We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.
This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
We currently diagnose static data members directly contained in unnamed classes,
but we should also diagnose when they're in a class that is nested (directly or
indirectly) in an unnamed class. Do this by iterating up the list of parent
DeclContexts and checking if any is an unnamed class.
Similarly also check for function or method DeclContexts (which includes things
like blocks and openmp captured statements) as then the class is considered to
be a local class, which means static data members aren't allowed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80295
MarkVarDeclODRUsed indirectly calls captureInBlock, which creates a copy
expression. The copy expression is insulated in it's own
ExpressionEvaluationContext, so it saves, mutates, and restores MaybeODRUseExprs
as CleanupVarDeclMarking is iterating through it, leading to a crash. Fix this
by iterating through a local copy of MaybeODRUseExprs.
rdar://47493525
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59670
llvm-svn: 357040
The bug is that ExprCleanupObjects isn't always empty
in a fresh evaluation context. New evaluation contexts just
track the current depth of the stack.
The assertion will misfire whenever we finish processing
a function body inside an expression that contained an earlier
block literal with non-trivial captures. That's actually
a lot less likely than you'd think, though, because it has
to be a real function declaration, not just another block.
Mixed block/lambda code would work, as would a template
instantiation or a local class definition.
The code works correctly if the assertion is disabled.
rdar://16356628
llvm-svn: 222194
picking up cleanups from earlier in the statement. Also fix a
crash-on-invalid where a reference to an invalid decl from an
enclosing scope was causing an expression to fail to build, but
only *after* a cleanup was registered from that statement,
causing an assertion downstream.
The crash-on-valid is rdar://13459289.
llvm-svn: 177692
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
specific targets default them to on. Default blocks to on on 10.6 and later.
Add a -fblocks option that allows the user to override the target's default.
Use -fblocks in the various testcases that use blocks.
llvm-svn: 60563
