- **`Sema::CheckFunctionCall`**
Code for argument checking also need to be modify, or it will fail the
test `clang/test/SemaCXX/overloaded-operator-decl.cpp`.
### Tests
- **Added:**
- **clang/test/AST/ast-dump-static-operators.cpp**
Verify the AST generated for static operators.
- **clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2b-static-operator.cpp**
Static operators should be able to be called on const / volatile
objects.
- **Modified:**
- **clang/test/CodeGenCXX/cxx2b-static-call-operator.cpp**
- **clang/test/CodeGenCXX/cxx2b-static-subscript-operator.cpp**
Matching the new CodeGen.
### Documentation
- **clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst**
Update release notes.
---------
Co-authored-by: Shafik Yaghmour <shafik@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: cor3ntin <corentinjabot@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Ballman <aaron@aaronballman.com>
Previously committed as 9e08e51a20d0d2b1c5724bb17e969d036fced4cd, and
reverted because a dependency commit was reverted, then committed again
as 4b574008aef5a7235c1f894ab065fe300d26e786 and reverted again because
"dependency commit" 5a391d38ac6c561ba908334d427f26124ed9132e was
reverted. But it doesn't seem that 5a391d38ac6c was a real dependency
for this.
This commit incorporates 4b574008aef5a7235c1f894ab065fe300d26e786 and
18e093faf726d15f210ab4917142beec51848258 by Richard Smith (@zygoloid),
with some minor fixes, most notably:
- `UncommonValue` renamed to `StructuralValue`
- `VK_PRValue` instead of `VK_RValue` as default kind in lvalue and
member pointer handling branch in
`BuildExpressionFromNonTypeTemplateArgumentValue`;
- handling of `StructuralValue` in `IsTypeDeclaredInsideVisitor`;
- filling in `SugaredConverted` along with `CanonicalConverted`
parameter in `Sema::CheckTemplateArgument`;
- minor cleanup in
`TemplateInstantiator::transformNonTypeTemplateParmRef`;
- `TemplateArgument` constructors refactored;
- `ODRHash` calculation for `UncommonValue`;
- USR generation for `UncommonValue`;
- more correct MS compatibility mangling algorithm (tested on MSVC ver.
19.35; toolset ver. 143);
- IR emitting fixed on using a subobject as a template argument when the
corresponding template parameter is used in an lvalue context;
- `noundef` attribute and opaque pointers in `template-arguments` test;
- analysis for C++17 mode is turned off for templates in
`warn-bool-conversion` test; in C++17 and C++20 mode, array reference
used as a template argument of pointer type produces template argument
of UncommonValue type, and
`BuildExpressionFromNonTypeTemplateArgumentValue` makes
`OpaqueValueExpr` for it, and `DiagnoseAlwaysNonNullPointer` cannot see
through it; despite of "These cases should not warn" comment, I'm not
sure about correct behavior; I'd expect a suggestion to replace `if` by
`if constexpr`;
- `temp.arg.nontype/p1.cpp` and `dr18xx.cpp` tests fixed.
Closes#77638, #24186
Rebased from <https://reviews.llvm.org/D156032>, see there for more
information.
Implements wording change in [CWG2137](https://wg21.link/CWG2137) in the
first commit.
This also implements an approach to [CWG2311](https://wg21.link/CWG2311)
in the second commit, because too much code that relies on `T{ T_prvalue}`
being an elision would break. Because that issue is still open and
the CWG issue doesn't provide wording to fix the issue, there may be
different behaviours on other compilers.
Fixes a regression from 69066ab3 in which we compared the template lists
of potential overloads before checkings their declaration contexts.
This would cause a crash when doing constraint substitution as part of
that template check, because we would try to refer to not yet
instantiated entities (the underlying cause is unclear).
This patch reorders (again) when we look at template parameter so we
don't do it when checkings friends in different lexical contexts.
Fixes#77953Fixes#78101
This patch replaces the `__arm_new_za`, `__arm_shared_za` and
`__arm_preserves_za` attributes in favour of:
* `__arm_new("za")`
* `__arm_in("za")`
* `__arm_out("za")`
* `__arm_inout("za")`
* `__arm_preserves("za")`
As described in https://github.com/ARM-software/acle/pull/276.
One change is that `__arm_in/out/inout/preserves(S)` are all mutually
exclusive, whereas previously it was fine to write `__arm_shared_za
__arm_preserves_za`. This case is now represented with `__arm_in("za")`.
The current implementation uses the same LLVM attributes under the hood,
since `__arm_in/out/inout` are all variations of "shared ZA", so can use
the existing `aarch64_pstate_za_shared` attribute in LLVM.
#77941 will add support for the new "zt0" state as introduced
with SME2.
Re-applies https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69595 with extra
[diff](79181efd0d)
### New changes
Further relax ambiguities with a warning for member operators of a
template class (primary templates of such ops do not match). Eg:
```cpp
template <class T>
struct S {
template <typename OtherT>
bool operator==(const OtherT &rhs);
};
struct A : S<int> {};
struct B : S<bool> {};
bool x = A{} == B{}; // accepted with a warning.
```
This is important for making llvm build using previous clang versions in
C++20 mode (eg: this makes the commit
e558be51bab051d1471d92e967f8a2aecc13567a keep working with a warning
instead of an error).
### Description from https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69595https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68999 correctly computed
conversion sequence for reversed args to a template operator. This was a
breaking change as code, previously accepted in C++17, starts to break
in C++20.
