9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikolas Klauser
580f60484e
[libc++][NFC] Merge is{,_nothrow,_trivially}{,_copy,_move,_default}{_assignable,_constructible} (#85308)
These headers have become very small by using compiler builtins, often
containing only two declarations. This merges these headers, since
there doesn't seem to be much of a benefit keeping them separate.

Specifically, `is_{,_nothrow,_trivially}{assignable,constructible}` are
kept and the `copy`, `move` and `default` versions of these type traits
are moved in to the respective headers.
2024-03-18 08:29:44 +01:00
Hui
1f613bce19
[libc++] refactor cxx_atomic_wait to make it reusable for atomic_ref (#81427)
The goal of this patch is to make `atomic`'s wait functions to be
reusable by `atomic_ref`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76647

First, this patch is built on top of
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80596 , to reduce the future
merge conflicts.

This patch made the following functions as "API"s to be used by
`atomic`, `atomic_flag`, `semaphore`, `latch`, `atomic_ref`

```
__atomic_wait
__atomic_wait_unless
__atomic_notify_one
__atomic_notify_all
```

These functions are made generic to support `atomic` type and
`atomic_ref`. There are two customisation points.

```
// How to load the value from the given type (with a memory order)
__atomic_load
```


```
// what is the contention address that the platform `wait` function is going to monitor
__atomic_contention_address
```


For `atomic_ref` (not implemented in this patch), the `load` and
`address` function will be different, because
- it does not use the "atomic abstraction layer" so the `load` operation
will be some gcc builtin
- the contention address will be the user's actual type that the
`atomic_ref` is pointing to
2024-03-02 14:50:52 +00:00
Louis Dionne
9783f28cbb
[libc++] Format the code base (#74334)
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.

This patch was generated with:

   find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
      | grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
      | grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
      | grep -v 'README.txt' \
      | grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
      | grep -v '__config_site.in' \
      | xargs clang-format -i

A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.

[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
2023-12-18 14:01:33 -05:00
Louis Dionne
208a6d97f5
[libc++] Fix inconsistency between is_lock_free and is_always_lock_free (#68109)
std::atomic is implemented with the following (confusing!) hierarchy of
types:

     std::atomic<T> : std::__atomic_base<T> { ... };
     std::__atomic_base<T> {
          std::__cxx_atomic_impl<T> __impl;
     };
     std::__cxx_atomic_impl<T> {
          _Atomic(T) __val;
     };

Inside std::__atomic_base, we implement the is_lock_free() and
is_always_lock_free() functions. However, we used to implement them
inconsistently:
- is_always_lock_free() is based on whether __cxx_atomic_impl<T> is
always lock free (using the builtin), which means that we include any
potential padding added by _Atomic(T) into the determination.
- is_lock_free() was based on whether T is lock free (using the
builtin), which meant that we did not take into account any potential
padding added by _Atomic(T).

It is important to note that the padding added by _Atomic(T) can turn a
type that wouldn't be lock free into a lock free type, for example by
making its size become a power of two.

The inconsistency of how the two functions were implemented could lead
to cases where is_always_lock_free() would return true, but
is_lock_free() would then return false. This is the case for example of
the following type, which is always lock free on arm64 but was
incorrectly reported as !is_lock_free() before this patch:

     struct Foo { float x[3]; };

This patch switches the determination of is_lock_free() to be based on
__cxx_atomic_impl<T> instead to match how we determine
is_always_lock_free().

rdar://115324353
2023-10-18 19:58:24 -07:00
Nikolas Klauser
c04bcadf30 [libc++][NFC] Use _LIBCPP_STD_VER instead of __cpp_lib_atomic_is_always_lock_free
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Mordante

Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150421
2023-05-13 16:27:03 -07:00
Mark de Wever
f41f392520 [libc++] Fixes operator& hijacking atomic types.
This uses std::addressof everywherein atomic. This is not strictly
needed for the integral and floating point specializations. They should
not be used by user defined types. But it's easier to fix everything.

Note these changes are made using a WIP clang-tidy plugin.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144786
2023-02-27 19:23:13 +01:00
Nikolas Klauser
7ced7e84c0 [libc++][NFC] Replace typedef with using declarations in <__atomic/*>
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc

Spies: arichardson, libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144259
2023-02-22 14:49:39 +01:00
Nikolas Klauser
ef3a3b0726 [libc++][NFC] Replace _VSTD and _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY in <__atomic/*>
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc

Spies: libcxx-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144258
2023-02-17 21:54:07 +01:00
Nikolas Klauser
46db8d822e [libc++] Granularize <atomic>
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc

Spies: arichardson, libcxx-commits, krytarowski

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142972
2023-02-17 12:44:32 +01:00