Fixes#75975.
Remove `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS` for the LLVM 19
release, it was previously marked as deprecated in LLVM 18.
I believe that
`_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_VOID_SPECIALIZATION` was only
used by Google in conjunction with
`_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS`.
Removing both macros together should not cause any issues in practice,
even though we did not announce the removal of
`_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_VOID_SPECIALIZATION` before.
The `parse.pass.cpp` tests doen't need to call
`test_format_context_create` to create a `basic_format_context`, so they
shouldn't include `test_format_context.h`.
The `to_address` mechanism works around the iterator debugging
mechanisms of MSVC STL. Related to
[LWG3989](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3989).
Discovered when implementing `formatter<tuple>` in MSVC STL. With the
inclusion removed, `std/utilities/format/format.tuple/parse.pass.cpp`
when using enhanced MSVC STL (and `/utf-8` option for MSVC).
This fixes MSVC warning C4127: conditional expression is constant.
Testing `TEST_STD_AT_LEAST_20_OR_RUNTIME_EVALUATED` by itself doesn't
emit this warning, but the condition here is more complicated. I'm
expanding the macro and mechanically simplifying the resulting code.
(Yeah, this warning is often annoying, and I introduced
`TEST_STD_AT_LEAST_20_OR_RUNTIME_EVALUATED` to avoid this warning
elsewhere, so it's disappointing that it doesn't make the compiler happy
here. If this change is undesirable, I can replace it with
`ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(cl-style-warnings)`, but ideally I'd like to
avoid having to suppress it.)
---------
Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
An immediate colon signifeis that the range-format-spec contains only
range-underlying-spec.
This patch allows this code to compile and run:
```c++
std::println("{::<<9?}", std::span<const char>{"Hello", sizeof "Hello"});
```
This patch removes assumptions that std::array's iterators are raw
pointers in the source code and in our test suite. While this is true
right now, this doesn't have to be true and ion the future we might want
to enable bounded iterators in std::array, which would require this
change.
This is a pre-requisite for landing #74482
This is the last PR that's needed (for now) to get libc++'s tests
working with MSVC's STL.
The ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS machinery is very useful, but also very
problematic for MSVC, as it doesn't understand most of Clang's compiler
options. We've been dealing with this by simply marking anything that
uses ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS as FAIL or SKIPPED, but that creates
significant gaps in test coverage.
Fortunately, ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS also supports "features", which
can be slightly enhanced to send Clang-compatible and MSVC-compatible
options to the right compilers.
This patch adds the gcc-style-warnings and cl-style-warnings Lit features,
and uses that to pass the appropriate warning flags to tests. It also uses
TEST_MEOW_DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORED for a few local suppressions of MSVC
warnings.
Found while running libc++'s tests with MSVC's STL.
*
`libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.modifying.operations/alg.unique/ranges_unique_copy.pass.cpp`
+ Fix MSVC "warning C4389: '`==`': signed/unsigned mismatch".
+ This was x86-specific for me. The LHS is `int` and the RHS is
`size_t`. We know the `array`'s size, so `static_cast<int>` is certainly
safe, and this matches the following `numberOfProj` comparisons.
*
`libcxx/test/std/containers/sequences/insert_range_sequence_containers.h`
+ Fix MSVC "warning C4267: 'argument': conversion from '`size_t`' to
'`const int`', possible loss of data".
+ `test_case.index` is `size_t`:
b85f1f9b18/libcxx/test/std/containers/insert_range_helpers.h (L65-L68)
+ But the container's `difference_type` is `int`:
b85f1f9b18/libcxx/test/support/test_allocator.h (L65-L76)
+ I introduced an alias `D` to make the long line more readable.
*
`libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.map/eq.different_hash.pass.cpp`
*
`libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.multimap/eq.different_hash.pass.cpp`
*
`libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.multiset/eq.different_hash.pass.cpp`
*
`libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.set/eq.different_hash.pass.cpp`
+ Fix MSVC "warning C6297: Arithmetic overflow. Results might not be an
expected value."
