[lldb] Refactor InstrumentationRuntimeAsan and add a new plugin
InstrumentationRuntimeLibsanitizers.
This commit refactors InstrumentationRuntimeASan by pulling out reusable
code into a separate ReportRetriever class. The purpose of the
refactoring is to allow reuse of the ReportRetriever class in another
plugin.
The commit also adds InstrumentationRuntimeASanLibsanitizers, a new runtime
plugin for ASan. The plugin provides the same
functionality as InstrumentationRuntimeASan, but provides a different
set of symbols/library names to search for while activating the plugin.
rdar://112491689
StreamFile subclasses Stream (from lldbUtility) and is backed by a File
(from lldbHost). It does not depend on anything from lldbCore or any of its
sibling libraries, so I think it makes sense for this to live in
lldbHost instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157460
The code was commented out because it would trigger an assert in the
source manager. I can no longer reproduce the assert and none of the
ASan tests are failing with the code re-enabled.
This is a user facing action, it is meant to focus the user's attention on
something other than the 0th frame when you stop somewhere where that's
helpful. For instance, stopping in pthread_kill after an assert will select
the assert frame.
This is not something you want to have happen internally in lldb, both
because internally you really don't want the selected frame changing out
from under you, and because the recognizers can do arbitrary work, and that
can cause deadlocks or other unexpected behavior.
However, it's not something that the current code does
explicitly after a stop has been delivered, it's expected to happen implicitly
as part of stopping. I changing this to call SMRF explicitly after a user
stop, but that got pretty ugly quickly.
So I added a bool to control whether to run this and audited all the current
uses to determine whether we're returning to the user or not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148863
The synchronous callbacks are not intended to start the target running
during the callback, and doing so is flakey. This patch converts them
to being regular async callbacks, and adds some testing for sequential
reports that have caused problems in the field.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134927
After aed965d we no longer demangle full symbol names while indexing the
symbol table which means we have to use the mangled name instead of the
demangled name to find the symbol for __asan::AsanDie().
This fixes the following two tests:
lldb-api :: functionalities/asan/TestMemoryHistory.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/asan/TestReportData.py
This is a step towards making the initialize and terminate calls be
generated by CMake, which in turn is towards making it possible to
disable plugins at configuration time.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74245
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
