34 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jonas Devlieghere
80fcecb13c
[lldb] Replace assertEquals with assertEqual (NFC) (#82073)
assertEquals is a deprecated alias for assertEqual and has been removed
in Python 3.12. This wasn't an issue previously because we used a
vendored version of the unittest module. Now that we use the built-in
version this gets updated together with the Python version used to run
the test suite.
2024-02-16 20:58:50 -08:00
Felipe de Azevedo Piovezan
8b19d13fde [lldb] Make frame var --regex always search globals
Currently frame var --regex sometimes searches globals, sometimes it doesn't.
This happens because `StackFrame::GetVariableList` always returns the biggest
list it has, regardless of whether only globals were requested or not. In other
words, if a previous call to `GetVariableList` requested globals, all subsequent
calls will see them.

The implication here is that users of `StackFrame::GetVariableList` are expected
to filter the results of this function. This is what we do for a vanilla
`frame var` command. But it is not what we do when `--regex` is used. This
commit solves the issue by:

1. Making `--regex` imply `--globals`. This matches the behavior of `frame var
<some_name>`, which will also search the global scope.
2. Making the `--regex` search respect the command object options.

See the added test for an example of the oddities this patch addresses. Without
the patch, the test fails. However it could be made to pass by calling a plain
`frame var` before calling `frame var --regex A::`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155334
2023-07-19 17:11:21 -04:00
Jonas Devlieghere
2238dcc393
[NFC][Py Reformat] Reformat python files in lldb
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).

If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.

RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
2023-05-25 12:54:09 -07:00
Dave Lee
75fdf7fd15 [lldb] Test direct ivar access in objc++ (NFC)
Add an Objective-C++ specific test for direct ivar access. This adds to the existing C++ and ObjC tests, and tests against regression for future refactoring.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146320
2023-03-21 10:14:42 -07:00
Dave Lee
6c599b1e9b [lldb] Let 'v' command directly access ivars of _any_ self/this
The `v` (`frame variable`) command can directly access ivars/fields of `this` or `self`.
Such as `v field`, instead of `v this->field`. This change relaxes the criteria for
finding `this`/`self` variables.

There are cases where a `this`/`self` variable does exist, but up to now the `v` command
has not made use of it. The user would have to explicitly run `v this->field` or
`self->_ivar` to access ivars. This change allows such cases to also work (without
explicitly dereferencing `this`/`self`).

A very common example in Objective-C (and Swift) is weakly capturing `self`:

```
__weak Type *weakSelf = self;
void (^block)(void) = ^{
   Type *self = weakSelf; // Re-establish strong reference.
   // `v _ivar` should work just as well as `v self->_ivar`.
};
```

In this case, `self` exists but `v` would not have used it. With this change, the fact
that a variable named `self` exists is enough for it to be used.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145276
2023-03-08 11:19:43 -08:00
Dave Lee
23ee705ac9 Recommit [lldb] Test 'v' support for direct ivar access (NFC)
Add basic tests for `frame variable`'s ability to direct access fields of `this` and
ivars of `self`.

This splits the tests, preventing ObjC tests from running on Linux.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145348
2023-03-06 11:52:41 -08:00
Dave Lee
3df28efaa0 Revert "[lldb] Test 'v' support for direct ivar access (NFC)"
This reverts commit 03e5c46e15b4a196cdca0c646e61f0c92a6dc7e1.
2023-03-06 11:12:28 -08:00
Dave Lee
03e5c46e15 [lldb] Test 'v' support for direct ivar access (NFC)
Add basic tests for `frame variable`'s ability to direct access fields of `this` and
ivars of `self`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145348
2023-03-06 10:41:51 -08:00
Greg Clayton
ccb47b41e4 Track .dwo/.dwp loading errors and notify user when viewing variables.
When debugging using Fission (-gsplit-dwarf), we can sometimes have issues loading .dwo files if they are missing or if the path was relative and we were unable to locate the file. We can also skip loading due to DWO ID mismatch or if a .dwp file doesn't contain a matching .dwo file. Also .dwo files could be updated due to a recompile and if the user debugs an executable that was linked against the old .dwo file, it could fail to load the information.

This patch adds a m_dwo_error to DWARFUnit that can be get/set and will cause "frame variable" to show errors when there are .dwo/.dwp issues informing the user about the error.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134252
2022-09-22 11:35:20 -07:00
Greg Clayton
4763200ec9 Add the ability to show when variables fails to be available when debug info is valid.
Summary:
Many times when debugging variables might not be available even though a user can successfully set breakpoints and stops somewhere. Letting the user know will help users fix these kinds of issues and have a better debugging experience.

Examples of this include:
- enabling -gline-tables-only and being able to set file and line breakpoints and yet see no variables
- unable to open object file for DWARF in .o file debugging for darwin targets due to modification time mismatch or not being able to locate the N_OSO file.

