36 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nick Desaulniers
26181544f7
[clang][VarDecl] Reset un-evaluated constant for all C++ modes (#65818)
After commit 610ec954e1f8 ("[clang] allow const structs/unions/arrays to
be constant expressions for C"), attempts to evaluate
structs/unions/arrays as constants are also performed for C++98 and
C++03.

An assertion was getting tripped up since the potentially-partially
evaluated value was not being reset for those 2 language modes.  Make
sure to reset it now for all C++ modes.

Fixes: #65784
2023-09-11 08:37:01 -07:00
Aaron Ballman
0f1c1be196 [clang] Remove rdar links; NFC
We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.

This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.

Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
2023-08-28 12:13:42 -04:00
Mehdi Amini
e0ac46e69d Revert "Remove rdar links; NFC"
This reverts commit d618f1c3b12effd0c2bdb7d02108d3551f389d3d.
This commit wasn't reviewed ahead of time and significant concerns were
raised immediately after it landed. According to our developer policy
this warrants immediate revert of the commit.

https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch-reversion-policy

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155509
2023-07-17 18:08:04 -07:00
Aaron Ballman
d618f1c3b1 Remove rdar links; NFC
This removes links to rdar, which is an internal bug tracker that the
community doesn't have visibility into.

See further discussion at:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/code-review-reminder-about-links-in-code-commit-messages/71847
2023-07-07 08:41:11 -04:00
Matheus Izvekov
15f3cd6bfc
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could expose a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-27 11:10:54 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere
888673b6e3
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit 7c51f02effdbd0d5e12bfd26f9c3b2ab5687c93f because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was  re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.
2022-07-14 21:17:48 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov
7c51f02eff
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-15 04:16:55 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere
3968936b92
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit bdc6974f92304f4ed542241b9b89ba58ba6b20aa because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.

  import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py

https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/
2022-07-13 09:20:30 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov
bdc6974f92
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-13 02:10:09 +02:00
Yuanfang Chen
27a972a699 Diagnose -Wunused-value based on CFG reachability
(This relands 59337263ab45d7657e and makes sure comma operator
 diagnostics are suppressed in a SFINAE context.)

While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.

This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
2021-09-28 10:00:15 -07:00
Yuanfang Chen
59337263ab Revert "Diagnose -Wunused-value based on CFG reachability"
This reverts commit cbbf2e8c8ae7730ff0121f4868de4a7d188feb65.
It seems causing diagnoses in SFINAE context.
2021-09-23 11:12:00 -07:00
Yuanfang Chen
cbbf2e8c8a Diagnose -Wunused-value based on CFG reachability
While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.

This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
2021-09-22 14:38:06 -07:00
Aaron Ballman
73a8bcd789 Revert "Diagnose -Wunused-value based on CFG reachability"
This reverts commit 63e0d038fc20c894a3d541effa1bc2b1fdea37b9.

It causes test failures:

http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/119/builds/5612
https://logs.chromium.org/logs/fuchsia/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8835548361443044001/+/u/clang/test/stdout
2021-09-21 12:25:13 -04:00
Yuanfang Chen
63e0d038fc Diagnose -Wunused-value based on CFG reachability
While at it, add the diagnosis message "left operand of comma operator has no effect" (used by GCC) for comma operator.

This also makes Clang diagnose in the constant evaluation context which aligns with GCC/MSVC behavior. (https://godbolt.org/z/7zxb8Tx96)

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103938
2021-09-20 10:43:34 -07:00
Zequan Wu
e56e7bd469 Revert "Revert "Ensure that checkInitIsICE is called exactly once for every variable""
This reverts commit a2ac64dd905422ed84e273a98d846df022a5e2ec.
2020-10-26 12:08:57 -07:00
Zequan Wu
a2ac64dd90 Revert "Ensure that checkInitIsICE is called exactly once for every variable"
This causing `Assertion Result && "Could not evaluate expression"' failed` at https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1142009

This reverts commit 76c0092665867a6defcd328ba0d0d976eb65d991.
2020-10-26 11:59:55 -07:00
Richard Smith
76c0092665 Ensure that checkInitIsICE is called exactly once for every variable
for which it matters.

This is a step towards separating checking for a constant initializer
(in which std::is_constant_evaluated returns true) and any other
evaluation of a variable initializer (in which it returns false).
2020-10-19 19:04:04 -07:00
Richard Smith
552c6c2328 PR44406: Follow behavior of array bound constant folding in more recent versions of GCC.
Old GCC used to aggressively fold VLAs to constant-bound arrays at block
scope in GNU mode. That's non-conforming, and more modern versions of
GCC only do this at file scope. Update Clang to do the same.

Also promote the warning for this from off-by-default to on-by-default
in all cases; more recent versions of GCC likewise warn on this by
default.

