This is not a pure revert of c929bcb7d85700494217f3a2148549f8757e0eed.
It also includes a bug fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136029
Scudo is supposed to allocate any blocks across the entired mapped
pages and each page is equally likely to be selected. Which means Scudo
is leaning to touch as many pages as possible. This brings better
security but it also sacrifices the chance of releasing dirty pages.
To alleviate the unmanagable footprint growing, this CL introduces the
BatchGroup concept. Each blocks will be classified into a BatchGroup
according to its address. While allocation, we are leaning to allocate
blocks in the same group first. Note that the blocks selected from a
group is still random over several pages. At the same time, we have
better prediction of dirty page growing speed. Besides, we are able to
do partial page releasing by examing part of BatchGroups.
Reviewed By: cryptoad, cferris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133897
Summary:
This CL makes unit tests compatible with Fuchsia's zxtest. This
required a few changes here and there, but also unearthed some
incompatibilities that had to be addressed.
A header is introduced to allow to account for the zxtest/gtest
differences, some `#if SCUDO_FUCHSIA` are used to disable incompatible
code (the 32-bit primary, or the exclusive TSD).
It also brought to my attention that I was using
`__scudo_default_options` in different tests, which ended up in a
single binary, and I am not sure how that ever worked. So move
this to the main cpp.
Additionally fully disable the secondary freelist on Fuchsia as we do
not track VMOs for secondary allocations, so no release possible.
With some modifications to Scudo's BUILD.gn in Fuchsia:
```
[==========] 79 tests from 23 test cases ran (10280 ms total).
[ PASSED ] 79 tests
```
Reviewers: mcgrathr, phosek, hctim, pcc, eugenis, cferris
Subscribers: srhines, jfb, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70682
Summary:
Apparently during the review of D69265, and my flailing around with
git, a somewhat important line disappeared.
On top of that, there was no test exercising that code path, and
while writing the follow up patch I intended to write, some `CHECK`s
were failing.
Re-add the missing line, and add a test that fails without said line.
Reviewers: hctim, morehouse, pcc, cferris
Reviewed By: hctim
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69529
Summary:
This is a clean patch using the last diff of D69265, but using git
instead of svn, since svn went ro and arc was making my life harded
than it needed to be.
I was going to introduce a couple more lists and realized that our
lists are currently a bit all over the place. While we have a singly
linked list type relatively well defined, we are using doubly linked
lists defined on the fly for the stats and for the secondary blocks.
This CL adds a doubly linked list object, reorganizing the singly list
one to extract as much of the common code as possible. We use this
new type in the stats and the secondary. We also reorganize the list
tests to benefit from this consolidation.
There are a few side effect changes such as using for iterator loops
that are, in my opinion, cleaner in a couple of places.
Reviewers: hctim, morehouse, pcc, cferris
Reviewed By: hctim
Subscribers: jfb, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69516
