The compiler doesn't know in advance if the streaming and non-streaming
vector-lengths are different, so it should be safe to give a warning
diagnostic to warn the user about possible undefined behaviour. If the
user knows the vector lengths are equal, they can disable the warning
separately.
This diagnostic is one of the ones that GCC also does not have a
warning group for, but a user requested adding a group to control
selectively turning off this diagnostic. So this adds the diagnostic
to a new group, -Wtentative-definition-array
Fixes#87766
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70762 added support for new
loop attribute [[clang::code_align()]].
This patch fixes bugs for the test cases below that misses diagnostics due to discontinue to while loop during checking duplicate vs conflicting code_align attribute values in routine CheckForDuplicateLoopAttrs().
[[clang::code_align(4)]]
[[clang::code_align(4)]]
[[clang::code_align(8)]]
for(int I=0; I<128; ++I) { bar(I); }
[[clang::code_align(4)]]
[[clang::code_align(4)]]
[[clang::code_align(8)]]
[[clang::code_align(32)]]
for(int I=0; I<128; ++I) { bar(I); }
This change makes the `assertion` less strict in `debug` builds by
stripping qualifiers from the base class and ignoring them. I hope
`weakened` assertions don't affect other cases where such `errors` are
intended to be `caught` by the compiler.
Fixes#35603Fixes#85256
In gcc there exist a modifier option -Wformat-signedness that turns on
additional signedness warnings in the already existing -Wformat warning.
This patch implements that support in clang. This is done by adding a dummy
warning diag::warn_format_conversion_argument_type_mismatch_signedness that
is never emitted and only used as an option to toggle the signedness warning
in -Wformat. This will ensure gcc compatibility.
Even if we don't actually use the value of the second argument, we have to evaluate it for side-effects.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Smith <richard@metafoo.co.uk>
This reverts commit ca4c4a6758d184f209cb5d88ef42ecc011b11642.
This was intended not to introduce new consistency diagnostics for
smart pointer types, but failed to ignore sugar around types when
detecting this.
Fixed and test added.
GNU and MSVC have extensions where flexible array members (or their
equivalent) can be in unions or alone in structs. This is already fully
supported in Clang through the 0-sized array ("fake flexible array")
extension or when C99 flexible array members have been syntactically
obfuscated.
Clang needs to explicitly allow these extensions directly for C99
flexible arrays, since they are common code patterns in active use by
the
Linux kernel (and other projects). Such projects have been using either
0-sized arrays (which is considered deprecated in favor of C99 flexible
array members) or via obfuscated syntax, both of which complicate their
code bases.
For example, these do not error by default:
```
union one {
int a;
int b[0];
};
union two {
int a;
struct {
struct { } __empty;
int b[];
};
};
```
But this does:
```
union three {
int a;
int b[];
};
```
Remove the default error diagnostics for this but continue to provide
warnings under Microsoft or GNU extensions checks. This will allow for
a seamless transition for code bases away from 0-sized arrays without
losing existing code patterns. Add explicit checking for the warnings
under various constructions.
Additionally fixes a CodeGen bug with flexible array members in unions
in C++, which was found when adding a testcase for:
```
union { char x[]; } z = {0};
```
which only had Sema tests originally.
Fixes#84565
The latest ACLE allows it and further clarifies the following
in regards to the combination of the two attributes:
"If the `default` matches with another explicitly provided
version in the same translation unit, then the compiler can
emit only one function instead of the two. The explicitly
provided version shall be preferred."
("default" refers to the default clone here)
https://github.com/ARM-software/acle/pull/310
This was a limitation which has now been lifted. Please read the
thread below for more details:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84405#discussion_r1525583647
Basically it allows to separate versioned implementations across
different TUs without having to share private header files which
contain the default declaration.
The ACLE spec has been updated accordingly to make this explicit:
"Each version declaration should be visible at the translation
unit in which the corresponding function version resides."
https://github.com/ARM-software/acle/pull/310
If a resolver is required (because there is a caller in the TU),
then a default declaration is implicitly generated.
