19 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
A. Jiang
63ae5099b7
[libc++][test] Don't include test_format_context.h in parse.pass.cpp (#83734)
The `parse.pass.cpp` tests doen't need to call
`test_format_context_create` to create a `basic_format_context`, so they
shouldn't include `test_format_context.h`.

The `to_address` mechanism works around the iterator debugging
mechanisms of MSVC STL. Related to
[LWG3989](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3989).

Discovered when implementing `formatter<tuple>` in MSVC STL. With the
inclusion removed, `std/utilities/format/format.tuple/parse.pass.cpp`
when using enhanced MSVC STL (and `/utf-8` option for MSVC).
2024-03-11 10:55:16 -04:00
Po-yao Chang
b29301cd40
[libc++][format] Handle range-underlying-spec (#81914)
An immediate colon signifeis that the range-format-spec contains only
range-underlying-spec.

This patch allows this code to compile and run:
```c++
std::println("{::<<9?}", std::span<const char>{"Hello", sizeof "Hello"});
```
2024-03-04 08:05:01 +08:00
Po-yao Chang
08fe7df600
[libc++][format] Don't treat a closing '}' as part of format-spec (#81305)
This allows:
```
std::println("{}>42", std:🧵:id{});
std::println("{}>42", std::span<int>{});
std::println("{}>42", std::pair{42, "Hello"sv});
std::println("{:}>42", std:🧵:id{});
std::println("{:}>42", std::span<int>{});
std::println("{:}>42", std::pair{42, "Hello"sv});
```
to compile and run.
2024-02-16 02:41:07 +08:00
Mark de Wever
402eb2ef09 [libc++][format] Improves diagnostics.
Improves both the compile-time and run-time errors.
At compile-time it does a bit more work to get more specific errors.
This could be done at run-time too, but that has a performance penalty.
Since it's expected most use-cases use format* instead of vformat* the
compile-time errors are more common.

For example when using

  std::format_to("{:-c}", 42);

Before compile output would contain

  std::__throw_format_error("The format-spec should consume the input or end with a '}'");

Now it contains

  std::__throw_format_error("The format specifier does not allow the sign option");

Given a better indication the sign option is not allowed. Note the
output is still not user-friendly; C++ doesn't have good facilities to
generate nice messages from the library.

In general all messages have been reviewed and improved, using a more
consistent style and using less terms used in the standard. For example

  format-spec -> format specifier
  arg-id -> argument index

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152624
2023-07-18 21:11:12 +02:00
Mark de Wever
a0ffeccc70 [libc++][format] Improves run-time diagnostics.
After parsing a std-format-spec it's validated, depending on the type used some
format options are not allowed. This improves the error messages in the
exceptions thrown upon failure.

Depends on D155364

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155366
2023-07-18 21:01:52 +02:00
Mark de Wever
a9e5773f52 [libc++][format] Implements formatting pointer.
The feature is applied as DR instead of a normal paper. MSVC STL and
libstdc++ will do the same.

Implements
- P2510R3 Formatting pointers

Depends on D153192

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153195
2023-07-05 18:23:31 +02:00
Louis Dionne
520c7fbbd0 [libc++] Mark slow tests as unsupported on GCC
Some tests in our test suite are unbelievably slow on GCC due to the
use of the always_inline attribute. See [1] for more details.

This patch introduces the GCC-ALWAYS_INLINE-FIXME lit feature to
disable tests that are plagued by that issue. At the same time, it
moves several existing tests from ad-hoc `UNSUPPORTED: gcc-12` markup
to the new GCC-ALWAYS_INLINE-FIXME feature, and marks the slowest tests
reported by the CI as `UNSUPPORTED: GCC-ALWAYS_INLINE-FIXME`.

[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-stop-supporting-extern-instantiations-with-gcc/71277/1

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152736
2023-06-13 10:20:30 -07:00
Mark de Wever
dff62f5251 [libc++][format] Removes the experimental status.
The code has been quite ready for a while now and there are no more ABI
breaking papers. So this is a good time to mark the feature as stable.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150802
2023-05-24 17:16:22 +02:00
Mark de Wever
62858636f5 [NFC][libc++][format] Tests formatter requirements.
Like done D149543 this validates the other formatter specializations.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150041
2023-05-13 11:21:15 +02:00
Mark de Wever
3acf9b9c2b [libc++][format] Improves tests.
This is based on the last open review comment in D144331 and is applied
to all occurrences.

