Reapplication of 7339c0f782d5c70e0928f8991b0c05338a90c84c with a fix
for a crash involving arrays without a size expression.
Clang supports VLAs in C++ as an extension, but we currently only warn
on their use when you pass -Wvla, -Wvla-extension, or -pedantic.
However, VLAs as they're expressed in C have been considered by WG21
and rejected, are easy to use accidentally to the surprise of users
(e.g., https://ddanilov.me/default-non-standard-features/), and they
have potential security implications beyond constant-size arrays
(https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/ARR32-C.+Ensure+size+arguments+for+variable+length+arrays+are+in+a+valid+range).
C++ users should strongly consider using other functionality such as
std::vector instead.
This seems like sufficiently compelling evidence to warn users about
VLA use by default in C++ modes. This patch enables the -Wvla-extension
diagnostic group in C++ language modes by default, and adds the warning
group to -Wall in GNU++ language modes. The warning is still opt-in in
C language modes, where support for VLAs is somewhat less surprising to
users.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-diagnosing-use-of-vlas-in-c/73109
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/62836
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156565
This commit implements [temp.deduct]p9.
Test updates include:
- New notes in `cxx1y-init-captures.cpp`, `lambda-expressions.cpp`
and 'warn-unused-lambda-capture.cpp'.
This seems to be caused by diagnosing errors earlier (during
deduction) that were previously surfaced later (during
instantiation).
- New error `lambda-unevaluated.cpp` is in line with [temp.deduct]p9.
Reviewed By: erichkeane, #clang-language-wg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148802
Combined with 'da98651 - Revert "DR2064:
decltype(E) is only a dependent', this change (5a391d3) caused verifier
errors when building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/1168494#c1 for a
reproducer.
Additionally it reverts changes that were dependent on this one, see
below.
> Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer
> to dependent declarations.
>
> Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
> function as being instantiation-dependent.
>
> This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
> declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
> Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
> instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
> of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
> dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
> treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
> involving such dependent declarations.
>
> This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
> imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
> early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
> when handling the template.
>
> Previously committed as 8c1f2d15b826591cdf6bd6b468b8a7d23377b29e, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted.
This reverts commit 5a391d38ac6c561ba908334d427f26124ed9132e.
It also restores clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp to its state before
da986511fb9da1a46a0ca4dba2e49e2426036303.
Revert "[c++20] P1907R1: Support for generalized non-type template arguments of scalar type."
> Previously committed as 9e08e51a20d0d2b1c5724bb17e969d036fced4cd, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
> following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
>
> 7e84aa1b81e72d44bcc58ffe1731bfc7abb73ce0 by Simon Pilgrim
> ed13d8c66781b50ff007cb089c5905f9bb9e8af2 by me
> 95c7b6cadbc9a3d4376ef44edbeb3c8bb5b8d7fc by Sam McCall
> 430d5d8429473c2b10b109991d7577a3cea41140 by Dave Zarzycki
This reverts commit 4b574008aef5a7235c1f894ab065fe300d26e786.
Revert "[msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay"
> [msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay
> applied to an array the same as the array itself.
>
> This follows MS ABI, and corrects a regression from the implementation
> of generalized non-type template parameters, where we "forgot" how to
> mangle this case.
This reverts commit 18e093faf726d15f210ab4917142beec51848258.
to dependent declarations.
Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
function as being instantiation-dependent.
This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
involving such dependent declarations.
This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
when handling the template.
Previously committed as 8c1f2d15b826591cdf6bd6b468b8a7d23377b29e, and
reverted because a dependency commit was reverted.
This reverts commit 8c1f2d15b826591cdf6bd6b468b8a7d23377b29e.
This is part of 5 commits being reverted due to https://crbug.com/1161059. See bug for repro.
to dependent declarations.
Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
function as being instantiation-dependent.
This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
involving such dependent declarations.
This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
when handling the template.
This reverts commit r337152. This applies to non-constants too. The real
explanation is that the capture is not ODR-used, but putting that into
the warning message seems ... worse.
llvm-svn: 337278
This is one of the darker corners of C++, make it clear that this is
about constants and rephrase it a bit.
Before: lambda capture 'i' is not required to be captured for this use
After: lambda capture of constant 'i' is not required for this use
llvm-svn: 337152
Summary:
Clang was crashing when diagnosing an unused-lambda-capture for a VLA because
From.getVariable() is null for the capture of a VLA bound.
Warning about the VLA bound capture is not helpful, so only warn for the VLA
itself.
Fixes: PR35555
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, dim, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, dim
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41016
llvm-svn: 320396
Summary:
Don't warn about unused lambda captures that involve copying a
value of a type that cannot be trivially copied and destroyed.
Fixes PR31977
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30327
llvm-svn: 296602
Summary:
The warning doesn't know why the variable was looked up but not
odr-used, so reword it to not claim that it was used in an unevaluated
context.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28902
llvm-svn: 292498
Summary:
Warn when a lambda explicitly captures something that is not used in its body.
The warning is part of -Wunused and can be enabled with -Wunused-lambda-capture.
Reviewers: rsmith, arphaman, jbcoe, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Quuxplusone, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28467
llvm-svn: 291905