This patch adds an new API to SBValueList:

  lldb::SBError lldb::SBValueList::GetError();

object so that if you request a stack frame's variables using SBValueList SBFrame::GetVariables(...), you can get an error the describes why the variables were not available.

This patch adds the ability to get an error back when requesting variables from a lldb_private::StackFrame when calling GetVariableList.

It also now shows an error in response to "frame variable" if we have debug info and are unable to get varialbes due to an error as mentioned above:

(lldb) frame variable
error: "a.o" object from the "/tmp/libfoo.a" archive: either the .o file doesn't exist in the archive or the modification time (0x63111541) of the .o file doesn't match

Reviewers: labath JDevlieghere aadsm yinghuitan jdoerfert sscalpone

Subscribers:

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133164
2022-09-12 13:59:05 -07:00
Stella Stamenova
327146639c Revert "Add the ability to show when variables fails to be available when debug info is valid."
This reverts commit 9af089f5179d52c6561ec27532880edcfb6253af.

This broke the windows lldb bot: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/83/builds/23528
2022-09-12 11:31:17 -07:00
Greg Clayton
9af089f517 Add the ability to show when variables fails to be available when debug info is valid.
Many times when debugging variables might not be available even though a user can successfully set breakpoints and stops somewhere. Letting the user know will help users fix these kinds of issues and have a better debugging experience.

Examples of this include:
- enabling -gline-tables-only and being able to set file and line breakpoints and yet see no variables
- unable to open object file for DWARF in .o file debugging for darwin targets due to modification time mismatch or not being able to locate the N_OSO file.

This patch adds an new API to SBValueList:

  lldb::SBError lldb::SBValueList::GetError();

object so that if you request a stack frame's variables using SBValueList SBFrame::GetVariables(...), you can get an error the describes why the variables were not available.

This patch adds the ability to get an error back when requesting variables from a lldb_private::StackFrame when calling GetVariableList.

It also now shows an error in response to "frame variable" if we have debug info and are unable to get varialbes due to an error as mentioned above:

(lldb) frame variable
error: "a.o" object from the "/tmp/libfoo.a" archive: either the .o file doesn't exist in the archive or the modification time (0x63111541) of the .o file doesn't match

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133164
2022-09-09 16:14:46 -07:00
Dave Lee
4cc8f2a017 [lldb][tests] Automatically call compute_mydir (NFC)
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
2022-06-17 14:34:49 -07:00
Venkata Ramanaiah Nalamothu
c6ad690173 [lldb, test] Fix typos in the lldb tests
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126596
2022-06-02 12:45:57 +05:30
Roman Podoliaka
54c496dad6 [lldb] Allow to register frame recognizers applied beyond the first instruction
It is currently possible to register a frame recognizer, but it will be applied if and only if the frame's PC points to the very first instruction of the specified function, which limits usability of this feature.

The implementation already supports changing this behaviour by passing an additional flag, but it's not possible to set it via the command interface. Fix that.

Reviewed By: jingham

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108510
2021-08-29 17:28:46 +02:00
Chen Zheng
ed88e57f65 [LLDB] Fix buildbots breakage due to TestGuessLanguage.py
Fix LLDB buidbot breakage due to D104291

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104291
2021-06-16 05:03:06 +00:00
Raphael Isemann
54c2687292 [lldb] Introduce createTestTarget for creating a valid target in API tests
At the moment nearly every test calls something similar to
`self.dbg.CreateTarget(self.getBuildArtifact("a.out"))` and them sometimes
checks if the created target is actually valid with something like
`self.assertTrue(target.IsValid(), "some useless text")`.

Beside being really verbose the error messages generated by this pattern are
always just indicating that the target failed to be created but now why.

This patch introduces a helper function `createTestTarget` to our Test class
that creates the target with the much more verbose `CreateTarget` overload that
gives us back an SBError (with a fancy error). If the target couldn't be created
the function prints out the SBError that LLDB returned and asserts for us. It
also defaults to the "a.out" build artifact path that nearly all tests are using
to avoid to hardcode "a.out" in every test.

I converted a bunch of tests to the new function but I'll do the rest of the
test suite as follow ups.