Example:
```cpp
struct P {};
template<class S> bool operator==(const P&, const S &);
struct A : public P {};
struct B : public P {};
bool check(A a, B b) { return a == b; } // This is now ambiguous in C++20.
```
In order to minimise widespread breakages, as a clang extension, we had
previously accepted such ambiguities with a warning
(`-Wambiguous-reversed-operator`) for non-template operators. Due to the
same reasons, we extend this relaxation for template operators.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53954
Prior to this, attempts to bind a bit-field to an NTTP of reference type
produced an error because references to subobjects in NTTPs are
disallowed. But C++20 allows references to subobjects in NTTPs generally
(see
[P1907R1](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1907r1.html)).
Without this change, implementing P1907R1 would cause a bug allowing
bit-fields to be bound to reference template arguments.
Extracted from https://reviews.llvm.org/D140996
Functions which correspond but have different template parameter lists
are not redeclarations.
Fixes a regression introduced by af4751
(The patch just moves the template parameters check above if the
signature check)
Fixes#76358
This reverts commit a1e2c6566305061c115954b048f2957c8d55cb5b.
Revert this patch due to regression. A testcase is:
`template <typename T>
class C {
explicit C() {};
};
template <> C<int>::C() {};
`
When deciding whether a previous function declaration is an overload or
override, implicit host/device attrs should not be considered.
This fixes the failure for the following code:
`template <typename T>
class C {
explicit C() {};
};
template <> C<int>::C() {};
`
The issue was introduced by
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72394
sine the template specialization is treated as overload due to implicit
host/device attrs are considered for overload/override differentiation.
This is a follow-up to febf5c97bba7910e796041c9518fce01f31ae826 and
another instance of #64121.
The added test only fails if Clang is built with libc++ and a enabled
debug check for strict weak ordering.
This patch introduces a new enumerator `Invalid = 0`, shifting other enumerators by +1. Contrary to how it might sound, this actually affirms status quo of how this enum is stored in `clang::Decl`:
```
/// If 0, we have not computed the linkage of this declaration.
/// Otherwise, it is the linkage + 1.
mutable unsigned CacheValidAndLinkage : 3;
```
This patch makes debuggers to not be mistaken about enumerator stored in this bit-field. It also converts `clang::Linkage` to a scoped enum.
This patch moves `ArraySizeModifier` before `Type` declaration so that it's complete at `ArrayTypeBitfields` declaration. It's also converted to scoped enum along the way.
This breaks C++20 build of LLVM by clang 17 and earlier.
Next steps should be reduce error to a warning for
https://godbolt.org/z/s99bvq4sG
b100ca6f219fda1fed5b92aba8471aa9a6ef8906 or similar should be reapplied
after the bug fix reached clang-18.
`S.getScopeForContext` determins the **active** scope associated with
the given `declContext`.
This fails to find the matching `operator!=` if candidate `operator==`
was found via ADL since that scope is not active.
Instead, just directly lookup using the namespace decl of `operator==`
Fixes#68901
Make it a strict weak order.
Fixes#64121.
Current implementation uses the definition of ordering from the C++ Standard.
The definition provides only a partial order and cannot be used in sorting
algorithms.
The debug builds of libc++ are capable of detecting that problem
and this failure was found when building Clang with libc++ and
those extra checks enabled, see #64121.
The new ordering is a strict weak order and still
pushes most interesting functions to the start of the list.
In some cases, it leads to better results, e.g.
```
struct Foo {
operator int();
operator const char*();
};
void test() { Foo() - Foo(); }
```
Now produces a list with two most relevant builtin operators at the top,
i.e. `operator-(int, int)` and `operator-(const char*, const char*)`.
Previously `operator-(const char*, const char*)` was the first element,
but `operator-(int, int)` was only the 13th element in the output.
This is a consequence of `stable_sort` now being able to compare those
two candidates, which are indistinguishable in the semantic partial order
despite being two local minimums in their respective comparable
subsets.
However, new implementation does not take into account some aspects of
C++ semantics, e.g. which function template is more specialized. This
can also lead to worse ordering sometimes.
Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159351
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68999 correctly computed
conversion sequence for reversed args to a template operators. This was
a breaking change as code, previously accepted in C++17, starts to break
in C++20.
Example:
```cpp
struct P {};
template<class S> bool operator==(const P&, const S &);
struct A : public P {};
struct B : public P {};
bool check(A a, B b) { return a == b; } // This is now ambiguous in C++20.
```
In order to minimise widespread breakages, as a clang extension, we had
previously accepted such ambiguities with a warning
(`-Wambiguous-reversed-operator`) for non-template operators. Due to the
same reasons, we extend this relaxation for template operators.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53954
We associated conversion seq for args (when reversed) to the wrong
index.
This lead to clang believing reversed `operator==` a worse overload
candidate than the `operator==` without reversed args when both these
candidate were ambiguous.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53954
If there are two guides, one of them generated from a non-templated
constructor
and the other from a templated constructor, then the standard gives
priority to
the first. Clang detected ambiguity before, now the correct guide is
chosen.
The correct behavior is described in this paper:
http://wg21.link/P0620R0
Example for the bug: http://godbolt.org/z/ee3e9qG78
As an unrelated minor change, fix the issue
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64020,
which could've led to incorrect behavior if further development inserted
code after a call to
`isAddressSpaceSubsetOf()`, which specified the two parameters in the
wrong order.
---------
Co-authored-by: hobois <horvath.botond.istvan@gmial.com>
