I've structured this into a series of commits for even easier reviewing,
if that helps. I could easily split this up into separate PRs if
desired, but as this is low-risk with simple edits, I thought one PR
would be easiest.
* Drop unnecessary semicolons after function definitions.
* Cleanup comment typos.
* Cleanup `static_assert` typos.
* Cleanup test code typos.
+ There should be no functional changes, assuming I've changed all
occurrences.
* ~~Fix massive test code typos.~~
+ This was a real problem, but needed more surgery. I reverted those
changes here, and @philnik777 is fixing this properly with #73444.
* clang-formatting as requested by the CI.
Found while running libc++'s test suite with MSVC's STL.
This is structured into a series of commits for easier reviewing; I
could also split this into smaller PRs if desired.
* Add void-casts for `invoke_r` calls to fix MSVC STL `[[nodiscard]]`
warnings.
+ Our rationale is that if someone is calling `invoke_r<NonVoidType>`,
it sure looks like they care about the return value.
* Add `[[maybe_unused]]` to silence `-Wunused-parameter` warnings.
+ This happens because the parameters are used within `LIBCPP_ASSERT`,
which vanishes for MSVC's STL. This also motivates the following
changes.
* Add `[[maybe_unused]]` to fix `-Wunused-variable` warnings.
* Always void-cast `debug_comparisons` to fix `-Wunused-variable`
warnings.
+ As this was already unused with a void-cast in one
`_LIBCPP_HARDENING_MODE` branch, I'm simply lifting it next to the
variable definition.
* Add `[[maybe_unused]]` to fix `-Wunused-local-typedef` warnings.
This patch removes the non compliant constructor of std::future_error
and adds the standards compliant constructor in C++17 instead.
Note that we can't support the constructor as an extension in all
standard modes because it uses delegating constructors, which require
C++11. We could in theory support the constructor as an extension in
C++11 and C++14 only, however I believe it is acceptable not to do that
since I expect the breakage from this patch will be minimal.
If it turns out that more code than we expect is broken by this, we can
reconsider that decision.
This was found during D99515.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99567
Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
Since LLVM 17 has been branched and is on the verge of being released,
we can drop the CI job that tests against Clang 15. I think the number
of cherry-picks to `release/17.x` will be a lot smaller now, so keeping
a Clang 15 job around for that purpose seems unnecessary.
As a fly-by, this patch also removes some Clang 15 workarounds and test
suite annotations as we usually do. It also removes some slightly older
gcc test suite annotations that were missed.
AppleClang 15 was released on September 18th and is now stable. Per our
policy, we're bumping the supported AppleClang compiler to the latest
release. This allows cleaning up the test suite, but most importantly
unblocking various other patches that are blocked on bumping the
compiler requirements.
When a handle to an error_category singleton object is used during the
termination phase of a program, the destruction of the error_category
object may have occurred prior to execution of the current destructor
or function registered with atexit, because the singleton object may
have been constructed after the corresponding initialization or call
to atexit. For example, the updated tests from this patch will fail if
using a libc++ built using a compiler that updates the vtable of the
object on destruction.
This patch attempts to avoid the issue by causing the destructor to not
be called in the style of ResourceInitHelper in src/experimental/memory_resource.cpp.
This approach might not work if object lifetime is strictly enforced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65667
Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
I made sure they all had some expected-error output in them. Many of
these tests would be better implemented as a positive test using SFINAE,
but this is beyond the scope of this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153980
The use_system_cxx_lib Lit feature was only used for back-deployment
testing. However, one immense hole in that setup was that we didn't
have a proper way to test Apple's own libc++ outside of back-deployment,
which was embodied by the fact that we needed to define _LIBCPP_DISABLE_AVAILABILITY
when testing (see change in libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/params.py).
This led to the apple-system testing configuration not checking for
availability markup, which is obviously quite bad since the library
we ship actually has availability markup.
Using stdlib=<VENDOR>-libc++ instead to encode back-deployment restrictions
on tests is simpler and it makes it possible to naturally support tests
such as availability markup checking even in the tip-of-trunk Apple-libc++
configuration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146366
This also updates the moved code to the current style. (i.e. `_VSTD` -> `std`, `_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY` -> `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI`, clang-format).
Reviewed By: Mordante, #libc, EricWF
Spies: arichardson, libcxx-commits, mikhail.ramalho
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146228
We pretty consistently don't define those cause they are not needed,
and it removes the potential pitfall to think that these tests are
being run. This doesn't touch .compile.fail.cpp tests since those
should be replaced by .verify.cpp tests anyway, and there would be
a lot to fix up.
As a fly-by, I also fixed a bit of formatting, removed a few unused
includes and made some very minor, clearly NFC refactorings such as
in allocator.traits/allocator.traits.members/allocate.verify.cpp where
the old test basically made no sense the way it was written.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146236
Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name libcpp-has-no-xxx
doesn't make sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126482
All supported compilers have implemented this feature.
Therefore use the language version instead of the feature macro.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119865
When P0883R2 was initially implemented in D103769 #pragma clang deprecated didn't exist yet.
We also forgot to cleanup usages in libc++ itself.