+ This warning is almost annoying enough to outright disable, but we use
similar `static_cast`s to deal with sign/truncation warnings elsewhere,
because there's some value in ensuring that product code is clean with
respect to these warnings. If there were many more occurrences, then
disabling the warning would be appropriate.
+ Cleanup: Change 2 inconsistently unqualified occurrences of `size_t`
to `std::size_t`.
*
`libcxx/test/std/containers/views/mdspan/layout_stride/index_operator.pass.cpp`
+ Fix MSVC "warning C4244: 'initializing': conversion from '`__int64`'
to '`size_t`', possible loss of data".
+ This was x86-specific for me. The `args` are indeed `int64_t`, and
we're storing the result in `size_t`, so we should cast.
* `libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.utility/range.utility.conv/container.h`
+ Fix MSVC "warning C4244: 'initializing': conversion from '`ptrdiff_t`'
to '`int`', possible loss of data".
+ Fix MSVC "warning C4267: 'initializing': conversion from '`size_t`' to
'`int`', possible loss of data".
+ We're initializing `int size_`, so we should explicitly cast from
pointer subtraction and `std::ranges::size`.
*
`libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.create/allocate_shared_for_overwrite.pass.cpp`
*
`libcxx/test/std/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/util.smartptr.shared.create/make_shared_for_overwrite.pass.cpp`
*
`libcxx/test/std/utilities/smartptr/unique.ptr/unique.ptr.create/make_unique_for_overwrite.default_init.pass.cpp`
+ Fix MSVC "warning C4309: 'initializing': truncation of constant
value".
+ MSVC emits this warning because `0xDE` is outside the range of `char`
(signed by default in our implementation).
* `libcxx/test/support/concat_macros.h`
+ Fix MSVC "warning C4244: 'argument': conversion from '`char16_t`' to
'`const char`', possible loss of data".
+ Fix MSVC "warning C4244: 'argument': conversion from '`unsigned int`'
to '`const char`', possible loss of data".
+ This code was very recently introduced by @mordante in #73395.
Found while running libc++'s test suite with MSVC's STL.
* I've filed [LWG-4021](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue4021)
"`mdspan::is_always_meow()` should be `noexcept`" and implemented this
in libc++'s product and test code.
* Use `LIBCPP_STATIC_ASSERT` to avoid issues with `noexcept`
strengthening in MSVC's STL.
+ As permitted by the Standard, MSVC's STL conditionally strengthens
`mdspan` construction/`is_meow`/`stride` and `elements_view` iterator
`base() &&`, and always strengthens `basic_stringbuf` `swap`.
+ In `mdspan/properties.pass.cpp`, this also upgrades runtime `assert`s
to `static_assert`s.
* Improvement: Upgrade `assert` to `static_assert` when inspecting the
`noexcept`ness of `std::ranges::iter_move`. (These `!noexcept` tests
weren't causing issues for MSVC's STL, so I didn't change them to be
libc++-specific.)
This is a pure syntax cleanup, I don't need it for running libc++'s
tests with MSVC's STL.
This is possible because std::layout_meow and layout_wrapping_integral<1729>
aren't dependent types. We only need typename and template when reaching
into a dependent type, like `typename OtherLayout::template mapping<E2>` or
`typename layout_wrapping_integral<Wraps>::template mapping<Extents>`.
Found while running libc++'s tests with MSVC's STL, where `std::array`
iterators are never pointers.
Most of these changes are reasonably self-explanatory (the `std::array`s
are right there, and the sometimes-slightly-wrapped raw pointer types
are a short distance away). A couple of changes are less obvious:
In `libcxx/test/std/containers/from_range_helpers.h`, `wrap_input()` is
called with `Iter` types that are constructible from raw pointers. It's
also sometimes called with an `array` as the `input`, so the first
overload was implicitly assuming that `array` iterators are pointers. We
can fix this assumption by providing a dedicated overload for `array`,
just like the one for `vector` immediately below. Finally,
`from_range_helpers.h` should explicitly include both `<array>` and
`<vector>`, even though they were apparently being dragged in already.
