This patch is preparatory work for Scripted Platform support and does
multiple things:
First, it introduces new options for the `platform select` command and
`SBPlatform::Create` API, to hold a reference to the debugger object,
the name of the python script managing the Scripted Platform and a
structured data dictionary that the user can use to pass arbitrary data.
Then, it updates the various `Create` and `GetOrCreate` methods for
the `Platform` and `PlatformList` classes to pass down the new parameter
to the `Platform::CreateInstance` callbacks.
Finally, it updates every callback to reflect these changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139249
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This patch moves the platform creation and selection logic into the
per-debugger platform lists. I've tried to keep functional changes to a
minimum -- the main (only) observable difference in this change is that
APIs, which select a platform by name (e.g.,
Debugger::SetCurrentPlatform) will not automatically pick up a platform
associated with another debugger (or no debugger at all).
I've also added several tests for this functionality -- one of the
pleasant consequences of the debugger isolation is that it is now
possible to test the platform selection and creation logic.
This is a product of the discussion at
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/multiple-platforms-with-the-same-name/59594>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120810
Currently, when creating a target for a fat binary, we error out if more
than one platforms can support the different architectures in the
binary. There are situations where it makes sense for multiple platforms
to support the same architectures: for example the host and
remote-macosx platform on Darwin.
The only way to currently disambiguate between them is to specify the
architecture. This patch changes that to take into account the selected
and host platform. The new algorithm works a follows:
1. Pick the selected platform if it matches any of the architectures.
2. Pick the host platform if it matches any of the architectures.
3. If there's one platform that works for all architectures, pick that.
If none of the above apply then we either have no platform supporting
the architectures in the fat binary or multiple platforms with no good
way to disambiguate between them.
I've added a bunch of unit tests to codify this new behavior.
rdar://90360204
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122684