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102771
2021-05-24 16:18:44 +02:00
Muhammad Omair Javaid
428b17ce70 [LLDB] Fix buildbots breakage due to TestGuessLanguage.py
Fix LLDB buidbot breakage due to D99250.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250
2021-04-12 15:10:46 +05:00
Dave Lee
d1a1798e51 [lldb] Replace unneeded use of Foundation with ObjectiveC in tests (NFC)
When referencing `NSObject`, it's enough to import `objc/NSObject.h`. Importing `Foundation` is unnecessary in these cases.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99867
2021-04-04 20:04:41 -07:00
Dave Lee
3cc3762292 [lldb] Use assertIn/NotIn over assertTrue/False (NFC)
For improved failure messages, use `assertIn` over `assertTrue`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96095
2021-02-06 11:52:01 -08:00
Dave Lee
0ed758b260 [lldb] Convert more assertTrue to assertEqual (NFC)
Follow up to D95813, this converts multiline assertTrue to assertEqual.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95899
2021-02-03 21:15:08 -08:00
Michał Górny
311cca8bbf [lldb] [test] Rename '.categories' to 'categories'
Make category-specifying files visible.  There is really no good reason
to keep them hidden, and having them visible increases the chances
that someone will actually spot them.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91065
2020-11-10 12:02:38 +01:00
Michał Górny
a852cf66ea [lldb] [test] Skip ObjC-based tests via 'objc' category
Replace the plethora of ObjC-implied 'skipUnlessDarwin' decorators
with marking tests as 'objc' category (whenever missing), and skip all
ObjC tests on non-Darwin platforms.  I have used '.categories' file
wherever it was present already or all (>1) tests were relying on ObjC,
and explicit add_test_categories() where there was only one test.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91056
2020-11-10 12:02:38 +01:00
Dave Lee
010d7a388b [lldb/test] Catch invalid calls to expect()
Add preconditions to `TestBase.expect()` that catch semantically invalid calls
that happen to succeed anyway. This also fixes the broken callsites caught by
these checks.

This prevents the following incorrect calls:

1. `self.expect("lldb command", "some substr")`
2. `self.expect("lldb command", "assert message", "some substr")`

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88792
2020-10-05 12:41:52 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
86aa8e6363 [lldb] Use target.GetLaunchInfo() instead of creating an empty one.
Update tests that were creating an empty LaunchInfo instead of using the
one coming from the target. This ensures target properties are honored.
2020-08-06 11:51:26 -07:00
Fred Riss
4c9ed3ed3d [lldb/testsuite] Skip 'frame diagnose' tests based on architecture
AFAICS, the feature only works on x86, skipping the tests has nothing to
do with the target being iOS or remote.
2020-08-04 17:45:55 -07:00
Raphael Isemann
5477fbc294 [lldb] Make deleting frame recognizers actually work
Summary:

Frame recognizers are stored alongside a flag that indicates whether they were
deleted by the user. If the flag is set, they are supposed to be ignored by the
rest of the frame recognizer code. 'frame recognizer delete' is supposed to set
that flag. 'frame recognizer clear' however actually deletes all frame
recognizers (so, it doesn't set the flag but directly deletes them from the
list).

The current implementation of this concept is pretty broken. `frame recognizer
delete` sets the flag, but it somehow thinks that the recognizer id is an index
in the recognizer list. That's not true as it's actually just a member of each
recognizer entry. So it actually just sets the `deleted` flag for a random other
recognizer. The tests for the recognizer still pass as `frame recognizer list`
is also broken and just completely ignored the `deleted` flag and lists all
recognizers. Also `frame recognizer delete` just ignores if it can't actually
delete a recognizer if the id is invalid.

I think we can simplify this whole thing by just actually deleting recognizers
instead of making sure all code is actually respecting the `deleted` flag. I
assume the intention of this was to make sure that all recognizers are getting
unique ids over the course of an LLDB session, but as `clear` is actually
deleting them and we keep recycling ids, that didn't really work to begin with.

This patch deletes the `deleted` flag and just actually deletes the stored
recognizer. Also adds the missing error message in case it find a recognizer
with a given id.

Reviewers: mib

Reviewed By: mib

Subscribers: abidh, JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84404
2020-07-23 17:43:37 +02:00
Raphael Isemann
1b7c9eae6d [lldb] Store StackFrameRecognizers in the target instead of a global list
Summary:

Currently the frame recognizers are stored in a global list (the list in the
StackFrameRecognizersManagerImpl singleton to be precise). All commands and
plugins that modify the list are just modifying that global list of recognizers
which is shared by all Target and Debugger instances.

This is clearly against the idea of LLDB being usable as a library and it also
leads to some very obscure errors as now multiple tests are sharing the used
frame recognizers. For example D83400 is currently failing as it reorders some
test_ functions which permanently changes the frame recognizers of all
debuggers/targets. As all frame recognizers are also initialized in a 'once'
guard, it's also impossible to every restore back the original frame recognizers
once they are deleted in a process.

This patch just moves the frame recognizers into the current target. This seems
the way everyone assumes the system works as for example the assert frame
recognizers is using the current target to find the function/so-name to look for
(which only works if the recognizers are stored in the target).