This takes care of both.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115995
This patch removes the ability to build the runtimes in the 32 bit
multilib configuration, i.e. using -m32. Instead of doing this, one
should cross-compile the runtimes for the appropriate target triple,
like we do for all other triples.
As it stands, -m32 has several issues, which all seem to be related to
the fact that it's not well supported by the operating systems that
libc++ support. The simplest path towards fixing this is to remove
support for the configuration, which is also the best course of action
if there is little interest for keeping that configuration. If there
is a desire to keep this configuration around, we'll need to do some
work to figure out the underlying issues and fix them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114473
Make test_allocator etc. constexpr-friendly so they can be used to test constexpr string and possibly constexpr vector
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110994
After recent changes to the Docker image, all hell broke loose and the
CI started failing. This patch marks a few tests as unsupported until
we can figure out what the issues are and fix them.
In the future, it would be ideal if the nodes could pick up the Dockerfile
present in the revision being tested, which would allow us to test changes
to the Dockerfile in the CI, like we do for all other code changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112737
Even if these comments have a benefit in .h files (for editors that
care about language but can't be configured to treat .h as C++ code),
they certainly have no benefit for files with the .cpp extension.
Discussed in D110794.
The aim of this patch is to remove the assumption that the character 'a' is always 97. In turn, this patch explicitly uses the character values to account for the EBCDIC 'a' that is not 97.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108321
Now that Lit supports regular expressions inside XFAIL & friends, it is
much easier to write Lit annotations based on the triple.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104747
This fixes a long standing issue where the triple is not always set
consistently in all configurations. This change also moves the
back-deployment Lit features to using the proper target triple
instead of using something ad-hoc.
This will be necessary for using from scratch Lit configuration files
in both normal testing and back-deployment testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102012
We create threads using std::thread in various places in the test suite.
However, the usual std::thread constructor may not work on all platforms,
e.g. on platforms where passing a stack size is required to create a thread.
This commit introduces a simple indirection that makes it easier to tweak
how threads are created inside the test suite on various platforms. Note
that tests that are purposefully calling std::thread's constructor directly
(e.g. because that is what they're testing) were not modified.
We don't support GCC in C++03 mode, and Clang provides rvalue references
even in C++03 mode. So there's effectively no supported compiler that
doesn't support rvalue references.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84943
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
Like other uses of ALLOW_RETRIES, this test tried to verify that an API
returned "quickly" but quick is not safe to define given slow and/or
busy machines.
Instead, we now verify that these "wait" APIs actually wait, which the
old test did not.
These two tests do not use the "thread sleeps X milliseconds" pattern
that other libcxx tests use, so all we can do in order to remove
ALLOW_RETRIES workaround is remove the assumption that measuring the
"quick" return of `wait()` is possible (it is not). Let the test harness
verify overall that `wait()` does not hang.
As a bonus, have the spin-waiting threads `yield()`, which is what well
behaved code should do.
This test tried to verify that "wait()" returned quickly but "quick" is
impossible to define given a busy and/or slow system.
Instead, I've refactored the test to verify that `wait()` actually
waits which the old test did not verify.
Tests that require support for Clang-verify are already marked as such
explicitly by their extension, which is .verify.cpp. Requiring the use
of an explicit Lit feature is, after thought, not really helpful.
This is a change in design: we have been bitten in the past by tests not
being enabled when we thought they were. However, the issue was mostly
with file extensions being ignored. The fix for that is not to blindly
require explicit features all the time, but instead to report all files
that are in the suite but that don't match any known test format. This
can be implemented in a follow-up patch.
Instead of having different names for the same Lit feature accross code
bases, use the same name everywhere. This NFC commit is in preparation
for a refactor where all three projects will be using the same Lit
feature detection logic, and hence it won't be convenient to use
different names for the feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78370
The libc++ test suite has a lot of old Lit features used to XFAIL tests
and mark them as UNSUPPORTED. Many of them are to workaround problems on
old compilers or old platforms. As time goes by, it is good to go and
clean those up to simplify the configuration of the test suite, and also
to reflect the testing reality. It's not useful to have markup that gives
the impression that e.g. clang-3.3 is supported, when we don't really
test on it anymore (and hence several new tests probably don't have the
necessary markup on them).
Forcing -Werror and other warnings means that the test suite isn't
actually testing what most people are seeing in their code -- it seems
better and less arbitrary to compile these tests as close as possible
to the compiler default instead.
Removing -Werror also means that we get to differentiate between
diagnostics that are errors and those that are warnings, which makes
the test suite more precise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76311
Some tests do not fail at all when -verify is not supported, unless some
arbitrary warning flag is added to make them fail. We currently used
-Werror=unused-result to make them fail, but doing so makes the test
suite a lot more inscrutable. It seems better to just disable those
tests when -verify is not supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76256
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
The test was previously marked as unsupported on all Apple platforms, when
we really just want to mark it as unsupported for previously shipped dylibs
on macosx.
llvm-svn: 347920
PR38682 added a test to check for a race condition in std::future.
Part of the fix is part of the dylib, but there is no released version
of mac OS X that ships a dylib containing the fix. Hence, this test can
(and sometimes does) when testing on OS X. This commit marks the test
as unsupported to avoid spurious failures.
llvm-svn: 344053