In `libcxx/test/std/containers/views/views.span/span.cons/iterator_sentinel.pass.cpp`,
fix `throw_operator_minus`. The error was pretty complicated, caused by
the concepts machinery noticing that `value_type` and `element_type`
were inconsistent. In the template instantiation context, you can see
the critical detail that `throw_operator_minus<std::_Array_iterator>` is
being formed.
Fortunately, the fix is extremely simple. To produce `element_type`
(which retains any cv-qualification, unlike `value_type`), we shouldn't
attempt to `remove_pointer` with the iterator type `It`. Instead, we've
already obtained the `reference` type, so we can `remove_reference_t`.
(This is modern code, where we have access to the alias templates, so I
saw no reason to use the older verbose form.)
Found while running libc++'s tests with MSVC's STL. This fixes 3 kinds of warnings:
- Add void-casts to fix `-Wunused-variable` warnings.
- Avoid sign/truncation warnings in `ConvertibleToIntegral.h`.
- Add `TEST_STD_AT_LEAST_23_OR_RUNTIME_EVALUATED` to avoid mixing preprocessor
and runtime tests.
- Cleanup: Add `TEST_STD_AT_LEAST_20_OR_RUNTIME_EVALUATED` for
consistency.
While trying to work around MSAN/TSAN build timeouts, we enabled
optimizations on some tests. This caused GCC to start complaining that
some values may be uninitialized. I believe GCC is wrong, but more
investigation is needed.
The values are initialized when the variable `__g` is either < 0 or >=
0. Which only leaves out NaN I believe, which is likely well into UB
land anyway.
However, more investigation needed.
This attempts to fix flakes on the bots where the modified test times
out while running under sanitizers.
Turning on the optimizer for just this test appears to mostly fix the
issue.
Found while running libc++'s test suite with MSVC's STL.
[mdspan.extents.overview]/1.1 mandates that IndexType is a signed or
unsigned integer type, which excludes char.
MSVC's STL enforces the Mandates here, so this PR changes the relevant
occurrences of `char to `signed char`. To make this work, we also need
to add an `operator signed char()` to the test helper type `IntType` so
it remains unambiguously convertible, and then we can remove `operator
char()`.
libc++ should also enforce the Mandates, but this PR doesn't attempt to make
such a change.
Found while running libc++'s test suite with MSVC's STL.
MSVC's STL rejects `allocator<const T>`. This may or may not be
justified by the current Standardese (it was bogus in the C++03 era),
but it's how we reject usage like `vector<const T>`.
A bunch of `mdspan` tests are failing for us because some centralized
machinery is using `allocator<const T>`. Testing that `mdspan` and its
associated types work properly with `const T` is good and necessary, but
directly allocating `const T` is what's a problem for MSVC's STL. I'd
like to ask for a very targeted change here that preserves all of the
test coverage but changes how `ElementPool` interacts with `allocator`.
This intentionally leaves `ElementPool::get_ptr()` returning `T*`
(pointer-to-possibly-const), so there's no externally visible
difference.
Found while running libc++'s test suite with MSVC's STL, where we use
both Clang and MSVC's compiler.
libc++'s test suite has started using some C++23 Core Language features
that MSVC hasn't implemented yet. When avoiding these features costs
just a tiny bit of syntax, I would like to ask libc++ to consider making
that change in the interest of practical portability, at least until
MSVC catches up. If there's no desire to do so, then I could skip the
affected tests, but that would make me a slightly sad kitty.
Found while running libc++'s test suite against MSVC's STL.
`libcxx/test/std` should be portable, so these lines checking
`std::__mdspan_detail` machinery should be using `LIBCPP_STATIC_ASSERT`.
I checked for other occurrences and these appear to be the only ones
which have appeared since our last libc++ test suite update.
I've structured this into a series of commits for even easier reviewing,
if that helps. I could easily split this up into separate PRs if
desired, but as this is low-risk with simple edits, I thought one PR
would be easiest.
* Drop unnecessary semicolons after function definitions.
* Cleanup comment typos.