Reviewers: jingham, mib

Reviewed By: jingham, mib

Subscribers: MrHate, JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83757
2020-07-17 09:26:27 +02:00
Raphael Isemann
9010cef2af [lldb] Replace StringConvert with llvm::to_integer when parsing integer values in CommandObjects
Summary:

This replaces the current use of LLDB's own `StringConvert` with LLVM's
`to_integer` which has a less error-prone API and doesn't use special 'error
values' to designate parsing problems.

Where needed I also added missing error handling code that prints a parsing
error instead of continuing with the error value returned from `StringConvert`
(which either gave a cryptic error message or just took the error value
performed an incorrect action with it. For example, `frame recognizer delete -1`
just deleted the frame recognizer at index 0).

Reviewers: #lldb, labath

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: labath, abidh, JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82297
2020-07-01 17:19:31 +02:00
Med Ismail Bennani
db31e2e1e6
[lldb/Target] Support more than 2 symbols in StackFrameRecognizer
This patch changes the way the StackFrame Recognizers match a certain
frame.

Until now, recognizers could be registered with a function
name but also an alternate symbol.
This change is motivated by a test failure for the Assert frame
recognizer on Linux. Depending the version of the libc, the abort
function (triggered by an assertion), could have more than two
signatures (i.e. `raise`, `__GI_raise` and `gsignal`).

Instead of only checking the default symbol name and the alternate one,
lldb will iterate over a list of symbols to match against.

rdar://60386577

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76188

Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
2020-03-18 14:15:58 +01:00
Raphael Isemann
fdea9a4ec9 [lldb] Remove license headers from all test source files
Summary:
Around a third of our test sources have LLVM license headers. This patch removes those headers from all test
sources and also fixes any tests that depended on the length of the license header.

The reasons for this are:

* A few tests verify line numbers and will start failing if the number of lines in the LLVM license header changes. Once I landed my patch for valid SourceLocations in debug info we will probably have even more tests that verify line numbers.
* No other LLVM project is putting license headers in its test files to my knowledge.
* They make the test sources much more verbose than they have to be. Several tests have longer license headers than the actual test source.

For the record, the following tests had their line numbers changed to pass with the removal of the license header:
    lldb-api :: functionalities/breakpoint/breakpoint_by_line_and_column/TestBreakpointByLineAndColumn.py
    lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestGDBRemoteRepro.test
    lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestMultipleTargets.test
    lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestReuseDirectory.test
    lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook-threads.test
    lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook.test
    lldb-api :: lang/objc/exceptions/TestObjCExceptions.py

Reviewers: #lldb, espindola, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere

Subscribers: emaste, aprantl, arphaman, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74839
2020-02-20 08:32:01 +01:00
Raphael Isemann
10df88de21 [lldb] Remove some unnecessary includes from test sources 2020-02-19 14:12:45 +01:00
Raphael Isemann
b3a0c4d7dc [lldb] Replace assertTrue(a == b, "msg") with assertEquals(a, b, "msg") in the test suite
Summary:
The error message from the construct `assertTrue(a == b, "msg") ` are nearly always completely useless for actually debugging the issue.
This patch is just replacing this construct (and similar ones like `assertTrue(a != b, ...)` with the proper call to assertEqual or assertNotEquals.

This patch was mostly written by a shell script with some manual verification afterwards:
```
lang=python
import sys

def sanitize_line(line):
  if line.strip().startswith("self.assertTrue(") and " == " in line:
    line = line.replace("self.assertTrue(", "self.assertEquals(")
    line = line.replace(" == ", ", ", 1)
  if line.strip().startswith("self.assertTrue(") and " != " in line:
    line = line.replace("self.assertTrue(", "self.assertNotEqual(")
    line = line.replace(" != ", ", ", 1)
  return line

for a in sys.argv[1:]:
  with open(a, "r") as f:
    lines = f.readlines()
  with open(a, "w") as f:
    for line in lines:
      f.write(sanitize_line(line))
```

Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: labath

Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74475
2020-02-13 15:00:55 +01:00
Jordan Rupprecht
99451b4453 [lldb][test] Remove symlink for API tests.
Summary: Moves lldbsuite tests to lldb/test/API.

This is a largely mechanical change, moved with the following steps:

```
rm lldb/test/API/testcases
mkdir -p lldb/test/API/{test_runner/test,tools/lldb-{server,vscode}}
mv lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/test_runner/test lldb/test/API/test_runner
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/* -maxdepth 0 -type d | egrep -v "make|plugins|test_runner|tools"); do mv $d lldb/test/API; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-vscode -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | grep -v ".py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-vscode; done
for d in $(find lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 | egrep -v "gdbremote_testcase.py|lldbgdbserverutils.py|socket_packet_pump.py"); do mv $d lldb/test/API/tools/lldb-server; done
```

lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/__init__.py and lldb/test/API/lit.cfg.py were also updated with the new directory structure.

Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71151
2020-02-11 10:03:53 -08:00