We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.
This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
C89 allowed a type specifier to be elided with the resulting type being
int, aka implicit int behavior. This feature was subsequently removed
in C99 without a deprecation period, so implementations continued to
support the feature. Now, as with implicit function declarations, is a
good time to reevaluate the need for this support.
This patch allows -Wimplicit-int to issue warnings in C89 mode (off by
default), defaults the warning to an error in C99 through C17, and
disables support for the feature entirely in C2x. It also removes a
warning about missing declaration specifiers that really was just an
implicit int warning in disguise and other minor related cleanups.
-Wfor-loop-analysis warnings for a for-loop with a condition variable. In such
a case, the loop condition variable is modified on each iteration of the loop
by definition.
Original commit message:
Rearrange condition handling so that semantic checks on a condition variable
are performed before the other substatements of the construct are parsed,
rather than deferring them until the end. This allows better error recovery
from semantic errors in the condition, improves diagnostic order, and is a
prerequisite for C++17 constexpr if.
llvm-svn: 273600
are performed before the other substatements of the construct are parsed,
rather than deferring them until the end. This allows better error recovery
from semantic errors in the condition, improves diagnostic order, and is a
prerequisite for C++17 constexpr if.
llvm-svn: 273548
The motivation is to fix a crash on
struct S {} s;
Foo S::~S() { s.~S(); }
What was happening here was that S::~S() was marked as invalid since its
return type is invalid, and as a consequence CheckFunctionDeclaration() wasn't
called and S::~S() didn't get merged into S's implicit destructor. This way,
the class ended up with two destructors, which confused the overload printer
when it suddenly had to print two possible destructors for `s.~S()`.
In addition to fixing the crash, this change also seems to improve diagnostics
in a few other places, see test changes.
Crash found by SLi's bot.
llvm-svn: 229639
If source code is invalid, error recovery can lead to name lookup in a set containing invalid declaration. The lookup is stopped once found such declaration, but LookupResult object could remain in inconsistent state. Its destructor triggered a check, which caused assert violation.
This patch fixes PR16964 and PR12791.
llvm-svn: 189916
