170 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jeremy Morse
7d77bbef4a [DebugInfo][RemoveDIs] Add prototype storage classes for "new" debug-info
This patch adds a variety of classes needed to record variable location
debug-info without using the existing intrinsic approach, see the rationale
at [0].

The two added files and corresponding unit tests are the majority of the
plumbing required for this, but at this point isn't accessible from the
rest of LLVM as we need to stage it into the repo gently. An overview is
that classes are added for recording variable information attached to Real
(TM) instructions, in the form of DPValues and DPMarker objects. The
metadata-uses of DPValues is plumbed into the metadata hierachy, and a
field added to class Instruction, which are all stimulated in the unit
tests. The next few patches in this series add utilities to convert to/from
this new debug-info format and add instruction/block utilities to have
debug-info automatically updated in the background when various operations
occur.

This patch was reviewed in Phab in D153990 and D154080, I've squashed them
together into this commit as there are dependencies between the two
patches, and there's little profit in landing them separately.

[0] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-instruction-api-changes-needed-to-eliminate-debug-intrinsics-from-ir/68939
2023-11-02 12:44:53 +00:00
Jeremy Morse
088d272e83 [ADT][DebugInfo][RemoveDIs] Add extra bits to ilist_iterator for debug-info
...behind an experimental CMAKE option that's off by default.

This patch adds a new ilist-iterator-like class that can carry two extra bits
as well as the usual node pointer. This is part of the project to remove
debug-intrinsics from LLVM: see the rationale here [0], they're needed to
signal whether a "position" in a BasicBlock includes any debug-info before or
after the iterator.

This entirely duplicates ilist_iterator, attempting re-use showed it to be a
false economy. It's enable-able through the existing ilist_node options
interface, hence a few sites where the instruction-list type needs to be
updated. The actual main feature, the extra bits in the class, aren't part of
the class unless the cmake flag is given: this is because there's a
compile-time cost associated with it, and I'd like to get everything in-tree
but off-by-default so that we can do proper comparisons.

Nothing actually makes use of this yet, but will do soon, see the Phab patch
stack.

[0] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-instruction-api-changes-needed-to-eliminate-debug-intrinsics-from-ir/68939

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153777
2023-10-17 15:24:44 +01:00
Jeremy Morse
6942c64e81 [NFC][RemoveDIs] Prefer iterator-insertion over instructions
Continuing the patch series to get rid of debug intrinsics [0], instruction
insertion needs to be done with iterators rather than instruction pointers,
so that we can communicate information in the iterator class. This patch
adds an iterator-taking insertBefore method and converts various call sites
to take iterators. These are all sites where such debug-info needs to be
preserved so that a stage2 clang can be built identically; it's likely that
many more will need to be changed in the future.

At this stage, this is just changing the spelling of a few operations,
which will eventually become signifiant once the debug-info bearing
iterator is used.

[0] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-instruction-api-changes-needed-to-eliminate-debug-intrinsics-from-ir/68939

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152537
2023-09-11 11:48:45 +01:00
Nikita Popov
4eafc9b6ff [IR] Treat callbr as special terminator (PR64215)
isLegalToHoistInto() currently return true for callbr instructions.
That means that a callbr with one successor will be considered a
proper loop preheader, which may result in instructions that use
the callbr return value being hoisted past it.

Fix this by adding callbr to isExceptionTerminator (with a rename
to isSpecialTerminator), which also fixes similar assumptions in
other places.

Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/64215.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158609
2023-08-25 09:20:18 +02:00
Arthur Eubanks
3e39cfe5b4 Revert "Revert "InstSimplify: Require instruction be parented""
This reverts commit 0c03f48480f69b854f86d31235425b5cb71ac921.

Going to fix forward size regression instead due to more dependent patches needing to be reverted otherwise.
2023-06-16 13:53:31 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks
0c03f48480 Revert "InstSimplify: Require instruction be parented"
This reverts commit 1536e299e63d7788f38117b0212ca50eb76d7a3b.

