Revert "[Clang][C++23] Implement P2448R2: Relaxing some constexpr
restrictions (#77753)"
This reverts commit 99500e8c08a4d941acb8a7eb00523296fb2acf7a because it
causes a behavior change for std=c++20. See
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77753.
Per
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2448r2.html
function/constructor/destructor can be marked `constexpr` even though it
never produces a constant expression.
Non-literal types as return types and parameter types of functions
marked `constexpr` are also allowed.
Since this is not a DR, the diagnostic messages are still preserved for
C++ standards older than C++23.
Adds diagnostics for lambda expressions being cast to boolean values,
which results in the expression always evaluating to true.
Earlier, Clang allowed compilation of such erroneous programs, but now
emits a warning through `-Wpointer-bool-conversion`.
Fixes#82512
According to [expr.prim.id.qual] p3:
> The _nested-name-specifier_ `::` nominates the global namespace. A
_nested-name-specifier_ with a _computed-type-specifier_ nominates the
type denoted by the _computed-type-specifier_, which shall be a class or
enumeration type. **If a _nested-name-specifier_ `N` is declarative and
has a _simple-template-id_ with a template argument list `A` that
involves a template parameter, let `T` be the template nominated by `N`
without `A`. `T` shall be a class template.**
Meaning, the out-of-line definition of `A::f` in the following example
is ill-formed:
```
template<typename T>
struct A
{
void f();
};
template<typename T>
using B = A<T>;
template<typename T>
void B<T>::f() { } // error: a declarative nested name specifier cannot name an alias template
```
This patch diagnoses such cases as an extension (in group `alias-template-in-declaration-name`).
Reapplication of 7339c0f782d5c70e0928f8991b0c05338a90c84c with a fix
for a crash involving arrays without a size expression.
Clang supports VLAs in C++ as an extension, but we currently only warn
on their use when you pass -Wvla, -Wvla-extension, or -pedantic.
However, VLAs as they're expressed in C have been considered by WG21
and rejected, are easy to use accidentally to the surprise of users
(e.g., https://ddanilov.me/default-non-standard-features/), and they
have potential security implications beyond constant-size arrays
(https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/ARR32-C.+Ensure+size+arguments+for+variable+length+arrays+are+in+a+valid+range).
C++ users should strongly consider using other functionality such as
std::vector instead.
This seems like sufficiently compelling evidence to warn users about
VLA use by default in C++ modes. This patch enables the -Wvla-extension
diagnostic group in C++ language modes by default, and adds the warning
group to -Wall in GNU++ language modes. The warning is still opt-in in
C language modes, where support for VLAs is somewhat less surprising to
users.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-diagnosing-use-of-vlas-in-c/73109
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62836
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156565
This reverts commit 491b2810fb7fe5f080fa9c4f5945ed0a6909dc92.
This change broke valid code and generated incorrect diagnostics, see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D155064
This patch makes clang diagnose extensive cases of consteval if and is_constant_evaluated usage that are tautologically true or false.
This introduces a new IsRuntimeEvaluated boolean flag to Sema::ExpressionEvaluationContextRecord that means the immediate appearance of if consteval or is_constant_evaluated are tautologically false(e.g. inside if !consteval {} block or non-constexpr-qualified function definition body)
This patch also pushes new expression evaluation context when parsing the condition of if constexpr and initializer of constexpr variables so that Sema can be aware that the use of consteval if and is_consteval are tautologically true in if constexpr condition and constexpr variable initializers.
BEFORE this patch, the warning for is_constant_evaluated was emitted from constant evaluator. This patch moves the warning logic to Sema in order to diagnose tautological use of is_constant_evaluated in the same way as consteval if.
This patch separates initializer evaluation context from InitializerScopeRAII.
This fixes a bug that was happening when user takes address of function address in initializers of non-local variables.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/43760
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51567
Reviewed By: cor3ntin, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155064
Since C++14 has been released for about nine years and most standard
libraries have implemented sized deallocation functions, it's time to
make this feature default again.
Reviewed By: rnk, aaron.ballman, #libc, ldionne, Mordante, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921
We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.
This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
This commit implements [temp.deduct]p9.
Test updates include:
- New notes in `cxx1y-init-captures.cpp`, `lambda-expressions.cpp`
and 'warn-unused-lambda-capture.cpp'.
This seems to be caused by diagnosing errors earlier (during
deduction) that were previously surfaced later (during
instantiation).
- New error `lambda-unevaluated.cpp` is in line with [temp.deduct]p9.
Reviewed By: erichkeane, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148802
During the ISO C++ Committee meeting plenary session the C++23 Standard
has been voted as technical complete.
This updates the reference to c++2b to c++23 and updates the __cplusplus
macro.
Drive-by fixes c++1z -> c++17 and c++2a -> c++20 when seen.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149553
expr.prim.lambda.capture p5 says:
If an identifier in a capture appears as the declarator-id of a parameter of
the lambda-declarator's parameter-declaration-clause or as the name of a
template parameter of the lambda-expression's template-parameter-list,
the program is ill-formed.
and also has the following example:
```
auto h = [y = 0]<typename y>(y) { return 0; };
```
which now results in
```
error: declaration of 'y' shadows template parameter
auto l1 = [y = 0]<typename y>(y) { return 0; };
^
note: template parameter is declared here
auto l1 = [y = 0]<typename y>(y) { return 0; };
^
```
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61105
Reviewed By: shafik, cor3ntin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148712
This results in expressions that appear in default function argument not
being checked for being actual constant expressions.
This aligns clang's behavior with the standard and fixes one of the
examples from https://wg21.link/P1073R3.
Reviewed By: shafik, cor3ntin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145251
https://wg21.link/p1937 proposes that in unevaluated contexts, consteval
functions should not be immediately evaluated.
