3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Krystian Stasiowski
a0d266d705
[Clang][Sema] Allow elaborated-type-specifiers that declare member class template explict specializations (#78720)
According to [[dcl.type.elab]
p2](http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.type.elab#2):
> If an
[elaborated-type-specifier](http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.type.elab#nt:elaborated-type-specifier)
is the sole constituent of a declaration, the declaration is ill-formed
unless it is an explicit specialization, an explicit instantiation or it
has one of the following forms [...]

Consider the following:
```cpp
template<typename T>
struct A 
{
    template<typename U>
    struct B;
};

template<>
template<typename U>
struct A<int>::B; // #1
```
The _elaborated-type-specifier_ at `#1` declares an explicit
specialization (which is itself a template). We currently (incorrectly)
reject this, and this PR fixes that.

I moved the point at which _elaborated-type-specifiers_ with
_nested-name-specifiers_ are diagnosed from `ParsedFreeStandingDeclSpec`
to `ActOnTag` for two reasons: `ActOnTag` isn't called for explicit
instantiations and partial/explicit specializations, and because it's
where we determine if a member specialization is being declared.

With respect to diagnostics, I am currently issuing the diagnostic
without marking the declaration as invalid or returning early, which
results in more diagnostics that I think is necessary. I would like
feedback regarding what the "correct" behavior should be here.
2024-01-30 08:28:13 -05:00
Alan Zhao
6f2b347895 Add missing struct keyword to the test p2-2.cpp
While working on D53847, I noticed that this test would fail once we
started recognizing the types in the modified `export` statement [0].
The tests would fail because Clang would emit a "declaration does not
declare anything" diagnostic instead of the expected namespace scope
diagnostic.

I believe that the test is currently incorrectly passing because Clang
doesn't parse the type and therefore doesn't treat the statement as a
declaration. My understanding is that the intention of this test case is
that it wants to export a `struct` type, which I believe requires a
`struct` keyword, even for types with template parameters. With this
change, the only error with these two statements should be the
namespace scope issue.

[0]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53847?id=462032#inline-1297053

Reviewed By: erichkeane

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134578
2022-09-28 09:48:00 -07:00
Chuanqi Xu
3a3af2bbc9 [C++20] [Module] fix bug 47716 and implement [module.interface]/p6
This fixes bug 47716.

According to [module.interface]p2, it is meaningless to export an entity
which is not in namespace scope.
The reason why the compiler crashes is that the compiler missed
ExportDecl when the compiler traverse the subclass of DeclContext. So
here is the crash.

Also, the patch implements [module.interface]p6 in
Sema::CheckRedeclaration* functions.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, urnathan

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112903
2022-01-24 10:25:25 +08:00