We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.
This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
https://reviews.llvm.org/D131255 (82afc9b169a67e8b8a1862fb9c41a2cd974d6691)
began warning about conversion causing data loss for a single-bit
bit-field. However, after landing the changes, there were reports about
significant false positives from some code bases.
This alters the approach taken in that patch by introducing a new
warning group (-Wsingle-bit-bitfield-constant-conversion) which is
grouped under -Wbitfield-constant-conversion to allow users to
selectively disable the single-bit warning without losing the other
constant conversion warnings.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132851
A one-bit signed bit-field can only hold the values 0 and -1; this
corrects the diagnostic behavior accordingly.
Fixes#53253
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131255
A significant number of our tests in C accidentally use functions
without prototypes. This patch converts the function signatures to have
a prototype for the situations where the test is not specific to K&R C
declarations. e.g.,
void func();
becomes
void func(void);
This is the second batch of tests being updated (there are a significant
number of other tests left to be updated).
Summary:
The diagnostic did not handle ~ well. An expression such as ~0 is often used when 'all ones' is needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24232
llvm-svn: 282156
Silence the -Wbitfield-constant-conversion warning for when -1 or other
negative values are assigned to unsigned bitfields, provided that the bitfield
is wider than the minimum number of bits needed to encode the negative value.
llvm-svn: 277796
Sometimes, char arrays are used as bit storage, with no difference made between
signed and unsigned char. Thus, it is reasonable to use 0 to 255 instead of
-128 to 127 and not trigger this warning.
llvm-svn: 259947
Switch the evaluation from isIntegerConstantExpr to EvaluateAsInt.
EvaluateAsInt will evaluate more types of expressions than
isIntegerConstantExpr.
Move one case from -Wsign-conversion to -Wconstant-conversion. The case is:
1) Source and target types are signed
2) Source type is wider than the target type
3) The source constant value is positive
4) The conversion will store the value as negative in the target.
llvm-svn: 259271
likely be implicitly truncated:
* All forms of Bitwise-and, bitwise-or, and integer multiplication.
* The assignment form of integer addition, subtraction, and exclusive-or
* The RHS of the comma operator
* The LHS of left shifts.
llvm-svn: 178273
of the enumerators rather than the actual expressible range. This is
great when dealing with opaque *values* of that type, but when computing
the range of the type for purposes of converting *into* it, it produces
warnings in cases we don't care about (e.g. enum_t x = 500;). Divide
the logic into these two cases and use the more conservative range for
targets.
llvm-svn: 118735
own subcategory, -Wconstant-conversion, which is on by default.
Tweak the constant folder to give better results in the invalid
case of a negative shift amount.
Implements rdar://problem/6792488
llvm-svn: 118636
