We need to be able to distinguish individual TUs from the same module in cases
where TU-local entities either need to be hidden (or, for some cases of ADL in
template instantiation, need to be detected as exposures).
This creates a module type for the implementation which implicitly imports its
primary module interface per C++20:
[module.unit/8] 'A module-declaration that contains neither an export-keyword
nor a module-partition implicitly imports the primary module interface unit of
the module as if by a module-import-declaration.
Implementation modules are never serialized (-emit-module-interface for an
implementation unit is diagnosed and rejected).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126959
This reverts commit c6e9823724ef6bdfee262289ee34d162db436af0.
Reason: Broke the ASan buildbots, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D126959
(the original phabricator review) for more info.
We need to be able to distinguish individual TUs from the same module in cases
where TU-local entities either need to be hidden (or, for some cases of ADL in
template instantiation, need to be detected as exposures).
This creates a module type for the implementation which implicitly imports its
primary module interface per C++20:
[module.unit/8] 'A module-declaration that contains neither an export-keyword
nor a module-partition implicitly imports the primary module interface unit of
the module as if by a module-import-declaration.
Implementation modules are never serialized (-emit-module-interface for an
implementation unit is diagnosed and rejected).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126959
module unit directly
Previously we lack a test which ensures that the module unit will
generate initializer if it is compiled directly (instead of from a pcm
file). Now we add the test back.
Previsouly the module-initializer*.cpp lives in the CodeGen dir instead
of CodeGenCXX dir, which is not consistency with other tests since
modules are features for C++.