Clang implemented p1937 a while ago, its behavior is correct and the
test needs an update.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145362
This implements P2036R3 and P2579R0.
That is, explicit, int, and implicit capture become visible
at the start of the parameter head.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rupprecht, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124351
During Clang 15, 3d2629dd3aab17098813c68b5b76bb864bc5e285 claimed we
achieved full support for consteval in C++20. However, further testing
shows that Clang doesn't correctly handle all of the examples from
https://wg21.link/P1073R3 and has several other known issues that are
preventing us from defining the `__cpp_consteval` macro.
I think we should only claim Partial support for the moment. Once we
correct the major outstanding issues, then I think we should change the
status back to full support and define __cpp_consteval at the same time
(even if it's only to the 201811L value instead of the latest value
from C++2b). This helps users understand the support situation more
clearly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144572
This reverts commit d708a186b6a9b050d09558163dd353d9f738c82d (and typo fix e4bc9898ddbeb70bc49d713bbf863f050f21e03f). It causes a compilation error for this:
```
struct StringLiteral {
template <int N>
StringLiteral(const char (&array)[N])
__attribute__((enable_if(N > 0 && N == __builtin_strlen(array) + 1,
"invalid string literal")));
};
struct Message {
Message(StringLiteral);
};
void Func1() {
auto x = Message("x"); // Note: this is fine
// Note: "xx\0" to force a different type, StringLiteral<3>, otherwise this
// successfully builds.
auto y = [&](decltype(Message("xx"))) {};
// ^ fails with: repro.cc:18:13: error: reference to local variable 'array'
// declared in enclosing function 'StringLiteral::StringLiteral<3>'
(void)x;
(void)y;
}
```
More details posted to D124351.
This implements P2036R3 and P2579R0.
That is, explicit, int, and implicit capture become visible
at the start of the parameter head.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124351
This reverts commit b8064374b217db061213c561ec8f3376681ff9c8.
Based on the report here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59271
this produces a significant increase in memory use of the compiler and a
large compile-time regression. This patch reverts this so that we don't
branch for release with that issue.
Currently we don't diagnose overflow in a constant expression for the case of
compound assignment with remainder as a operand.
In handleIntIntBinOp the arguments LHS and Result can be the same source but in
the check for remainder in this function we assigned to Result before checking
for overflow. In all the other operations the check is done before Result is
assigned to.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140455
> Dependent access checks.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53364
We previously ignored dependent access checks to private members.
These are visible only to the `RequiresExprBodyExpr` (through `PerformDependentDiagnositcs`) and not to the individual requirements.
---
> Non-dependent access checks.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53334
Access to members in a non-dependent context would always yield an
invalid expression. When it appears in a requires-expression, then this
is a hard error as this would always result in a substitution failure.
https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.prim.req#general-note-1
> Note 1: If a requires-expression contains invalid types or expressions in its requirements, and it does not appear within the declaration of a templated entity, then the program is ill-formed. — end note]
> If the substitution of template arguments into a requirement would always result in a substitution failure, the program is ill-formed; no diagnostic required.
The main issue here is the delaying of the diagnostics.
Use a `ParsingDeclRAIIObject` creates a separate diagnostic pool for diagnositcs associated to the `RequiresExprBodyDecl`.
This is important because dependent diagnostics should not be leaked/delayed to higher scopes (Eg. inside a template function or in a trailing requires). These dependent diagnostics must be attached to the `DeclContext` of the parameters of `RequiresExpr` (which is the `RequiresExprBodyDecl` in this case).
Non dependent diagnostics, on the other hand, should not delayed and surfaced as hard errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140547
to member naming a weak member to nullptr.
This fixes a miscompile where constant evaluation would incorrectly
determine that a weak member function pointer is never null.
In passing, also improve the diagnostics for constant evaluation of some
nearby cases.
This makes use of the changes introduced in D134604, in order to
instantiate non-type template parameters and default template arguments
with a final sugared substitution.
This comes at no additional relevant cost.
Since we don't track / unique them in specializations, we wouldn't be
able to resugar them later anyway.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136564
This patch reverts
- commit d4b1964f0554046b1e64908e5c1cd701b25f4c9e
- commit 59f0827e2cf3755834620e7e0b6d946832440f80([clang] Instantiate alias templates with sugar)
As it makes clang fail to pass some code it used to compile.
See comments: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136564#3891065
Since we don't unique specializations for concepts, we can just instantiate
them with the sugared template arguments, at negligible cost.
If we don't track their specializations, we can't resugar them later
anyway, and that would be more expensive than just instantiating them
sugared in the first place since it would require an additional pass.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136566
This makes use of the changes introduced in D134604, in order to
instantiate non-type template parameters and default template arguments
with a final sugared substitution.
This comes at no additional relevant cost.
Since we don't track / unique them in specializations, we wouldn't be
able to resugar them later anyway.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136564
Since we don't unique specializations for concepts, we can just instantiate
them with the sugared template arguments, at negligible cost.
If we don't track their specializations, we can't resugar them later
anyway, and that would be more expensive than just instantiating them
sugared in the first place since it would require an additional pass.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136566
This makes use of the changes introduced in D134604, in order to
instantiate non-type template parameters and default template arguments
with a final sugared substitution.
This comes at no additional relevant cost.
Since we don't track / unique them in specializations, we wouldn't be
able to resugar them later anyway.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136564
requires-expression
As reported: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57487
We properly treated a failed instantiation of a concept as a
unsatisified constraint, however, we need to do this at the 'requires
clause' level as well. This ensures that the parameters on a requires
clause that fail instantiation will cause a satisfaction failure.
This patch implements this by running requires parameter clause
instantiation under a SFINAE trap, then stores any such failure as a
requirement failure, so it can be diagnosed later.
