4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chuanqi Xu
da00c60dae
[C++20] [Modules] Introduce reduced BMI (#75894)
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/71034

See

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-c-20-modules-introduce-thin-bmi-and-decls-hash/74755

This patch introduces reduced BMI, which doesn't contain the definitions
of functions and variables if its definitions won't contribute to the
ABI.

Testing is a big part of the patch. We want to make sure the reduced BMI
contains the same behavior with the existing and relatively stable
fatBMI. This is pretty helpful for further reduction.

The user interfaces part it left to following patches to ease the
reviewing.
2024-03-08 10:12:51 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
2408f97652 Recommit [C++20] [Modules] Trying to compare the trailing require clause from the primary template function
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60890.

For the following example:

```
export module a;

export template<typename T>
struct a {
	friend void aa(a) requires(true) {
	}
};
```

```
export module b;

import a;

struct b {
	a<int> m;
};
```

```
export module c;

import a;

struct c {
	void f() const {
		aa(a<int>());
	}
};
```

```
import a;
import b;
import c;

void d() {
	aa(a<int>());
}
```

The current clang will reject this incorrectly. The reason is that the
require clause  will be replaced with the evaluated version
(efae3174f0/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp (L664-L665)).
In module 'b', the friend function is instantiated but not used so the
require clause of the friend function is `(true)`. However, in module
'c', the friend function is used so the require clause is `true`. So
deserializer classify these two function to two different functions
instead of one. Then here is the bug report.

The proposed solution is to try to compare the trailing require clause
of the primary template when performing ODR checking.

Reviewed By: erichkeane

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144626
2023-03-03 17:27:37 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
5bb3253cf5 Revert "[C++20] [Modules] Trying to compare the trailing require clause from the primary template function"
This reverts commit 9e50578ba43c49ee13ac3bb7d4868565824f9b29. Since it
looks like this one prevents us to fix the modular build for libcxx.
2023-03-01 11:04:20 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
9e50578ba4 [C++20] [Modules] Trying to compare the trailing require clause from the primary template function
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60890.

For the following example:

```
export module a;

export template<typename T>
struct a {
	friend void aa(a) requires(true) {
	}
};
```

```
export module b;

import a;

struct b {
	a<int> m;
};
```

```
export module c;

import a;

struct c {
	void f() const {
		aa(a<int>());
	}
};
```

```
import a;
import b;
import c;

void d() {
	aa(a<int>());
}
```

The current clang will reject this incorrectly. The reason is that the
require clause  will be replaced with the evaluated version
(efae3174f0/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp (L664-L665)).
In module 'b', the friend function is instantiated but not used so the
require clause of the friend function is `(true)`. However, in module
'c', the friend function is used so the require clause is `true`. So
deserializer classify these two function to two different functions
instead of one. Then here is the bug report.

The proposed solution is to try to compare the trailing require clause
of the primary template when performing ODR checking.

Reviewed By: erichkeane

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144626
2023-02-28 23:41:48 +08:00