Revert "[Clang][C++23] Implement P2448R2: Relaxing some constexpr
restrictions (#77753)"
This reverts commit 99500e8c08a4d941acb8a7eb00523296fb2acf7a because it
causes a behavior change for std=c++20. See
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77753.
Per
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2448r2.html
function/constructor/destructor can be marked `constexpr` even though it
never produces a constant expression.
Non-literal types as return types and parameter types of functions
marked `constexpr` are also allowed.
Since this is not a DR, the diagnostic messages are still preserved for
C++ standards older than C++23.
https://godbolt.org/z/cMKE3o1aG
According to the issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63960 , compiler falsely complains that no viable `operator<=>` was found while we are actually looking for a `operator==`.
This bug has been fixed through adding a check of the `OverloadedOperatorKind` type's object, `OO`, to see if it is `OO_EqualEqual` in addition to `OO_ExclaimEqual`.
Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, cor3ntin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155714
Prior to P2448R2 we were more aggressive in diagnosing ill-formed
constexpr functions. Many of these restrictions were relaxed and now it
is not required for defaulted comparison operators to call constexpr
functions.
This behavior is extended to before C++23 and diagnostic for it's use
can be enabled w/ -pedantic or -Wc++2b-default-comp-relaxed-constexpr
This fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61238
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146090
This patch just makes the error message clearer by reinforcing the cause
was a lack of viable **three-way** comparison function for the
**complete object**.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97990
This requires us to essentially fully form the body of the defaulted
comparison, but from an unevaluated context. Naively this would require
generating the function definition twice; instead, we ensure that the
function body is implicitly defined before performing the check, and
walk the actual body where possible.