This is still slightly more permissive than GCC, as pointed out in
PR44406, as we still fold VLAs to constant arrays in structs, but that
seems justifiable given that we don't support VLA-in-struct (and don't
intend to ever support it), but GCC does.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89523
2020-10-16 14:34:35 -07:00
Richard Smith
6f33936719 Explain why the array bound is non-constant in VLA diagnostics.
In passing, also use a more precise diagnostic to explain why an
expression is not an ICE if it's not of integral type.
2020-08-19 15:45:51 -07:00
Richard Smith
187ffb4a8e PR31701: Fix crash on invalid caused by parsing a dependent initializer when we
don't know we're in a dependent context.

llvm-svn: 292561
2017-01-20 01:19:46 +00:00
Richard Smith
5c40f09b3d Don't assert if evaluation of an expression that we're syntactically required
to treat as an ICE results in undefined behavior. Instead, return the "natural"
result of the operation (signed wraparound / inf / nan).

llvm-svn: 254699
2015-12-04 03:00:44 +00:00
Argyrios Kyrtzidis
90181d6180 [Sema] Fix assertion hit while trying to do constant evaluation for a dependent expression
inside a GNU statement expression.

rdar://16064952

llvm-svn: 201468
2014-02-15 18:53:57 +00:00
Richard Smith
f137f9317b PR18283: If a const variable of integral or enumeration type is
initialized from a constant expression in C++98, it can be used in
constant expressions, even if it was brace-initialized. Patch by
Rahul Jain!

llvm-svn: 200098
2014-01-25 20:50:08 +00:00
Dmitri Gribenko
1cd2305703 Change the wording of the extension warning from
> 'long long' is an extension when C99 mode is not enabled
to
> 'long long' is a C++11 extension
while compiling in C++98 mode.

llvm-svn: 164545
2012-09-24 18:19:21 +00:00
Eli Friedman
ea90a40339 Fix test so it works the same way on 32-bit and 64-bit.
llvm-svn: 160415
2012-07-18 01:03:11 +00:00
Eli Friedman
4eafb6b77b Don't treat overflow in floating-point conversions as a hard error in constant evaluation. <rdar://problem/11874571>.
llvm-svn: 160394
2012-07-17 21:03:05 +00:00
John McCall
3c79d88f06 Fix a crash-on-invalid where the constant evaluator would try to
evaluate certain expressions involving invalidly-defined classes.

llvm-svn: 155645
2012-04-26 18:10:01 +00:00
Richard Smith
2ec4061e39 Pedantic diagnostic correction: in C++, we have integral constant expressions,
not integer constant expressions. In passing, fix the 'folding is an extension'
diagnostic to not claim we're accepting the code, since that's not true in
-pedantic-errors mode, and add this diagnostic to -Wgnu.

llvm-svn: 148209
2012-01-15 03:51:30 +00:00
Richard Smith
d0b4dd656d constexpr handling improvements. Produce detailed diagnostics when a 'constexpr'
variable is initialized by a non-constant expression, and pass in the variable
being declared so that earlier-initialized fields' values can be used.

Rearrange VarDecl init evaluation to make this possible, and in so doing fix a
long-standing issue in our C++ constant expression handling, where we would
mishandle cases like:

  extern const int a;
  const int n = a;
  const int a = 5;
  int arr[n];

Here, n is not initialized by a constant expression, so can't be used in an ICE,
even though the initialization expression would be an ICE if it appeared later
in the TU. This requires computing whether the initializer is an ICE eagerly,
and saving that information in PCH files.

llvm-svn: 146856
2011-12-19 06:19:21 +00:00
Richard Smith
0b973d091a PR11604: don't allow floating-literal-to-integer casts in ICEs if the (truncated)
floating literal value does not fit into the destination type. Such casts have
undefined behavior at translation time; treating them as non-ICE matches the
behavior of modern gcc versions.

llvm-svn: 146842
2011-12-18 02:33:09 +00:00
Richard Smith
ec8dcd2716 Fix a cluster of related issues involving value-dependence and constant
expression evaluation:
 - When folding a non-value-dependent expression, we may try to use the
   initializer of a value-dependent variable. If that happens, give up.
 - In C++98, actually check that a const, non-volatile DeclRefExpr inside an ICE
   is of integral or enumeration type (a reference isn't OK!)
 - In C++11, DeclRefExprs for objects of const literal type initialized with
   value-dependent expressions are themselves value-dependent.
 - So are references initialized with value-dependent expressions (though this
   case is missing from the C++11 standard, along with many others).

llvm-svn: 144056
2011-11-08 01:31:09 +00:00
Richard Smith
725810a2bb Split apart the state accumulated during constant expression evaluation and the
end result. Use this split to propagate state information and diagnostics
through more of constant expression evaluation.

llvm-svn: 142159
2011-10-16 21:26:27 +00:00
John McCall
d3dfbd6f4f If a switch condition is constant, don't warn about missing enum cases.
If a switch condition is constant, warn if there's no case for it.

Constant switch conditions do come up in reasonable template code.

llvm-svn: 104010
2010-05-18 03:19:21 +00:00
Douglas Gregor
c1cf814c8b Fix a few cases where enum constant handling was using
ASTContext::getTypeSize() rather than ASTContext::getIntWidth() for
the width of an integral type. The former includes padding for bools
(to the target's size) while the latter does not, so we woud end up
zero-extending bools to the target width when we shouldn't. Fixes a
crash-on-valid in the included test.

llvm-svn: 101372
2010-04-15 15:53:31 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar
8fbe78f6fc Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
   which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
   can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
   a default target).

llvm-svn: 91446
2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00
Sebastian Redl
a81b0b7ef5 Add a big test case for I-C-Es in C++, and a fix to make it work. The fix might not be the right way to do it.
llvm-svn: 72490
2009-05-27 19:34:06 +00:00