Mark tests as necessary to accommodate Android L (5.0 / API 21) and up.
Add three Android lit features:
- android
- android-device-api=(21,22,23,...)
- LIBCXX-ANDROID-FIXME (for failures that need follow-up work)
Enable an AIX workaround in filesystem_test_helper.h for the broken
chmod on older Android devices.
Mark failing test with XFAIL or UNSUPPORTED:
- Mark modules tests as UNSUPPORTED, matching other configurations.
- Mark a gdb test as UNSUPPORTED.
- XFAIL tests for old devices that lack an API (fmemopen).
- XFAIL various FS tests (because SELinux blocks FIFO and hard linking,
because fchmodat is broken on old devices).
- XFAIL various locale tests (because Bionic has limited locale
support). (Also XFAIL an re.traits test.)
- XFAIL some print.fun tests because the error exception has no system
error string.
- Mark std::{cin,wcin} tests UNSUPPORTED because they hang with
adb_run.py on old devices.
- Mark a few tests UNSUPPORTED because they allocate too much memory.
- notify_one.pass.cpp is flaky on Android.
- XFAIL libc++abi demangler test because of Android's special long
double on x86[-64].
N.B. The `__ANDROID_API__` macro specifies a minimum required API level
at build-time, whereas the android-device-api lit feature is the
detected API level of the device at run-time. The android-device-api
value will be >= `__ANDROID_API__`.
This commit was split out from https://reviews.llvm.org/D139147.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/69270
Specifically, the test std/input.output/string.streams/stringstream/stringstream.members/gcount.pass.cpp
allocates a std::string with INT_MAX-1 elements, and then writes this to
a std::stringstream. On Linux, running this test consumes around 5.0 GB
of memory; on Windows, it ends up using up to 6.8 GB of memory.
This limits whether such tests can run on e.g. GitHub Actions runners,
where the free runners are limited to 8 GB of memory.
This is somewhat similar to, but still notably different, from the
existing test parameter long_tests.
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