We want to add -Wcast-function-type to -Wextra (as done in
1de7e6c8cba27296f3fc16d107822ea0ee856759), but we do not want to add
-Wcast-function-type-strict in at the same time
(https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/57/builds/33601/steps/5/logs/stdio).
This moves the existing warning to a new group
(-Wcast-function-type-mismatch), puts the new group under the existing
-Wcast-function-type warning group, and adds
-Wcast-function-type-mismatch to -Wextra.
The -Wcast-fuction-type-strict has been moved under dignstic group
-Wextra.
Edited the test cases for -Wcast-fuction-type-strict and
-Wcast-fuction-type in Sema an SemaCXX.
Added a new test case which include a functionality that was already in
the -Wextra group, i.e -Wignored-qualifiers with
-Wcast-fuction-type-strict.
Fixes: #76872
In `-fbounds-safety`, bounds annotations are considered type attributes
rather than declaration attributes. Constructing them as type attributes
allows us to extend the attribute to apply nested pointers, which is
essential to annotate functions that involve out parameters: `void
foo(int *__counted_by(*out_count) *out_buf, int *out_count)`.
We introduce a new sugar type to support bounds annotated types,
`CountAttributedType`. In order to maintain extra data (the bounds
expression and the dependent declaration information) that is not
trackable in `AttributedType` we create a new type dedicate to this
functionality.
This patch also extends the parsing logic to parse the `counted_by`
argument as an expression, which will allow us to extend the model to
support arguments beyond an identifier, e.g., `__counted_by(n + m)` in
the future as specified by `-fbounds-safety`.
This also adjusts `__bdos` and array-bounds sanitizer code that already
uses `CountedByAttr` to check `CountAttributedType` instead to get the
field referred to by the attribute.
Fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/85343
When build lambda expression in lambda instantiation, `ThisType` is
required in `Sema::CheckCXXThisCapture` to build `this` capture. Set
`this` type by import `Sema::CXXThisScopeRAII` and it will be used later
in lambda expression transformation.
Co-authored-by: huqizhi <836744285@qq.com>
This is re-working of #74460, which adds a soft-float ABI for AArch64.
That was reverted because it causes errors when building the linux and
fuchsia kernels.
The problem is that GCC's implementation of the ABI compatibility checks
when using the hard-float ABI on a target without FP registers does it's
checks after optimisation. The previous version of this patch reported
errors for all uses of floating-point types, which is stricter than what
GCC does in practice.
This changes two things compared to the first version:
* Only check the types of function arguments and returns, not the types
of other values. This is more relaxed than GCC, while still guaranteeing
ABI compatibility.
* Move the check from Sema to CodeGen, so that inline functions are only
checked if they are actually used. There are some cases in the linux
kernel which depend on this behaviour of GCC.
For the test case in C, both `LV.getLValueOffset()` and
`Ctx.getTypeSizeInChars(Ty)` are zero, so we return `true` from
`isOnePastTheEndOfCompleteObject()` and ultimately diagnose this as
being one past the end, but the diagnostic doesn't make sense.
This pull request fixes#77601 where using the `bitand` operator with
boolean operands should not trigger the warning, as it would indicate an
intentional use of bitwise AND rather than a typo or error.
Fixes#77601
This defines the basic set of pointer authentication clang builtins
(provided in a new header, ptrauth.h), with diagnostics and IRGen
support. The availability of the builtins is gated on a new flag,
`-fptrauth-intrinsics`.
Note that this only includes the basic intrinsics, and notably excludes
`ptrauth_sign_constant`, `ptrauth_type_discriminator`, and
`ptrauth_string_discriminator`, which need extra logic to be fully
supported.
This also introduces clang/docs/PointerAuthentication.rst, which
describes the ptrauth model in general, in addition to these builtins.
Co-Authored-By: Akira Hatanaka <ahatanaka@apple.com>
Co-Authored-By: John McCall <rjmccall@apple.com>
This reverts commit 92a09c0165b87032e1bd05020a78ed845cf35661.
This is triggering a bunch of new -Wnullability-completeness warnings
in code with existing raw pointer nullability annotations.