Causes large binary size regressions, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/rG1536e299e63d7788f38117b0212ca50eb76d7a3b.
2023-06-16 11:24:29 -07:00
Alan Zhao
d6b4f6786b Revert "Revert "InstSimplify: Require instruction be parented""
This reverts commit 00264eac4d0938ae8a0826da38e4777be269124c.

Reason: caused a bunch of bots to break
2023-06-16 10:58:54 -07:00
Alan Zhao
00264eac4d Revert "InstSimplify: Require instruction be parented"
This reverts commit 1536e299e63d7788f38117b0212ca50eb76d7a3b.

Reason: causes a regression in the inliner (see https://crbug.com/1454531 and https://reviews.llvm.org/rG1536e299e63d7788f38117b0212ca50eb76d7a3b#1217141)
2023-06-16 10:36:49 -07:00
Matt Arsenault
1536e299e6 InstSimplify: Require instruction be parented
Unlike every other analysis and transform, simplifyInstruction
permitted operating on instructions which are not inserted
into a function. This created an edge case no other code needs
to really worry about, and limited transforms in cases that
can make use of the context function. Only the inliner and a handful
of other utilities were making use of this, so just fix up these
edge cases. Results in some IR ordering differences since
cloned blocks are inserted eagerly now. Plus some additional
simplifications trigger (e.g. some add 0s now folded out that
previously didn't).
2023-06-02 18:14:28 -04:00
Phoebe Wang
0efe111365 Reland "[Windows SEH]: HARDWARE EXCEPTION HANDLING (MSVC -EHa) - Part 2"
This reverts commit db6a979ae82410e42430e47afa488936ba8e3025.

Reland D102817 without any change. The previous revert was a mistake.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102817
2023-03-29 08:59:56 +08:00
Vasileios Porpodas
80f2f1eabc [NFC] Rename Function::insertBasicBlockAt() to Function::insert().
I think this is a better name because it is what STL uses.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140068
2022-12-15 10:03:37 -08:00
Vasileios Porpodas
dc891846b8 [NFC] Cleanup: Replace Function::getBasicBlockList().splice() with Function::splice()
This is part of a series of patches that aim at making Function::getBasicBlockList() private.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139984
2022-12-14 15:34:19 -08:00
Vasileios Porpodas
c143b77b30 [NFC] Cleanup: BasicBlock::getInstList() and BasicBlock::getSublistAccess() are now private
We now have an adequate set of API functions, including BasicBlock::splice(),
BasicBlock::erase(), Instruction::insertAt() etc. that we shouldn't need access
to the underlying instruction list.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139905
2022-12-14 10:20:05 -08:00
Vasileios Porpodas
a19ae77d2a [IR][NFC] Adds Function::insertBasicBlockAt() to replace things like F->getBasicBlockList().insert()
This is part of a series of patches that aim at making Function::getBasicBlockList() private.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139906
2022-12-12 20:22:55 -08:00
Fangrui Song
89fae41ef1 [IR] llvm::Optional => std::optional
Many llvm/IR/* files have been migrated by other contributors.
This migrates most remaining files.
2022-12-05 04:13:11 +00:00
Kazu Hirata
e842c06c2d [IR] Use std::nullopt instead of None (NFC)
This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
2022-12-02 20:05:20 -08:00
Vasileios Porpodas
b46902117c [NFC] Cleanup: Replace BB->InstList.splice() with BB->splice()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139236
2022-12-02 16:00:31 -08:00
tentzen
db6a979ae8 Revert "[Windows SEH]: HARDWARE EXCEPTION HANDLING (MSVC -EHa) - Part 2"
This reverts commit 1a949c871ab4a6b6d792849d3e8c0fa6958d27f5.
2022-12-02 02:44:18 -08:00
tentzen
1a949c871a [Windows SEH]: HARDWARE EXCEPTION HANDLING (MSVC -EHa) - Part 2
This patch is the Part-2 (BE LLVM) implementation of HW Exception handling.
Part-1 (FE Clang) was committed in 797ad701522988e212495285dade8efac41a24d4.

