4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sourabh Singh Tomar
698bf3dafc
[flang][OpenMP] Fix for #86393 (#87452) 2024-04-04 09:27:57 +05:30
Tom Eccles
3deaa77f1a
[flang][OpenMP] simplify getReductionName (#85666)
Re-use fir::getTypeAsString instead of creating something new here. This
spells integer names like i32 instead of i_32 so there is a lot of test
churn.
2024-03-20 15:47:00 +00:00
Sergio Afonso
d84252e064
[MLIR][OpenMP] NFC: Uniformize OpenMP ops names (#85393)
This patch proposes the renaming of certain OpenMP dialect operations with the
goal of improving readability and following a uniform naming convention for
MLIR operations and associated classes. In particular, the following operations
are renamed:

- `omp.map_info` -> `omp.map.info`
- `omp.target_update_data` -> `omp.target_update`
- `omp.ordered_region` -> `omp.ordered.region`
- `omp.cancellationpoint` -> `omp.cancellation_point`
- `omp.bounds` -> `omp.map.bounds`
- `omp.reduction.declare` -> `omp.declare_reduction`

Also, the following MLIR operation classes have been renamed:

- `omp::TaskLoopOp` -> `omp::TaskloopOp`
- `omp::TaskGroupOp` -> `omp::TaskgroupOp`
- `omp::DataBoundsOp` -> `omp::MapBoundsOp`
- `omp::DataOp` -> `omp::TargetDataOp`
- `omp::EnterDataOp` -> `omp::TargetEnterDataOp`
- `omp::ExitDataOp` -> `omp::TargetExitDataOp`
- `omp::UpdateDataOp` -> `omp::TargetUpdateOp`
- `omp::ReductionDeclareOp` -> `omp::DeclareReductionOp`
- `omp::WsLoopOp` -> `omp::WsloopOp`
2024-03-20 11:19:38 +00:00
Tom Eccles
197f3ecf92
[flang][OpenMP] lower simple array reductions (#84958)
This has been tested with arrays with compile-time constant bounds.
Allocatable arrays and arrays with non-constant bounds are not yet
supported. User-defined reduction functions are also not yet supported.

The design is intended to work for arrays with non-constant bounds too
without a lot of extra work (mostly there are bugs in OpenMPIRBuilder I
haven't fixed yet).

We need some way to get these runtime bounds into the reduction init and
combiner regions. To keep things simple for now I opted to always box
the array arguments so the box can be passed as one argument and the
lower bounds and extents read from the box. This has the disadvantage of
resulting in fir.box_dim operations inside of the critical section. If
these prove to be a performance issue, we could follow OpenACC reading
box lower bounds and extents before the reduction and passing them as
block arguments to the reduction init and combiner regions. I would
prefer to keep things simple for now.

Note: this implementation only works when the HLFIR lowering is used. I
don't think it is worth supporting FIR-only lowering because the plan is
for that to be removed soon.

OpenMP array reductions 6/6
Previous PR: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84957
2024-03-20 10:35:11 +00:00