This reverts commit a772f0bb920a4957fb94dd8dbe45943809fd0ec3.
The main problem was related to how we handled `dbgs()` from the hosted
compiler. Using explicit `subprocess.communicate`, and not relying on
dbgs() being flushed until the end appears to address the problem.
Also some fixes due to some bots running older pythons, so we can't have
nice things like `int | float` and such.
This reverts commit a7354899d1a235a796b3a2ccb45f6596983c8672.
The way stdout/stderr get routed seems to work differently locally and
on the bots. Investigating.
This hooks up the interactive model runner to the passes that support
ml-based decisions. Because the interface to this runner is the exact
same as the one used during inference, we just reuse the exact same
setup we have for "release mode". This makes "release mode" a misnomer -
and that's something we needed to resolve sooner or later (e.g.
supporting more than one embedded model for the same problem was another
reason to drop that nomenclature). That will happen in a subsequent
change.
To use this evaluator, just enable the pass in (currently) "release"
mode, but also pass the base name for the 2 channel files via the
pass-specific flag.
The 2 files are the responsibilty of the hosting process. The added
tests use a minimal, toy such host, illustrating setup and
communication.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143218
Small refactoring in preparation for tests for the interactive mode.
This allows reading the header, and performing observations, as explicit
steps. The latter is in particular necessary because the exit condition
for the interactive host will be that the child process (the compiler)
exited.
This is the next step in dropping the dependency on protobuf.
The simple logger produces an output consisting of lines of json
strings. Tensor values - which should constitute the bulk of the data -
are serialized as raw byte buffers. This allows for light-weight reading
of the values.
The next step is to switch the training logic to the new logging format,
following which the protobuf-based logger will be dropped, together with
the training dependency on protobuf.
Subsequent changes will also stop buffering and stream, instead - the
buffering model is just as a convenient point-in-time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139370
The bulk of the implementation is common between 'release' mode (==AOT-ed
model) and 'development' mode (for training), the main difference is
that in development mode, we may also log features (for training logs),
inject scoring information and then produce the log file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133616
TLite is a lightweight, statically linkable[1], model evaluator, supporting a
subset of what the full tensorflow library does, sufficient for the
types of scenarios we envision having. It is also faster.
We still use saved models as "source of truth" - 'release' mode's AOT
starts from a saved model; and the ML training side operates in terms of
saved models.
Using TFLite solves the following problems compared to using the full TF
C API:
- a compiler-friendly implementation for runtime-loadable (as opposed
to AOT-embedded) models: it's statically linked; it can be built via
cmake;
- solves an issue we had when building the compiler with both AOT and
full TF C API support, whereby, due to a packaging issue on the TF
side, we needed to have the pip package and the TF C API library at
the same version. We have no such constraints now.
The main liability is it supporting a subset of what the full TF
framework does. We do not expect that to cause an issue, but should that
be the case, we can always revert back to using the full framework
(after also figuring out a way to address the problems that motivated
the move to TFLite).
Details:
This change switches the development mode to TFLite. Models are still
expected to be placed in a directory - i.e. the parameters to clang
don't change; what changes is the directory content: we still need
an `output_spec.json` file; but instead of the saved_model protobuf and
the `variables` directory, we now just have one file, `model.tflite`.
The change includes a utility showing how to take a saved model and
convert it to TFLite, which it uses for testing.
The full TF implementation can still be built (not side-by-side). We
intend to remove it shortly, after patching downstream dependencies. The
build behavior, however, prioritizes TFLite - i.e. trying to enable both
full TF C API and TFLite will just pick TFLite.
[1] thanks to @petrhosek's changes to TFLite's cmake support and its deps!
To move from TF C API to TFLite, we found that the argmax op in TFLite does not work for int64 inputs, so cast the int64 inputs to int32 inputs to make TFLite argmax op work
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131462
Currently the autogenerated regalloc model will sometimes
output an incorrect LR index to evict instead of the first LR
with with the mask set to 1. This trips an assertion within
the MLRegallocAdvisor that the evicted LR has a mask of 1. This
patch, made possible by https://reviews.llvm.org/D124565, simplifies
the autogenerated model by taking away all unnecessary features and
getting rid of the functions that were previously to mix in all
the necessary inputs so they wouldn't get pruned by the Tensorflow
XLA AOT compiler. This is no longer necessary after the previously
mentioned patch. This also fixes the nondeterministic behavior
that is sometimes observed where the autogenerated model will
simply output 0 instead of the correct index.
Reviewed By: yundiqian
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129254
The bulk of the implementation is common between 'release' mode (==AOT-ed
model) and 'development' mode (for training), the main difference is
that in development mode, we may also log features (for training logs),
inject scoring information (currently after the Virtual Register
Rewriter) and then produce the log file.
This patch also introduces the score injection pass, 'Register
Allocation Pass Scoring', which is trivially just logging the score in
development mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117147
When looking at building the generator for regalloc, we realized we'd
need quite a bit of custom logic, and that perhaps it'd be easier to
just have each usecase (each kind of mlgo policy) have it's own
stand-alone test generator.
This patch just consolidates the old `config.py` and
`generate_mock_model.py` into one file, and does away with
subdirectories under Analysis/models.
This change yields an additional 2% size reduction on an internal search
binary, and an additional 0.5% size reduction on fuchsia.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104751
They are not conducive to being stored in git. Instead, we autogenerate
mock model artifacts for use in tests. Production models can be
specified with the cmake flag LLVM_INLINER_MODEL_PATH.
LLVM_INLINER_MODEL_PATH has two sentinel values:
- download, which will download the most recent compatible model.
- autogenerate, which will autogenerate a "fake" model for testing the
model uptake infrastructure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104251
We only need the C++ type and the corresponding TF Enum. The other
parameter was used for the output spec json file, but we can just
standardize on the C++ type name there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86549
Different training algorithms may produce models that, besides the main
policy output (i.e. inline/don't inline), produce additional outputs
that are necessary for the next training stage. To facilitate this, in
development mode, we require the training policy infrastructure produce
a description of the outputs that are interesting to it, in the form of
a JSON file. We special-case the first entry in the JSON file as the
inlining decision - we care about its value, so we can guide inlining
during training - but treat the rest as opaque data that we just copy
over to the training log.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85674
Also compacted the checkpoints (variables) to one file (plus the index).
This reduces the binary model files to just the variables and their
index. The index is very small. The variables are serialized float
arrays. When updated through training, the changes are very likely
unlocalized, so there's very little value in them being anything else
than binary.