This new feature adds the support of Hardware Exception for Microsoft Windows
SEH (Structured Exception Handling).

Compiler options:
  For clang-cl.exe, the option is -EHa, the same as MSVC.
  For clang.exe, the extra option is -fasync-exceptions,
  plus -triple x86_64-windows -fexceptions and -fcxx-exceptions as usual.

NOTE:: Without the -EHa or -fasync-exceptions, this patch is a NO-DIFF change.

The rules for C code:
For C-code, one way (MSVC approach) to achieve SEH -EHa semantic is to follow three rules:
  First, no exception can move in or out of _try region., i.e., no "potential faulty
    instruction can be moved across _try boundary.
  Second, the order of exceptions for instructions 'directly' under a _try must be preserved
    (not applied to those in callees).
  Finally, global states (local/global/heap variables) that can be read outside of _try region
    must be updated in memory (not just in register) before the subsequent exception occurs.

The impact to C++ code:
  Although SEH is a feature for C code, -EHa does have a profound effect on C++
  side. When a C++ function (in the same compilation unit with option -EHa ) is
  called by a SEH C function, a hardware exception occurs in C++ code can also
  be handled properly by an upstream SEH _try-handler or a C++ catch(...).
  As such, when that happens in the middle of an object's life scope, the dtor
  must be invoked the same way as C++ Synchronous Exception during unwinding process.

Design:
A natural way to achieve the rules above in LLVM today is to allow an EH edge
added on memory/computation instruction (previous iload/istore idea) so that
exception path is modeled in Flow graph preciously. However, tracking every
single memory instruction and potential faulty instruction can create many
Invokes, complicate flow graph and possibly result in negative performance
impact for downstream optimization and code generation. Making all
optimizations be aware of the new semantic is also substantial.

This design does not intend to model exception path at instruction level.
Instead, the proposed design tracks and reports EH state at BLOCK-level to
reduce the complexity of flow graph and minimize the performance-impact on CPP
code under -EHa option.
One key element of this design is the ability to compute State number at
block-level. Our algorithm is based on the following rationales:

A _try scope is always a SEME (Single Entry Multiple Exits) region as jumping
into a _try is not allowed. The single entry must start with a seh_try_begin()
invoke with a correct State number that is the initial state of the SEME.
Through control-flow, state number is propagated into all blocks. Side exits
marked by seh_try_end() will unwind to parent state based on existing SEHUnwindMap[].
Note side exits can ONLY jump into parent scopes (lower state number).
Thus, when a block succeeds various states from its predecessors, the lowest
State triumphs others.  If some exits flow to unreachable, propagation on those
paths terminate, not affecting remaining blocks.
For CPP code, object lifetime region is usually a SEME as SEH _try.
However there is one rare exception: jumping into a lifetime that has Dtor but
has no Ctor is warned, but allowed:

Warning: jump bypasses variable with a non-trivial destructor

In that case, the region is actually a MEME (multiple entry multiple exits).
Our solution is to inject a eha_scope_begin() invoke in the side entry block to
ensure a correct State.
Implementation:
Part-1: Clang implementation (already in):
Please see commit 797ad701522988e212495285dade8efac41a24d4).

Part-2 : LLVM implementation described below.

For both C++ & C-code, the state of each block is computed at the same place in
BE (WinEHPreparing pass) where all other EH tables/maps are calculated.
In addition to _scope_begin & _scope_end, the computation of block state also
rely on the existing State tracking code (UnwindMap and InvokeStateMap).

For both C++ & C-code, the state of each block with potential trap instruction
is marked and reported in DAG Instruction Selection pass, the same place where
the state for -EHsc (synchronous exceptions) is done.
If the first instruction in a reported block scope can trap, a Nop is injected
before this instruction. This nop is needed to accommodate LLVM Windows EH
implementation, in which the address in IPToState table is offset by +1.
(note the purpose of that is to ensure the return address of a call is in the
same scope as the call address.