* Cleanup `static_assert` typos.
* Cleanup test code typos.
+ There should be no functional changes, assuming I've changed all
occurrences.
* ~~Fix massive test code typos.~~
+ This was a real problem, but needed more surgery. I reverted those
changes here, and @philnik777 is fixing this properly with #73444.
* clang-formatting as requested by the CI.
Found while running libc++'s test suite with MSVC's STL.
This is structured into a series of commits for easier reviewing; I
could also split this into smaller PRs if desired.
* Add void-casts for `invoke_r` calls to fix MSVC STL `[[nodiscard]]`
warnings.
+ Our rationale is that if someone is calling `invoke_r<NonVoidType>`,
it sure looks like they care about the return value.
* Add `[[maybe_unused]]` to silence `-Wunused-parameter` warnings.
+ This happens because the parameters are used within `LIBCPP_ASSERT`,
which vanishes for MSVC's STL. This also motivates the following
changes.
* Add `[[maybe_unused]]` to fix `-Wunused-variable` warnings.
* Always void-cast `debug_comparisons` to fix `-Wunused-variable`
warnings.
+ As this was already unused with a void-cast in one
`_LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE` branch, I'm simply lifting it next to the
variable definition.
* Add `[[maybe_unused]]` to fix `-Wunused-local-typedef` warnings.
This implements layout_stride for C++23 and with that completes the
implementation of the C++23 mdspan header. The feature test macro is
added, and the status pages updated.
Co-authored-by: Damien L-G <dalg24@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157171
extents CTAD was requiring default constructibility of the extent
arguments due to the way we implemented a pack expansion. This
requirement is not in the standard.
Reported in issue #68671https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/68671 by @hewillk.
Fixes#68671
Since LLVM 17 has been branched and is on the verge of being released,
we can drop the CI job that tests against Clang 15. I think the number
of cherry-picks to `release/17.x` will be a lot smaller now, so keeping
a Clang 15 job around for that purpose seems unnecessary.
As a fly-by, this patch also removes some Clang 15 workarounds and test
suite annotations as we usually do. It also removes some slightly older
gcc test suite annotations that were missed.
This patch is a melting pot of changes picked up from
https://llvm.org/D61878. It adds a few tests checking corner cases of
unordered containers comparison and adds benchmarks for a few
unordered_set operations.
Was part of D118114. Unify test cases for `std::map::count` method and
add test case for the comparator that marked `final`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118232
Fixes uglification in mdspan deduction guides, which CI
did not test for until recently. The CI modification
and mdspan testing overlapped, so mdspan landed with green
CI, and the CI modification landed too.
Make most assertions in mdspan and its helper classes
trigger during a hardened build in order to catch
out of bounds access errors.
Also moves all mdspan assertions tests from libcxx/test/std
to libcxx/test/libcxx.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/156181
This implements P0009 std::mdspan ((https://wg21.link/p0009)),
a multidimensional span with customization points for
layouts and data access.
Co-authored-by: Damien L-G <dalg24@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/154367
The hardened mode is intended to only include security-critical,
relatively low-overhead checks that are intended to be usable in
production. By default, assertions are excluded from this mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155866
Improves both the compile-time and run-time errors.
At compile-time it does a bit more work to get more specific errors.
This could be done at run-time too, but that has a performance penalty.
Since it's expected most use-cases use format* instead of vformat* the
compile-time errors are more common.
For example when using
std::format_to("{:-c}", 42);
Before compile output would contain
std::__throw_format_error("The format-spec should consume the input or end with a '}'");
Now it contains
std::__throw_format_error("The format specifier does not allow the sign option");
Given a better indication the sign option is not allowed. Note the
output is still not user-friendly; C++ doesn't have good facilities to
generate nice messages from the library.
In general all messages have been reviewed and improved, using a more
consistent style and using less terms used in the standard. For example
format-spec -> format specifier
arg-id -> argument index
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152624
After parsing a std-format-spec it's validated, depending on the type used some
format options are not allowed. This improves the error messages in the
exceptions thrown upon failure.
Depends on D155364
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155366