The intent was the new nullability locations wouldn't affect those
warnings, so this is a bug at least for now.
This enables clang and external nullability checkers to make use of
these annotations on nullable C++ class types like unique_ptr.
These types are recognized by the presence of the _Nullable attribute.
Nullable standard library types implicitly receive this attribute.
Existing static warnings for raw pointers are extended to smart
pointers:
- nullptr used as return value or argument for non-null functions
(`-Wnonnull`)
- assigning or initializing nonnull variables with nullable values
(`-Wnullable-to-nonnull-conversion`)
It doesn't implicitly add these attributes based on the assume_nonnull
pragma, nor warn on missing attributes where the pragma would apply
them.
I'm not confident that the pragma's current behavior will work well for
C++ (where type-based metaprogramming is much more common than C/ObjC).
We'd like to revisit this once we have more implementation experience.
Support can be detected as `__has_feature(nullability_on_classes)`.
This is needed for back-compatibility, as previously clang would issue a
hard error when _Nullable appears on a smart pointer.
UBSan's `-fsanitize=nullability` will not check smart-pointer types.
It can be made to do so by synthesizing calls to `operator bool`, but
that's left for future work.
Discussion:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-allowing-nonnull-etc-on-smart-pointers/77201/26
It's useful to provide an indicator code with the trap, which the generic
__builtin_trap can't do. asm("brk #N") is an option, but following that with a
__builtin_unreachable() leads to two traps when the compiler doesn't know the
block can't return. So compiler support like this is useful.
Try to fix https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/84368
When visiting class members in
`TemplateDeclInstantiator::VisitClassTemplateDecl` during
`Sema::InstantiateClass`, we miss to set attribute of friend declaration
if it is(`isFriend` is true). This will lead to
`Sema::AreConstraintExpressionsEqual` return false when invoked in
`MatchTemplateParameterKind`. Because it makes
`Sema::getTemplateInstantiationArgs` returns incorrect template
argument(`MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList`). When we handle
`CXXRecordDecl` In `Sema::getTemplateInstantiationArgs`, friend
declaration(its parent context is `FileContext`) makes us to choose
`LexicalDeclContext` not `DeclContext` and this is what we want.
Co-authored-by: huqizhi <836744285@qq.com>
C23 6.3.1.8 ‘Usual arithmetic conversions’ p1 states (emphasis mine):
> Otherwise, if the corresponding real type of either operand is
`float`, the other operand is converted, *without change of type
domain*, to a type whose corresponding real type is `float`.
‘type domain’ here refers to `_Complex` vs real (i.e. non-`_Complex`);
there is another clause that states the same for `double`.
Consider the following code:
```c++
_Complex float f;
int x;
f / x;
```
After talking this over with @AaronBallman, we came to the conclusion
that `x` should be converted to `float` and *not* `_Complex float` (that
is, we should perform a division of `_Complex float / float`, and *not*
`_Complex float / _Complex float`; the same also applies to `-+*`). This
was already being done correctly for cases where `x` was already a
`float`; it’s just mixed `_Complex float`+`int` operations that
currently suffer from this problem.
This pr removes the extra `FloatingRealToComplex` conversion that we
were erroneously inserting and adds some tests to make sure we’re
actually doing `_Complex float / float` and not `_Complex float /
_Complex float` (and analogously for `double` and `-+*`).
The only exception here is `float / _Complex float`, which calls a
library function (`__divsc3`) that takes 4 `float`s, so we end up having
to convert the `float` to a `_Complex float` after all (and analogously
for `double`); I don’t believe there is a way around this.
Lastly, we were also missing tests for `_Complex` arithmetic at compile
time, so this adds some tests for that as well.
This pull request fixes#79443 when the cleanup attribute is intended to
be applied to a variable declaration, passing its address to a specified
function. The problem arises when standard functions like free,
closedir, fclose, etc., are used incorrectly with this attribute,
leading to incorrect behavior.