The handler for catch(...) for -EHa must handle HW exception. So it is
'adjective' flag is reset (it cannot be IsStdDotDot (0x40) that only catches
C++ exceptions).
Suppress push/popTerminate() scope (from noexcept/noTHrow) so that HW
exceptions can be passed through.

Original llvm-dev [RFC] discussions can be found in these two threads below:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-March/140541.html
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-April/141338.html

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102817/new/
2022-12-01 23:44:25 -08:00
Vasileios Porpodas
3259caefb3 [IR][NFC] Adds BasicBlock::erase().
Currently the only way to do this is to work with the instruction list directly.
This is part of a series of cleanup patches towards making BasicBlock::getInstList() private.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139142
2022-12-01 17:47:55 -08:00
Vasileios Porpodas
75a3d9d1b3 [IR][NFC] Adds BasicBlock::splice().
Currently the only way to do this is to work with the instruction list directly.
This is part of a series of cleanup patches towards making BasicBlock::getInstList() private.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138977
2022-12-01 13:52:57 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
6ba4b62af8 Return None instead of Optional<T>() (NFC)
This patch replaces:

  return Optional<T>();

with:

  return None;

to make the migration from llvm::Optional to std::optional easier.
Specifically, I can deprecate None (in my source tree, that is) to
identify all the instances of None that should be replaced with
std::nullopt.

Note that "return None" far outnumbers "return Optional<T>();".  There
are more than 2000 instances of "return None" in our source tree.

All of the instances in this patch come from functions that return
Optional<T> except Archive::findSym and ASTNodeImporter::import, where
we return Expected<Optional<T>>.  Note that we can construct
Expected<Optional<T>> from any parameter convertible to Optional<T>,
which None certainly is.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138464
2022-11-21 19:06:42 -08:00
Max Kazantsev
ec2e5b8c92 Fix iterator corruption in splitBasicBlockBefore
We should not delete block predecessors (via replacing successors
of terminators) while iterating them, otherwise we may skip some
of them. Instead, save predecessors to a separate vector and iterate
over it.
2022-10-27 17:54:15 +07:00
Sebastian Neubauer
c7750c522e Add helper func to get first non-alloca position
The LLVM performance tips suggest that allocas should be placed at the
beginning of the entry block. So far, llvm doesn’t provide any helper to
find that position.

Add BasicBlock::getFirstNonPHIOrDbgOrAlloca and IRBuilder::SetInsertPointPastAllocas(Function*)
that get an insert position after the (static) allocas at the start of a
function and use it in ShadowStackGCLowering.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132554
2022-09-09 15:39:53 +02:00
Artur Pilipenko
857d699667 Move BasicBlock::getTerminator definition to the header
This way it can be inlined to its caller. This method
shows up in the profile and it is essentially a fancy
getter. It would benefit from inlining into its callers.

NFC.
2022-04-05 13:11:38 -07:00
serge-sans-paille
e188aae406 Cleanup header dependencies in LLVMCore
Based on the output of include-what-you-use.

This is a big chunk of changes. It is very likely to break downstream code
unless they took a lot of care in avoiding hidden ehader dependencies, something
the LLVM codebase doesn't do that well :-/

I've tried to summarize the biggest change below:

- llvm/include/llvm-c/Core.h: no longer includes llvm-c/ErrorHandling.h
- llvm/IR/DIBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/DebugInfo.h
- llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h
- llvm/IR/LLVMRemarkStreamer.h no longer includes llvm/Support/ToolOutputFile.h
- llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h no longer include llvm/Pass.h
- llvm/IR/Type.h no longer includes llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h
- llvm/IR/PassManager.h no longer includes llvm/Pass.h nor llvm/Support/Debug.h

