This fixes two major mistakes in the implementation of
`linear_congruential_engine` that allowed it to produce incorrect
output. Specifically, these mistakes are in `__lce_alg_picker`, which is
used to determine whether Schrage's algorithm is valid and needed.
The first mistake is in the definition of `_OverflowOK`. The code
comment and the description of [D65041](https://reviews.llvm.org/D65041)
both indicate that it's supposed to be true iff `m` is a power of two.
However, the definition used does not work out to that, and instead is
true whenever `m` is even. This could result in
`linear_congruential_engine` using an invalid implementation, as it
would incorrectly assume that any integer overflow can't change the
result. I changed the implementation to one that accurately checks if
`m` is a power of two. Technically, this implementation has an edge case
where it considers `0` to be a power of two, but in this case this is
actually accurate behavior, as `m = 0` indicates a modulus of 2^w where
w is the size of `result_type` in bits, which *is* a power of two.
The second mistake is in the static assert. The original static assert
erroneously included an unnecessary `a != 0 || m != 0`. Combined with
the `|| !_MightOverflow`, this actually resulted in the static assert
being impossible to fail. Applying De Morgan's law and expanding
`_MightOverflow` gives that the only way this static assert can be
triggered is if `a == 0 && m == 0 && a != 0 && m != 0 && ...`, which
clearly cannot be true. I simply removed the explicit checks against `a`
and `m`, as the intended checks are already included in `_MightOverflow`
and `_SchrageOK`, and their inclusion doesn't provide any obvious
semantic benefit.
This should fix all the current instances where
`linear_congruential_engine` uses an invalid implementation. This
technically isn't a complete implementation, though, since the static
assert will cause some instantiations of `linear_congruential_engine`
not disallowed by the standard from compiling. However, this should
still be an improvement, as all compiling instantiations of
`linear_congruential_engine` should use a valid implementation. Fixing
the cases where the static assert triggers will require adding
additional implementations, some of which will be fairly non-trivial, so
I'd rather leave those for another PR so they don't hold up these more
important fixes.
Fixes#33554
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
In preparation for running clang-format on the whole code base, we are
also removing mentions of the legacy _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY macro in
favor of the newer _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI.
We're still leaving the definition of _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to avoid
creating needless breakage in case some older patches are checked-in
with mentions of the old macro. After we branch for LLVM 18, we can do
another pass to clean up remaining uses of the macro that might have
gotten introduced by mistake (if any) and remove the macro itself at the
same time. This is just a minor convenience to smooth out the transition
as much as possible.
See
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
for the clang-format proposal.
This brings most of the enable_ifs in libc++ to the same style. It also has the nice side-effect of reducing the size of names of these symbols, since the arguments don't get mangled anymore.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157748
This brings most of the enable_ifs in libc++ to the same style. It also has the nice side-effect of reducing the size of names of these symbols, since the depedent return type is shorter.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157736
We already have a clang-tidy check for making sure that `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` is on free functions. This patch extends this to class members. The places where we don't check for `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` are classes for which we have an instantiation in the library.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: jplehr, mikhail.ramalho, sstefan1, libcxx-commits, krytarowski, miyuki, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142332
This should make CI consistent on all the compilers we support. Most of
this patch is working around various warnings emitted by GCC in our code
base, which are now being shown when we compile the tests.
After this patch, the whole test suite should be warning free on all
compilers we support and test, except for a few warnings on GCC that
we silence explicitly until we figure out the proper fix for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120684
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
Actually there's one functional change here, which is that users can
no longer depend on <random> to include all of C++20 <concepts>. That
inclusion is so new that we believe nobody should be depending on it
yet, even in the presence of Hyrum's Law. We keep the includes of <vector>,
<algorithm>, etc., so as not to break pre-C++20 Hyrum's Law users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114281
