This was actually already implemented in the initial version of
std::expected, but this patch adds test coverage and makes it more
explicit that we intend to make these functions noexcept.
These headers have become very small by using compiler builtins, often
containing only two declarations. This merges these headers, since
there doesn't seem to be much of a benefit keeping them separate.
Specifically, `is_{,_nothrow,_trivially}{assignable,constructible}` are
kept and the `copy`, `move` and `default` versions of these type traits
are moved in to the respective headers.
Currently std::expected can have some padding bytes in its tail due to
[[no_unique_address]]. Those padding bytes can be used by other objects.
For example, in the current implementation:
sizeof(std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool>) ==
sizeof(std::expected<std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool>, bool>)
As a result, the data layout of an
std::expected<std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool>, bool>
can look like this:
+-- optional "has value" flag
| +--padding
/---int---\ | |
00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00
| |
| +- "outer" expected "has value" flag
|
+- expected "has value" flag
This is problematic because `emplace()`ing the "inner" expected can not
only overwrite the "inner" expected "has value" flag (issue #68552) but
also the tail padding where other objects might live.
This patch fixes the problem by ensuring that std::expected has no tail
padding, which is achieved by conditional usage of [[no_unique_address]]
based on the tail padding that this would create.
This is an ABI breaking change because the following property changes:
sizeof(std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool>) <
sizeof(std::expected<std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool>, bool>)
Before the change, this relation didn't hold. After the change, the relation
does hold, which means that the size of std::expected in these cases increases
after this patch. The data layout will change in the following cases where
tail padding can be reused by other objects:
class foo : std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool> {
bool b;
};
or using [[no_unique_address]]:
struct foo {
[[no_unique_address]] std::expected<std::optional<int>, bool> e;
bool b;
};
The vendor communication is handled in #70820.
Fixes: #70494
Co-authored-by: philnik777 <nikolasklauser@berlin.de>
Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
The calls to std::construct_at might overwrite the previously set
__has_value_ flag in the case where the flag is overlapping with
the actual value or error being stored (since we use [[no_unique_address]]).
To fix this issue, this patch ensures that we initialize the
__has_value_ flag after we call std::construct_at.
Fixes#68552
POSIX allows certain macros to exist with generic names (i.e. refresh(), move(), and erase()) to exist in `curses.h` which conflict with functions found in std::filesystem, among others. This patch undefs the macros in question and adds them to LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS and LIBCPP_POP_MACROS.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147356
Replace most uses of `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` with
`_LIBCPP_ASSERT_UNCATEGORIZED`.
This is done as a prerequisite to introducing hardened mode to libc++.
The idea is to make enabling assertions an opt-in with (somewhat)
fine-grained controls over which categories of assertions are enabled.
The vast majority of assertions are currently uncategorized; the new
macro will allow turning on `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` (the underlying mechanism
for all kinds of assertions) without enabling all the uncategorized
assertions (in the future; this patch preserves the current behavior).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153816
This reverts commit ebc111b08bddca55d5f7e560a20bdb2c913d80cb.
Sorry, I forgot to append Phabricator reversion when land D140911, I try to revert this change and reland.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150793
We already have a clang-tidy check for making sure that `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` is on free functions. This patch extends this to class members. The places where we don't check for `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` are classes for which we have an instantiation in the library.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: jplehr, mikhail.ramalho, sstefan1, libcxx-commits, krytarowski, miyuki, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142332
We changed the `abort` calls when trying to throw exceptions in `-fno-exceptions` mode to `__verbose_abort` calls, which removes the dependency in most files.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: dim, emaste, mikhail.ramalho, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146076
This results in proper error messages instead of just an abort.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: #libc_vendors, smeenai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141222
Uses an absolute path to the selected binary.
Updates the formatting of two files to match clang-format-16 style.
Depends on D144126
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144132
Other macros that disable parts of the library are named `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_WHATEVER`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143163
Having an ODR violation with `__exception_guard` seems to be problematic in LTO builds. To avoid the ODR violation, give the class different names for exception/no-exceptions mode and have an alias to the correct class.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, alexfh
Spies: aeubanks, dblaikie, joanahalili, alexfh, rupprecht, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143071
__exception_guard is a no-op in -fno-exceptions mode to produce better code-gen. This means that we don't provide the strong exception guarantees. However, Clang doesn't generate cleanup code with exceptions disabled, so even if we wanted to provide the strong exception guarantees we couldn't. This is also only relevant for constructs with a stack of -fexceptions > -fno-exceptions > -fexceptions code, since the exception can't be caught where exceptions are disabled. While -fexceptions > -fno-exceptions is quite common (e.g. libc++.dylib > -fno-exceptions), having another layer with exceptions enabled seems a lot less common, especially one that tries to catch an exception through -fno-exceptions code.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56783
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, huixie90, #libc
Spies: EricWF, alexfh, hans, joanahalili, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133661