And the usual count of preprocessed lines:
$ clang++ -E  -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/IR/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
before: 6400831
after:  6189948

200k lines less to process is no that bad ;-)

Discourse thread on the topic: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118652
2022-02-02 06:54:20 +01:00
Kazu Hirata
c23ebf1714 [llvm] Use range-based for loops (NFC) 2021-12-08 20:35:39 -08:00
Philip Reames
de5477ed42 Add a statistic to track number of times we rebuild instruction ordering
The goal here is to assist some future tuning work both on instruction ordering invalidation, and on some client code which uses it.
2021-10-08 10:59:34 -07:00
Nikita Popov
fb9ed1979a [IR] Add BasicBlock::isEntryBlock() (NFC)
This is a recurring and somewhat awkward pattern. Add a helper
method for it.
2021-05-15 12:41:58 +02:00
Kazu Hirata
6a337f85c8 [IR] Use range-based for loops (NFC) 2021-02-27 10:09:25 -08:00
Michael Kruse
b7dee667b6 [OpenMPIRBuilder] Implement tileLoops.
The  tileLoops method implements the code generation part of the tile directive introduced in OpenMP 5.1. It takes a list of loops forming a loop nest, tiles it, and returns the CanonicalLoopInfo representing the generated loops.

The implementation takes n CanonicalLoopInfos, n tile size Values and returns 2*n new CanonicalLoopInfos. The input CanonicalLoopInfos are invalidated and BBs not reused in the new loop nest removed from the function.

In a modified version of D76342, I was able to correctly compile and execute a tiled loop nest.

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92974
2021-01-23 19:39:29 -06:00
Oliver Stannard
76f6b125ce Revert "[llvm] Use BasicBlock::phis() (NFC)"
Reverting because this causes crashes on the 2-stage buildbots, for
example http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/7/builds/1140.

This reverts commit 9b228f107d43341ef73af92865f73a9a076c5a76.
2021-01-07 09:43:33 +00:00
Kazu Hirata
9b228f107d [llvm] Use BasicBlock::phis() (NFC) 2021-01-06 18:27:35 -08:00
Whitney Tsang
2a814cd9e1 Ensure SplitEdge to return the new block between the two given blocks
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.

Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.

/// Original IR
bb0:
	br bb1
bb1:
        %0 = mul i32 1, 2
	br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
	br bb1
bb1:
	br bb1.split
bb1.split:
        %0 = mul i32 1, 2
	br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
	br bb1.split
bb1.split
	br bb1
bb1:
        %0 = mul i32 1, 2
	br bb2
bb2:

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
2020-12-18 17:37:17 +00:00
Bangtian Liu
511cfe9441 Revert "Ensure SplitEdge to return the new block between the two given blocks"
This reverts commit d20e0c3444ad9ada550d9d6d1d56fd72948ae444.
2020-12-17 21:00:37 +00:00
Bangtian Liu
d20e0c3444 Ensure SplitEdge to return the new block between the two given blocks
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.

Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.

/// Original IR
bb0:
	br bb1
bb1:
        %0 = mul i32 1, 2
	br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
	br bb1
bb1:
	br bb1.split
bb1.split:
        %0 = mul i32 1, 2
	br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
	br bb1.split
bb1.split
	br bb1
bb1:
        %0 = mul i32 1, 2
	br bb2
bb2:

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
2020-12-17 16:00:15 +00:00
Bangtian Liu
c10757200d Revert "Ensure SplitEdge to return the new block between the two given blocks"
This reverts commit cf638d793c489632bbcf0ee0fbf9d0f8c76e1f48.
2020-12-16 11:52:30 +00:00
Bangtian Liu
cf638d793c Ensure SplitEdge to return the new block between the two given blocks
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an
issue
that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore.
The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor
and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces
the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore
was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces
the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’.

Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction.

