We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.
This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
We collect the source location of a trailing return type in the parser,
improving the location for regular functions and providing a location
for lambdas, where previously there was none.
Fixes PR47732.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90129
function-style cast to a non-dependent type which is then used in an invalid
way. We'd lose the "type dependent" bit here, and downstream Sema processing
would then discard the expression if it was used in a context where its type
rendered it invalid.
llvm-svn: 274267
r185773 added an assert that checked that a CXXUnresolvedConstructExpr either
has a valid rparen, or exactly one argument. This doesn't have to be true for
invalid inputs. Convert the assert to an if, and add a test for this case.
Found by SLi's afl bot.
llvm-svn: 225140
In code such as "char* volatile const j()", Clang warns that "volatile
const" will be ignored. Make it point to the first ignored qualifier,
and simplify the code a bit.
llvm-svn: 132563
diagnose ignored qualifiers on return types, only assume that there is
a pointer chunk if the type is *structurally* a pointer type, not if
it's a typedef of a pointer type. Fixes PR9328/<rdar://problem/9055428>.
llvm-svn: 126751
several ways. We now warn for more of the return types, and correctly
locate the ignored ones. Also adds fix-it hints to remove the ignored
qualifiers. Fixes much of PR9058, although not all of it.
Patch by Hans Wennborg, a couple of minor style tweaks from me.
llvm-svn: 126321
This flag and warning match GCC semantics. Also, move it to -Wextra as this is
a largely cosmetic issue and doesn't seem to mask problems. Subsequent fixes to
the tests which no longer by default emit the warning. Added explicit test
cases for both C and C++ behavior with the warning turned on.
llvm-svn: 108325
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
of the flow-control checks for falling off the end of a function,
since the return type may instantiate to void. Similarly, if a
return statement has an expression and the return type of the function
is void, don't complain if the expression is type-dependent, since
that type could instantiate to void.
Fixes PR5071.
llvm-svn: 83222
value. This is on by default, and controlled by -Wreturn-type (-Wmost
-Wall). I believe there should be very few false positives, though
the most interesting case would be:
int() { bar(); }
when bar does:
bar() { while (1) ; }
Here, we assume functions return, unless they are marked with the
noreturn attribute. I can envision a fixit note for functions that
never return normally that don't have a noreturn attribute to add a
noreturn attribute.
If anyone spots other false positives, let me know!
llvm-svn: 76821
