5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
NagyDonat
afa8a2eed0
[analyzer] Remove superfluous #include "CallDescription.h" (NFC) (#82614)
To fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/81597, I'm planning
to refactor the usage of CallDescription; and as I was preparing for
this I noticed that there are two superfluous references to this header.
2024-02-22 14:29:05 +01:00
Kazu Hirata
6ad0788c33 [clang] Use std::optional instead of llvm::Optional (NFC)
This patch replaces (llvm::|)Optional< with std::optional<.  I'll post
a separate patch to remove #include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h".

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-14 12:31:01 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
a1580d7b59 [clang] Add #include <optional> (NFC)
This patch adds #include <optional> to those files containing
llvm::Optional<...> or Optional<...>.

I'll post a separate patch to actually replace llvm::Optional with
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2023-01-14 11:07:21 -08:00
Balázs Kéri
3c7fe7d09d [clang][analyzer] Add stream related functions to StdLibraryFunctionsChecker.
Additional stream handling functions are added.
These are partially evaluated by StreamChecker, result of the addition is
check for more preconditions and construction of success and failure branches
with specific errno handling.

Reviewed By: Szelethus

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140387
2023-01-06 11:04:24 +01:00
Balázs Kéri
60f3b07118 [clang][analyzer] Add checker for bad use of 'errno'.
Extend checker 'ErrnoModeling' with a state of 'errno' to indicate
the importance of the 'errno' value and how it should be used.
Add a new checker 'ErrnoChecker' that observes use of 'errno' and
finds possible wrong uses, based on the "errno state".
The "errno state" should be set (together with value of 'errno')
by other checkers (that perform modeling of the given function)
in the future. Currently only a test function can set this value.
The new checker has no user-observable effect yet.

Reviewed By: martong, steakhal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122150
2022-06-20 10:07:31 +02:00