On a case insensitive file sytem, the build dir for `test_multiple_c` and
`test_multiple_C` are the same and therefore the log files are in the same
place. This means one tries to clear the log file for the other.
To fix this, make the names unique by adding the meaning of each
protocol packet.
https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb.html/Packets.html#Packets
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
Stop all processes and clear notification queues when disabling non-stop
mode. Ensure that no stop notifications are sent for processes stopped
due to the mode switch.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128893
Fix the response to `?` packet for threads that are running at the time
(in non-stop mode). The previous code would wrongly send or queue
an empty response for them.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128879
Introduce a new %Stdio notification category and use it to send process
output asynchronously when running in non-stop mode. This is an LLDB
extension since GDB does not use the 'O' packet for process output,
just for replies to 'qRcmd' packets.
Using the async notification mechanism implies that only the first
output packet is sent immediately to the client. The client needs
to request subsequent notifications (if any) using the new vStdio packet
(that works pretty much like vStopped for the Stop notification queue).
The packet handler in lldb-server tests is updated to handle the async
stdio packets in addition to the regular O packets. However, due
to the implications noted above, it can only handle the first output
packet sent by the server. Subsequent packets need to be explicitly
requested via vStdio.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128849
Improve handling of multiple successive continue packets in non-stop
mode. More specifically:
1. Explicitly send error response (instead of crashing on assertion)
if the user attempts to resume the same process twice. Since we
do not support thread-level non-stop mode, one needs to always stop
the process explicitly before resuming another thread set.
2. Actually stop the process if "vCont;t" is delivered to a running
process. Similarly, we only support stopping all the running threads
simultaneously (via -1) and return an error in any other case.
With this patch, running multiple processes simultaneously is still
unsupported. The patch also employs a hack to avoid enabling stdio
forwarding on "vCont;t" packet. Both of these issues are addressed
by followup patches.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128710
This reverts commit f8605da8758fbae16410e4ed5493a39429fd73ec.
This is causing buildbot failures and now I see that I have not updated
the tests to use "stop" instead of "trap".
Improve handling of multiple successive continue packets in non-stop
mode. More specifically:
1. Explicitly send error response (instead of crashing on assertion)
if the user attempts to resume the same process twice. Since we
do not support thread-level non-stop mode, one needs to always stop
the process explicitly before resuming another thread set.
2. Actually stop the process if "vCont;t" is delivered to a running
process. Similarly, we only support stopping all the running threads
simultaneously (via -1) and return an error in any other case.
With this patch, running multiple processes simultaneously is still
unsupported. The patch also employs a hack to avoid enabling stdio
forwarding on "vCont;t" packet. Both of these issues are addressed
by followup patches.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128710
Implement the support for %Stop asynchronous notification packet format
in LLGS. This does not implement full support for non-stop mode for
threaded programs -- process plugins continue stopping all threads
on every event. However, it will be used to implement asynchronous
events in multiprocess debugging.
The non-stop protocol is enabled using QNonStop packet. When it is
enabled, the server uses notification protocol instead of regular stop
replies. Since all threads are always stopped, notifications are always
generated for all active threads and copied into stop notification
queue.
If the queue was empty, the initial asynchronous %Stop notification
is sent to the client immediately. The client needs to (eventually)
acknowledge the notification by sending the vStopped packet, in which
case it is popped from the queue and the stop reason for the next thread
is reported. This continues until notification queue is empty again,
in which case an OK reply is sent.
Asychronous notifications are also used for vAttach results and program
exits. The `?` packet uses a hybrid approach -- it returns the first
stop reason synchronously, and exposes the stop reasons for remaining
threads via vStopped queue.
The change includes a test case for a program generating a segfault
on 3 threads. The server is expected to generate a stop notification
for the segfaulting thread, along with the notifications for the other
running threads (with "no stop reason"). This verifies that the stop
reasons are correctly reported for all threads, and that notification
queue works.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125575
