5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song
d5d420bb3b [flang][test] Remove RUN LINES?/EXPECTED OUTPUT.*/INPUT markers from test/Driver
Follow-up to D128763.
2022-06-29 22:08:02 -07:00
Nico Weber
648feabc65 [clang] Make the driver not diagnose errors on nonexistent linker inputs
When nonexistent linker inputs are passed to the driver, the linker
now errors out, instead of the compiler. If the linker does not run,
clang now emits a "warning: linker input unused" instead of an error
for nonexistent files.

The motivation for this change is that I noticed that
`clang-cl /winsysroot sysroot main.cc ole32.lib` emitted a
"ole32.lib not found" error, even though the linker finds it just fine when
I run `clang-cl /winsysroot sysroot main.cc /link ole32.lib`.

The same problem occurs if running `clang-cl main.cc ole32.lib` in a
non-MSVC shell.

The problem is that DiagnoseInputExistence() only looked for libs in %LIB%,
but MSVCToolChain uses much more involved techniques.

For this particular problem, we could make DiagnoseInputExistence() ask
the toolchain to see if it can find a .lib file, but in general the
driver can't know what the linker will do to find files, so it shouldn't
try. For example, if we implement PR24616, lld-link will look in the
registry to determine a good default for %LIB% if it isn't set.

This is less or a problem for the gcc driver, since .a paths there are
either passed via -l flags (which honor -L), or via a qualified path
(that doesn't honor -L) -- but for example ld.lld's --chroot flag
can also trigger this problem. Without this patch,
`clang -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,--chroot,some/dir /file.o` will complain that
`/file.o` doesn't exist, even though
`clang -fuse-ld=lld -Wl,--chroot,some/dir -Wl,/file.o` succeeds just fine.

This implements rnk's suggestion on the old bug PR27234.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109624
2021-09-13 08:57:38 -04:00
Andrzej Warzynski
5437f2e9a9 [flang][nfc] Remove flang-new-driver from LIT
After merging https://reviews.llvm.org/D105811, `flang-new-driver` is no
longer required.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107990
2021-08-13 08:17:40 +00:00
Andrzej Warzynski
808a5a2534 [flang][driver] Remove %flang-new from the LIT configuration
`%flang-new` was introduced in the early days of the new driver to make
a clear distinction between the tests for the current and the new
driver. We have since introduced `%flang` (compiler driver) and
`%flang_fc1` (frontend driver) as the long term solution. This has allowed
us to share tests between `flang-new` and `f18`. This patch replaces
all uses of `%flang-new` with `%flang` and `%flang_fc1`.

Some tests are reformatted so that all tests look uniform and are easier
to follow. Where possible, `! REQUIRES: new-flang-driver` is deleted so
that more tests can be shared with `f18`. To facilitate this,
`f{no-}implicit-none` are introduced in `f18` with semantics identical
to `flang-new`.

Two tests are deleted rather than updated:
  * flang/test/Frontend/print-preprocess-C-file.f90
  * flang/test/Frontend/print-preprocessed-file.f90
Instead, there is plenty of preprocessor tests in
flang/test/Preprocessing/.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100174
2021-04-13 10:55:01 +00:00
Andrzej Warzynski
45da495f73 [flang][driver] Merge test/Driver and test/Flang-Driver directories
Until now we've been maintaining 2 test directories for Flang's drivers:
  * test/Driver for `f18` (the current driver)
  * test/Flang-Driver for `flang-new` (the new driver)
As we have started sharing tests between the drivers, this separation is
no longer required. This patch merges the two test directories. As
suggested in the review, moving forward we'll avoid having tests
specifically for the old driver.

A few notable changes:
  * Driver/version-test.f90 and Driver/no-files.f90 are deleted. The
  versions for the new driver are more robust, but tricky to share.
  * Driver/write-module.f90 is deleted in favour of
    Flang-Driver/write-module.f90 (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D97197
    for more context)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98257
2021-03-10 11:38:13 +00:00