This change aims to fix
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/70375
It appears to me that the logic here should be handling specializations
in general, not just partial specialization. It also seems that both the
comment before the block and the `isInstantiationOf(ClassTemplate,
SpecTemplate)` below agree with my judgement.
The issue might just be a mistake that someone mistaken specialization
as a special case of partial specializations, while it's actually the
other way around.
Needs some experts to comment here if this is the right fix.
The code that caused clang ICE is added as a test case.
templates.
For example, this now type-checks (but does not instantiate the body
of deref<int>):
template<typename T> T& deref(T* t) { return *t; }
void test(int *ip) {
int &ir = deref(ip);
}
Specific changes/additions:
* Template argument deduction from a call to a function template.
* Instantiation of a function template specializations (just the
declarations) from the template arguments deduced from a call.
* FunctionTemplateDecls are stored directly in declaration contexts
and found via name lookup (all forms), rather than finding the
FunctionDecl and then realizing it is a template. This is
responsible for most of the churn, since some of the core
declaration matching and lookup code assumes that all functions are
FunctionDecls.
llvm-svn: 74213
become useful or correct until we (1) parse template arguments
correctly, (2) have some way to turn template-ids into types,
declarators, etc., and (3) have a real representation of templates.
llvm-svn: 61208
