18 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Brad King
028d13b156 [clang] Add ElaboratedType sugaring for types on implicit special members
Extend the change from commit 15f3cd6bfc67 ([clang] Implement
ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare, 2021-10-11, D112374)
to cover types in the signatures of implicit copy-constructor,
copy-assignment, move-constructor, and move-assignment members in
C++ record types.

With this fix, diagnostic messages print types of special members
consistently whether they are explicitly or implicitly defined.

Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59557

Reviewed By: rsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141441
2023-01-20 15:51:32 -08:00
Matheus Izvekov
15f3cd6bfc
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could expose a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-27 11:10:54 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere
888673b6e3
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was  re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.
2022-07-14 21:17:48 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov
7c51f02eff
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-15 04:16:55 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere
3968936b92
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.

  import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py

https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/
2022-07-13 09:20:30 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov
bdc6974f92
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-13 02:10:09 +02:00
Bruno Ricci
1f30dba14d [Sema][NFC] Add more tests for the behavior of argument-dependent name lookup
The goal here is to exercise each rule in [basic.lookup.argdep] at least once.
These new tests expose what I believe are 2 issues:

1. CWG 1691 needs to be implemented (p2:  [...] Its associated namespaces are
   the innermost enclosing namespaces of its associated classes [...]) The
   corresponding tests are adl_class_type::X2 and adl_class_type::X5.

2. The end of paragraph 2 ([...] Additionally, if the aforementioned set of
   overloaded functions is named with a template-id, its associated classes
   and namespaces also include those of its type template-arguments and its
   template template-arguments.) is not implemented. Closely related, the
   restriction on non-dependent parameter types in this same paragraph needs
   to be removed. The corresponding tests are in adl_overload_set (both issues
   are from CWG 997).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60570

Reviewed By: riccibruno, Quuxplusone

llvm-svn: 358881
2019-04-22 11:40:31 +00:00
Charles Li
e7cbb3ed4f [Lit Test] Updated 34 Lit tests to be C++11 compatible.
Added expected diagnostics new to C++11.
Expanded RUN line to: default, C++98/03 and C++11.

llvm-svn: 253371
2015-11-17 20:25:05 +00:00
Richard Trieu
553b2b2e5d Modify how the -verify flag works. Currently, the verification string and
diagnostic message are compared.  If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given.  This gives rise to an unexpected case:

  // expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}

will match the following error messages from Clang:

  candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
  candidate function has different number of parameters

It will also match these other error messages:

  candidate function
  function has different number of parameters
  number of parameters

This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting.  Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected.  Some stats from this cleanup:

87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)

llvm-svn: 146619
2011-12-15 00:38:15 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
8ea21dc2af Update this test to reflect the new (deterministic) order in r134038.
This was part of Kaelyn's original patch that got dropped while I was
working on it, but after I ran my tests. =/ Sorry.

llvm-svn: 134039
2011-06-28 22:58:10 +00:00
Chad Rosier
c8a215f251 Modify test case to allow buildbots to make forward progress. This test should
now (incorrectly) pass.  Once the appropriate fixes have been made this test
should be reverted.

llvm-svn: 134035
2011-06-28 22:29:53 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
c2fa169d6c Add support for C++ namespace-aware typo correction, e.g., correcting
vector<int>

to

  std::vector<int>

Patch by Kaelyn Uhrain, with minor tweaks + PCH support from me. Fixes
PR5776/<rdar://problem/8652971>.

Thanks Kaelyn!

llvm-svn: 134007
2011-06-28 16:20:02 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
9574af6ea2 Teach Sema::ActOnUninitializedDecl() not to try to interpret when one
should use a constructor to default-initialize a
variable. InitializationSequence knows the rules for default
initialization, better. Fixes <rdar://problem/8501008>.

llvm-svn: 131796
2011-05-21 17:52:48 +00:00
Chris Lattner
7f2c7f4ef3 "const std::vector<int>*" not "std::vector<int> const*"
llvm-svn: 113094
2010-09-05 00:27:00 +00:00
John McCall
30837102a2 Put function templates instantiated from friend declarations in the correct
lexical context.  This is required for ADL to work properly;  fixes PR6716.

llvm-svn: 99665
2010-03-26 23:10:15 +00:00
John McCall
d681c3959f Introduce a centralized routine in Sema for diagnosing failed lookups (when
used as expressions).  In dependent contexts, try to recover by doing a lookup
in previously-dependent base classes.  We get better diagnostics out, but    
unfortunately the recovery fails:  we need to turn it into a method call  
expression, not a bare call expression.  Thus this is still a WIP.

llvm-svn: 91525
2009-12-16 08:11:27 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar
8fbe78f6fc Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
   which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
   can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
   a default target).

llvm-svn: 91446
2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00
John McCall
d1e9d835f3 Argument-dependent lookup for friend declarations. Add a new decl type,
FriendFunctionDecl, and create instances as appropriate.

The design of FriendFunctionDecl is still somewhat up in the air;  you can
befriend arbitrary types of functions --- methods, constructors, etc. ---
and it's not clear that this representation captures that very well.
We'll have a better picture when we start consuming this data in access
control.

llvm-svn: 78653
2009-08-11 06:59:38 +00:00