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147885
2023-04-11 18:44:03 +02:00
Louis Dionne
f0fc8c4878 [libc++] Use named Lit features to flag back-deployment XFAILs
Instead of writing something like `XFAIL: use_system_cxx_lib && target=...`
to XFAIL back-deployment tests, introduce named Lit features like
`availability-shared_mutex-missing` to represent those. This makes the
XFAIL annotations leaner, and solves the problem of XFAIL comments
potentially getting out of sync. This would also make it easier for
another vendor to add their own annotations to the test suite by simply
changing how the feature is defined for their OS releases, instead
of having to modify hundreds of tests to add repetitive annotations.

This doesn't touch *all* annotations -- only annotations that were widely
duplicated are given named features (e.g. when filesystem or shared_mutex
were introduced). I still think it probably doesn't make sense to have a
named feature for every single fix we make to the dylib.

This is in essence a revert of 2659663, but since then the test suite
has changed significantly. Back when I did 2659663, the configuration
files we have for the test suite right now were being bootstrapped and
it wasn't clear how to provide these features for back-deployment in
that context. Since then, we have a streamlined way of defining these
features in `features.py` and that doesn't impact the ability for a
configuration file to stay minimal.

The original motivation for this change was that I am about to propose
a change that would touch essentially all XFAIL annotations for back-deployment
in the test suite, and this greatly reduces the number of lines changed
by that upcoming change, in addition to making the test suite generally
better.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146359
2023-03-27 12:44:26 -04:00
Louis Dionne
3d334df587 [libc++] Remove availability markup for std::format
std::format is currently experimental, so there is technically no
deployment target requirement for it (since the only symbols required
for it are in `libc++experimental.a`).

However, some parts of std::format depend indirectly on the floating
point std::to_chars implementation, which does have deployment target
requirements.

This patch removes all the availability format for std::format and
updates the XFAILs in the tests to properly explain why they fail
on old deployment targets, when they do. It also changes a couple
of tests to avoid depending on floating-point std::to_chars when
it isn't fundamental to the test.

Finally, some tests are marked as XFAIL but I added a comment saying

   TODO FMT This test should not require std::to_chars(floating-point)

These tests do not fundamentally depend on floating-point std::to_chars,
however they end up failing because calling std::format even without a
floating-point argument to format will end up requiring floating-point
std::to_chars. I believe this is an implementation artifact that could
be avoided in all cases where we know the format string at compile-time.
In the tests, I added the TODO comment only to the places where we could
do better and actually avoid relying on floating-point std::to_chars
because we know the format string at compile-time.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134598
2023-03-22 16:32:26 -04:00
Mark de Wever
24c251d94d [libc++][format] Addresses LWG3881.
LWG3881 Incorrect formatting of container adapters backed by std::string

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144277
2023-03-07 19:10:26 +01:00
Mark de Wever
7e4639d28f [libc++][format] Fixes formatting vector<bool>
Formatting a const qualified vector<bool> fails to work on libc++. This
is due to our non-conforming type for vector<bool>::const_reference. The
type is a __bit_const_reference<vector> instead of a bool. (This is
fixed in ABI v2.)

This fixes this formatter and enables the test written for it.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144279
2023-03-04 13:59:49 +01:00
Mark de Wever
2d85683f98 [lib++][format] Uses the new exception test macros.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143393
2023-02-17 18:53:14 +01:00
Mark de Wever
3476b56f0c [libc++][test] Adds more generic test macros.
These macros are intended to replace the macros in rapid-cxx-test.h.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142808
2023-02-17 17:01:58 +01:00
Mark de Wever
d819703410 [libc++][test] Disable parts requiring locales.
This part should be guarded, but there are no proper guards yet.
Therefore disable the offending part. This was reported post commit in
D140653.
2023-01-22 16:51:13 +01:00
Mark de Wever
af5fc4b4d8 [libc++][format] range-default-formatter for map
Implements the range-default-formatter specialization range_format::map.

Implements parts of
- P2286R8 Formatting Ranges
- P2585R0 Improving default container formatting

Depends on D140653

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140801
2023-01-19 20:55:52 +01:00
Mark de Wever
04d4f4b3d4 [libc++][format] Adds container adaptor formatters.
Implements parts of
- P2286R8 Formatting Ranges

Depends on D140653

Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141290
2023-01-19 17:50:16 +01:00