I've not tried to change the purpose or style of the doc, just edited
for clarity and removed any Phabricator related language in favour of
GitHub terms.
Where possible, I've swapped direct links to LLVM's website with RST
links to the local documents. Which should be a bit more resilient.
Also it's less confusing if you're editing multiple pages locally, you
don't accidentally end up on the live site.
This adds first version of a GitHub workflow in the documentation and marks some
sections as deprecated. We should clean up these sections ASAP. I was
just keen to get something on the documentation site as soon as
possible.
This has come up a few times recently, and I was surprised to notice that we don't have anything in the docs.
This patch deliberately sticks to stuff that is uncontroversial in the community. Everything herein is thought to be widely agreed to by a large majority of the community. A few things were noted and removed in review which failed this standard, if you spot anything else, please point it out.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99305
This is an update to the documentation of our community code-review process.
Based on the RFC: High-Level Code-Review Documentation Update
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-November/136808.html).
In this patch, I've pulled out the documentation into a separate file, and
broken it into a number of subsections. This is, of course, just one further
step in better documenting our community processes. I expect we'll continue to
improve this over time. Thank you to everyone who provided feedback!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71916
