The type formatter code is effectively considering empty strings as read
errors, which is wrong. The fix is very simple. We should rely on the
error object and stop checking the size. I also added a test.
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
Embedded nul characters are still printed, and they don't terminate the
string. See also D111634.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120803
When we know the bounds of the array, print any embedded nuls instead of
treating them as terminators. An exception to this rule is made for the
nul character at the very end of the string. We don't print that, as
otherwise 99% of the strings would end in \0. This way the strings
usually come out the same as how the user typed it into the compiler
(char foo[] = "with\0nuls"). It also matches how they come out in gdb.
This resolves a FIXME left from D111399, and leaves another FIXME for dealing
with nul characters in "escape-non-printables=false" mode. In this mode the
characters cause the entire summary string to be terminated prematurely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111634
OSType with less than 8 bytes has special code that isn't tested yet.
The same for C-strings that don't have `const char *` type. Also we're now testing
escaping the ASCII escape sequence (\033).
Reland 90c1af106a20785ffd01c0d6a41db8bc0160fd11 . This changes the char format
tests which were printing the pointer value of the C-string instead of its
contents, so this test failed on other machines. Now they just print the
bytes in a uint128_t.
Original commit description:
The previous tests apparently missed a few code branches in DumpDataExtractor
code. Also renames the 'test_instruction' which had the same name as another
test (and Python therefore ignored the test entirely).
The previous tests apparently missed a few code branches in DumpDataExtractor
code. Also renames the 'test_instruction' which had the same name as another
test (and Python therefore ignored the test entirely).
