Breaks build of LLVMgold here:
```
/repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1108:19: error: no matching function for call to 'localCache'
Cache = check(localCache("ThinLTO", "Thin", options::cache_dir, AddBuffer));
^~~~~~~~~~
/repositories/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Caching.h:72:21: note: candidate function not viable: no known conversion from '(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1102:20)' to 'llvm::AddBufferFn' (aka 'function<void (unsigned int, const llvm::Twine &, std::unique_ptr<MemoryBuffer>)>') for 4th argument
Expected<FileCache> localCache(
^
/repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1110:18: error: no viable conversion from '(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20)' to 'llvm::AddStreamFn' (aka 'function<Expected<std::unique_ptr<CachedFileStream>> (unsigned int, const llvm::Twine &)>')
check(Lto->run(AddStream, Cache));
^~~~~~~~~
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12/../../../../include/c++/12/bits/std_function.h:375:7: note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from '(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20)' to 'std::nullptr_t' for 1st argument
function(nullptr_t) noexcept
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12/../../../../include/c++/12/bits/std_function.h:386:7: note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from '(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20)' to 'const std::function<llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<llvm::CachedFileStream>> (unsigned int, const llvm::Twine &)> &' for 1st argument
function(const function& __x)
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12/../../../../include/c++/12/bits/std_function.h:404:7: note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from '(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20)' to 'std::function<llvm::Expected<std::unique_ptr<llvm::CachedFileStream>> (unsigned int, const llvm::Twine &)> &&' for 1st argument
function(function&& __x) noexcept
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/12/../../../../include/c++/12/bits/std_function.h:435:2: note: candidate template ignored: requirement '_Callable<(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20) &, (lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20), std::__invoke_result<(lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20) &, unsigned int, const llvm::Twine &>>::value' was not satisfied [with _Functor = (lambda at /repositories/llvm-project/llvm/tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp:1094:20) &]
function(_Functor&& __f)
^
/repositories/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/LTO/LTO.h:278:25: note: passing argument to parameter 'AddStream' here
Error run(AddStreamFn AddStream, FileCache Cache = nullptr);
^
```
This reverts commit 387620aa8cea33174b6c1fb80c1af713fee732ac.
Currently the lto native object files have names like main.exe.lto.1.obj. In
PDB, those names are used as names for each compiland. Microsoft’s tool
SizeBench uses those names to present to users the size of each object files.
So, names like main.exe.lto.1.obj is not user friendly.
This patch makes the lto native object file names more readable by using
the bitcode file names as part of the file names. For example, if the input
bitcode file has path like "path/to/foo.obj", its corresponding lto native
object file path would be "path/to/main.exe.lto.foo.obj". Since the lto native
object file name only bothers PDB, this patch only changes the lld-linker's
behavior.
Reviewed By: tejohnson, MaskRay, #lld-macho
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137217
Use the unique filenames that are used when /lldsavetemps is passed.
After this change, module names for LTO blobs in PDBs will be unique.
Visual Studio and probably other debuggers expect module names to be
unique.
Revert some changes from 1e0b158db (2017) that are no longer necessary
after removing MSVC LTO support.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78221
Before this patch, it wasn't possible to extend the ThinLTO threads to all SMT/CMT threads in the system. Only one thread per core was allowed, instructed by usage of llvm::heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() in the ThinLTO code. Any number passed to the LLD flag /opt:lldltojobs=..., or any other ThinLTO-specific flag, was previously interpreted in the context of llvm::heavyweight_hardware_concurrency(), which means SMT disabled.
One can now say in LLD:
/opt:lldltojobs=0 -- Use one std::thread / hardware core in the system (no SMT). Default value if flag not specified.
/opt:lldltojobs=N -- Limit usage to N threads, regardless of usage of heavyweight_hardware_concurrency().
/opt:lldltojobs=all -- Use all hardware threads in the system. Equivalent to /opt:lldltojobs=$(nproc) on Linux and /opt:lldltojobs=%NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS% on Windows. When an affinity mask is set for the process, threads will be created only for the cores selected by the mask.
When N > number-of-hardware-threads-in-the-system, the threads in the thread pool will be dispatched equally on all CPU sockets (tested only on Windows).
When N <= number-of-hardware-threads-on-a-CPU-socket, the threads will remain on the CPU socket where the process started (only on Windows).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75153
Summary:
1. Use stream 0 only for combined module. Previously if combined module was not
processes ThinLTO used the stream for own output. However small changes in input,
could trigger combined module and shuffle outputs making life of llvm::LTO harder.
2. Always process combined module and write output to stream 0. Processing empty
combined module is cheap and allows llvm::LTO users to avoid implementing processing
which is already done in llvm::LTO.
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41267
llvm-svn: 320905
Noticed while testing for an out of tree target. There are probably more tests that should be so marked.
I'm not sure who owns these tests so I've added a few names I recognise from the recent history.
With advice from probinson, ruiu, rafael and dramatically improved by davidb. Thank you all!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34685
llvm-svn: 308335
Summary: Creates bitcode files suitable for use with ThinLTO, then checks that the linker can build an executable from them.
Reviewers: ruiu, pcc
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30277
llvm-svn: 296042