/// Original IR
bb0:
	br bb1
bb1:
        %0 = mul i32 1, 2
	br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock
bb0:
	br bb1
bb1:
	br bb1.split
bb1.split:
        %0 = mul i32 1, 2
	br bb2
bb2:
/// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore
bb0:
	br bb1.split
bb1.split
	br bb1
bb1:
        %0 = mul i32 1, 2
	br bb2
bb2:

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
2020-12-15 23:32:29 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
1dc38f8cfb [IR] improve code comment/logic in removePredecessor(); NFC
This was suggested in the post-commit review of ce134da4b1.
2020-11-30 10:51:30 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
355aee3dcd Revert "[IR][LoopRotate] avoid leaving phi with no operands (PR48296)"
This reverts commit bfd2c216ea8ef09f8fb1f755ca2b89f86f74acbb.
This appears to be causing stage2 msan failures on buildbots:
  FAIL: LLVM :: Transforms/SimplifyCFG/X86/bug-25299.ll (65872 of 71835)
  ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: Transforms/SimplifyCFG/X86/bug-25299.ll' FAILED ********************
  Script:
  --
  : 'RUN: at line 1';   /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/opt < /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/X86/bug-25299.ll -simplifycfg -S | /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm_build_msan/bin/FileCheck /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/X86/bug-25299.ll
  --
  Exit Code: 2
  Command Output (stderr):
  --
  ==87374==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
      #0 0x9de47b6 in getBasicBlockIndex /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Instructions.h:2749:5
      #1 0x9de47b6 in simplifyCommonResume /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp:4112:23
      #2 0x9de47b6 in simplifyResume /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp:4039:12
      #3 0x9de47b6 in (anonymous namespace)::SimplifyCFGOpt::simplifyOnce(llvm::BasicBlock*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp:6330:16
      #4 0x9dcca13 in run /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp:6358:16
      #5 0x9dcca13 in llvm::simplifyCFG(llvm::BasicBlock*, llvm::TargetTransformInfo const&, llvm::SimplifyCFGOptions const&, llvm::SmallPtrSetImpl<llvm::BasicBlock*>*) /b/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast/build/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp:6369:8
      #6 0x974643d in iterativelySimplifyCFG(
2020-11-30 10:15:42 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
bfd2c216ea [IR][LoopRotate] avoid leaving phi with no operands (PR48296)
https://llvm.org/PR48296 shows an example where we delete all of the operands
of a phi without actually deleting the phi, and that is currently considered
invalid IR. The reduced test included here would crash for that reason.

A suggested follow-up is to loosen the assert to allow 0-operand phis
in unreachable blocks.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92247
2020-11-30 09:28:45 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
ce134da4b1 [IR] simplify code in removePredecessor(); NFCI
As suggested in D92247 (and independent of whatever we decide to do there),
this code is confusing as-is. Hopefully, this is at least mildly better.

We might be able to do better still, but we have a function called
"removePredecessor" with this behavior:
"Note that this function does not actually remove the predecessor." (!)
2020-11-29 09:55:04 -05:00
Sanjay Patel
2cebad702c [IR] remove redundant code comments; NFC
As noted in D92247 (and independent of that patch):

http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#doxygen-use-in-documentation-comments

"Don’t duplicate the documentation comment in the header file and in the
implementation file. Put the documentation comments for public APIs into
the header file."
2020-11-29 09:29:59 -05:00
Hongtao Yu
f3c445697d [CSSPGO] IR intrinsic for pseudo-probe block instrumentation
This change introduces a new IR intrinsic named `llvm.pseudoprobe` for pseudo-probe block instrumentation. Please refer to https://reviews.llvm.org/D86193 for the whole story.