Fixes#79443
Consider the following code:
```c
bool const inf = (1.0/0.0);
```
When trying to emit the initialiser of this variable in C23, we end up
hitting a code path in codegen in `VarDecl::evaluateValueImpl()` where
we check for `IsConstantInitialization && (Ctx.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus
|| Ctx.getLangOpts().C23)`, and if that is the case and we emitted any
notes, constant evaluation fails, and as a result, codegen issues this
error:
```
<source>:1:12: error: cannot compile this static initializer yet
1 | bool const inf = (1.0/0.0);
|
```
As a fix, only fail in C23 mode if we’re initialising a `constexpr`
variable.
This fixes#84784.
Enumerators dont have the type of their enumeration before the closing
brace. In these cases Expr::getEnumCoercedType() incorrectly returned
the enumeration type.
Introduced in PR #81418Fixes#84712
This pull request fixes#72116 where a new flag is introduced for
compatibility with GCC 14, the functionality of -Wreturn-type is
modified to split some of its behaviors into -Wreturn-mismatch
Fixes#72116
This patch adds clang and llvm support for following intrinsic and maps
it to DUPQ instruction:
```
// Variants are also available for:
// _s8, _u16, _s16, _u32, _s32, _u64, _s64
// _bf16, _f16, _f32, _f64
svuint8_t svdup_laneq[_u8](svuint8_t zn, uint64_t imm_idx);
```
Admittedly a bit awkward, `visionos` is the correct and accepted
spelling for annotating availability for xrOS target triples. This patch
detects errors and handles cases when `xros` is mistakenly passed.
In addition, add APIs for introduced/deprecated/obsoleted versioning in
DarwinSDKInfo mappings.
The implementation mostly reuses C++ code paths where possible,
including narrowing check in order to provide diagnostic messages in
case initializer for constexpr variable is not exactly representable in
target type.
The following won't work due to lack of support for other features:
- Diagnosing of underspecified declarations involving constexpr
- Constexpr attached to compound literals
Also due to lack of support for char8_t some of examples with utf-8
strings don't work properly.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64742
Currently using the command `clang -cc1 -triple riscv64` to compile the
code below:
```
#include <riscv_vector.h>
void foo() {
vfloat64m1_t f64m1;
}
```
would get the error message "RISC-V type 'vfloat64m1_t' ... requires the
'zve64x' extension"
which is supposed to be "RISC-V type 'vfloat64m1_t' ... requires the
'zve64d' extension".
Add functionality to APInt::toString() that allows it to insert
separators between groups of digits, using the C++ literal
separator ' between groups.
Fixes issue #58228
Reviewers: @AaronBallman, @cjdb, @tbaederr
IMHO it would be productive to make a similar change for `typeid`, in
`ParseCXXTypeid`, in order to improve Clang's error message for
https://godbolt.org/z/oKKWxeYra
But that might be better done by adding a new DeclaratorContext
specifically for TypeidArg, instead of pretending that the argument to
`typeid` is a template argument, because I don't know what else that
change might affect.
Fixes#77585
This patch allows using the name "rdma" as an alias for "rdm". The name
makes its way to target attributes as well as the command line via the
-march and -mcpu options. The motivation was originally to support this
in Function Multi Versioning but it also makes sense to align with GCC
on the command line.
The patch fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/83407
modifing __builtin_cpu_supports behaviour so that it returns false if
unsupported features names provided in parameter and issue a warning.
__builtin_cpu_supports is target independent, but currently supported by
X86, AArch64 and PowerPC only.
Our implementation previously accepted signed arguments and performed
integer promotion on the argument. GCC's implementation requires an
unsigned argument and does not perform integer promotion on it.
…C mode
Factored logic from `CheckImplicitConversion` into new methods
`Expr::getEnumConstantDecl` and `Expr::getEnumCoercedType` for use in
`checkEnumArithmeticConversions`.
Fix#29217
This include 2 fixes:
1. Disallow 'f' for softfloat.
2. Allow 'r' for softfloat.
Currently, 'f' is accpeted by clang, then LLVM meets an internal error.
'r' is rejected by LLVM by: couldn't allocate input reg for constraint
'r'.
Fixes: #64241, #63632
---------
Co-authored-by: Fangrui Song <i@maskray.me>
