Switching to modern `unittest` in
5b386158aacac4b41126983a5379d36ed413d0ea needs xfail annotations to be
known prior to test running. In contrast, skipping can happen at any
time, even during test execution.
Thus, `expectedFailureIfFn` inherently doesn't work. Either we eagerly
evaluate the function and use `expectedFailureIf` instead, or we use a
skip annotation to lazily evaluate the function and potentially skip the
test right before it starts.
- For `expectedFailureAndroid`, the intent seems to be that certain
tests _should_ work on android, but don't. Thus, xfail is appropriate,
to ensure the test is re-enabled once those bugs are ever fixed.
- For the other uses in individual tests, those generally seem to be
cases where the test environment doesn't support the setup required by
the test, and so it isn't meaningful to run the test at all. For those,
a drop-in replacement to `skipTestIfFn` works.
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
Eliminate boilerplate of having each test manually assign to `mydir` by calling
`compute_mydir` in lldbtest.py.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128077
Add a function to make it easier to debug a test failure caused by an
unexpected state.
Currently, tests are using assertEqual which results in a cryptic error
message: "AssertionError: 5 != 10". Even when a test provides a message
to make it clear why a particular state is expected, you still have to
figure out which of the two was the expected state, and what the other
value corresponds to.
We have a function in lldbutil that helps you convert the state number
into a user readable string. This patch adds a wrapper around
assertEqual specifically for comparing states and reporting better error
messages.
The aforementioned error message now looks like this: "AssertionError:
stopped (5) != exited (10)". If the user provided a message, that
continues to get printed as well.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127355
Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).
* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616
There's another test that opens an hard-coded port to talk to debugserver
(TestPlatformSDK.py). Make sure this port and the one in that other
test are different to avoid that potential conflict.
We weren't setting the listener back to the unhijacked one in this
case, so that a continue after the stop fails. It thinks the process
is still running. Also add tests for this behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112747
