According to [expr.prim.id.qual] p3:
> The _nested-name-specifier_ `::` nominates the global namespace. A
_nested-name-specifier_ with a _computed-type-specifier_ nominates the
type denoted by the _computed-type-specifier_, which shall be a class or
enumeration type. **If a _nested-name-specifier_ `N` is declarative and
has a _simple-template-id_ with a template argument list `A` that
involves a template parameter, let `T` be the template nominated by `N`
without `A`. `T` shall be a class template.**
Meaning, the out-of-line definition of `A::f` in the following example
is ill-formed:
```
template<typename T>
struct A
{
void f();
};
template<typename T>
using B = A<T>;
template<typename T>
void B<T>::f() { } // error: a declarative nested name specifier cannot name an alias template
```
This patch diagnoses such cases as an extension (in group `alias-template-in-declaration-name`).
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3eb115b1c3592514590a19987ffc498.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
This reverts commit b7e77ff25fb2412f6ab6d6cc756666b0e2f97bd3.
Reason: Broke sanitizer builds bots + libcxx. 'static assertion
expression is not an integral constant expression'. More details
available in the Phabricator review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Display 'static_assert failed: message' instead of
'static_assert failed "message"' to be consistent
with other implementations and be slightly more
readable.
Reviewed By: #libc, aaron.ballman, philnik, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128844
Instead of dumping the string literal (which
quotes it and escape every non-ascii symbol),
we can use the content of the string when it is a
8 byte string.
Wide, UTF-8/UTF-16/32 strings are still completely
escaped, until we clarify how these entities should
behave (cf https://wg21.link/p2361).
`FormatDiagnostic` is modified to escape
non printable characters and invalid UTF-8.
This ensures that unicode characters, spaces and new
lines are properly rendered in static messages.
This make clang more consistent with other implementation
and fixes this tweet
https://twitter.com/jfbastien/status/1298307325443231744 :)
Of note, `PaddingChecker` did print out new lines that were
later removed by the diagnostic printing code.
To be consistent with its tests, the new lines are removed
from the diagnostic.
Unicode tables updated to both use the Unicode definitions
and the Unicode 14.0 data.
U+00AD SOFT HYPHEN is still considered a print character
to match existing practices in terminals, in addition of
being considered a formatting character as per Unicode.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108469
The standard says:
The optional requires-clause ([temp.pre]) in an init-declarator or
member-declarator shall be present only if the declarator declares a
templated function ([dcl.fct]).
This implements that limitation, and updates the tests to the best of my
ability to capture the intent of the original checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125711
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd84938470bf2e337801faafb8a67710f46429d with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5a672d707390e2c3eaf30a9eb4b075c
Reverted in f9ad1d1c775a8e264bebc15d75e0c6e5c20eefc7 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
Looks like lldb has some issues with this - somehow it causes lldb to
treat a "char[N]" type as an array of chars (prints them out
individually) but a "char [N]" is printed as a string. (even though the
DWARF doesn't have this string in it - it's something to do with the
string lldb generates for itself using clang)
This reverts commit 277623f4d5a672d707390e2c3eaf30a9eb4b075c.
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd84938470bf2e337801faafb8a67710f46429d with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
A constrained function with an auto return type would have it's definition
instantiated in order to deduce the auto return type before the constraints
are checked.
Move the constraints check after the return type deduction.
We previously checked for containsUnexpandedParameterPack in CSEs by observing the property
in the converted arguments of the CSE. This may not work if the argument is an expanded
type-alias that contains a pack-expansion (see added test).
Check the as-written arguments when determining containsUnexpandedParameterPack and isInstantiationDependent.
Now with concepts support merged and mostly complete, we do not need -fconcepts-ts
(which was also misleading as we were not implementing the TS) and can enable
concepts features under C++2a. A warning will be generated if users still attempt
to use -fconcepts-ts.
Function trailing requires clauses now parsed, supported in overload resolution and when calling, referencing and taking the address of functions or function templates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43357
Added support for constraint satisfaction checking and partial ordering of constraints in constrained partial specialization and function template overloads.
Re-commit after fixing another crash (added regression test).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41910
Added support for constraint satisfaction checking and partial ordering of constraints in constrained partial specialization and function template overloads.
Re-commit after fixing some crashes and warnings.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41910
Added support for constraint satisfaction checking and partial ordering of constraints in constrained partial specialization and function template overloads.
Phabricator: D41910
Part of the C++20 concepts implementation effort.
- Associated constraints (requires clauses, currently) are now enforced when instantiating/specializing templates and when considering partial specializations and function overloads.
- Elaborated diagnostics give helpful insight as to why the constraints were not satisfied.
Phabricator: D41569
Re-commit, after fixing some memory bugs.
Part of the C++20 concepts implementation effort.
- Associated constraints (requires clauses, currently) are now enforced when instantiating/specializing templates and when considering partial specializations and function overloads.
- Elaborated diagnostics give helpful insight as to why the constraints were not satisfied.
Phabricator: D41569
Part of C++20 Concepts implementation effort. Added Concept Specialization Expressions that are created when a concept is refe$
D41217 on Phabricator.
(recommit after fixing failing Parser test on windows)
llvm-svn: 374903
Part of C++20 Concepts implementation effort. Added Concept Specialization Expressions that are created when a concept is referenced with arguments, and tests thereof.
llvm-svn: 374882