A pseudo probe is used to collect the execution count of the block where the probe is instrumented. This requires a pseudo probe to be persisting. The LLVM PGO instrumentation also instruments in similar places by placing a counter in the form of atomic read/write operations or runtime helper calls. While these operations are very persisting or optimization-resilient, in theory we can borrow the atomic read/write implementation from PGO counters and cut it off at the end of compilation with all the atomics converted into binary data. This was our initial design and we’ve seen promising sample correlation quality with it. However, the atomics approach has a couple issues:

1. IR Optimizations are blocked unexpectedly. Those atomic instructions are not going to be physically present in the binary code, but since they are on the IR till very end of compilation, they can still prevent certain IR optimizations and result in lower code quality.
2. The counter atomics may not be fully cleaned up from the code stream eventually.
3. Extra work is needed for re-targeting.

We choose to implement pseudo probes based on a special LLVM intrinsic, which is expected to have most of the semantics that comes with an atomic operation but does not block desired optimizations as much as possible. More specifically the semantics associated with the new intrinsic enforces a pseudo probe to be virtually executed exactly the same number of times before and after an IR optimization. The intrinsic also comes with certain flags that are carefully chosen so that the places they are probing are not going to be messed up by the optimizer while most of the IR optimizations still work. The core flags given to the special intrinsic is `IntrInaccessibleMemOnly`, which means the intrinsic accesses memory and does have a side effect so that it is not removable, but is does not access memory locations that are accessible by any original instructions. This way the intrinsic does not alias with any original instruction and thus it does not block optimizations as much as an atomic operation does. We also assign a function GUID and a block index to an intrinsic so that they are uniquely identified and not merged in order to achieve good correlation quality.

Let's now look at an example. Given the following LLVM IR:

```
define internal void @foo2(i32 %x, void (i32)* %f) !dbg !4 {
bb0:
  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %x, 0
   br i1 %cmp, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
   br label %bb3
bb2:
   br label %bb3
bb3:
   ret void
}
```

The instrumented IR will look like below. Note that each `llvm.pseudoprobe` intrinsic call represents a pseudo probe at a block, of which the first parameter is the GUID of the probe’s owner function and the second parameter is the probe’s ID.

```
define internal void @foo2(i32 %x, void (i32)* %f) !dbg !4 {
bb0:
   %cmp = icmp eq i32 %x, 0
   call void @llvm.pseudoprobe(i64 837061429793323041, i64 1)
   br i1 %cmp, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
   call void @llvm.pseudoprobe(i64 837061429793323041, i64 2)
   br label %bb3
bb2:
   call void @llvm.pseudoprobe(i64 837061429793323041, i64 3)
   br label %bb3
bb3:
   call void @llvm.pseudoprobe(i64 837061429793323041, i64 4)
   ret void
}

```

Reviewed By: wmi

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86490
2020-11-20 10:39:24 -08:00
Kazu Hirata
aa06951377 [IR] Use llvm::is_contained in BasicBlock::removePredecessor (NFC) 2020-11-15 21:15:31 -08:00
Jay Foad
6fdd5a28b7 Revert "[IR] Clean up dead instructions after simplifying a conditional branch"
This reverts commit 69bdfb075b293c4b3363f2dc0ac732ca03c3c9ca.

Reverting to investigate https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46343
2020-06-16 10:32:15 +01:00
Jay Foad
69bdfb075b [IR] Clean up dead instructions after simplifying a conditional branch
Change BasicBlock::removePredecessor to optionally return a vector of
instructions which might be dead. Use this in ConstantFoldTerminator to
delete them if they are dead.

Reapply with a bug fix: don't drop the "!KeepOneInputPHIs" argument when
removePredecessor calls PHINode::removeIncomingValue.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80206
2020-06-11 14:53:01 +01:00
Jay Foad
f45c65aa41 Revert "[IR] Clean up dead instructions after simplifying a conditional branch"
This reverts commit 4494e45316a0bfaabb6bb1450fb0f49a0e6832af.

It caused problems for sanitizer buildbots.
2020-06-11 14:22:16 +01:00
Jay Foad
4494e45316 [IR] Clean up dead instructions after simplifying a conditional branch
Change BasicBlock::removePredecessor to optionally return a vector of
instructions which might be dead. Use this in ConstantFoldTerminator to
delete them if they are dead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80206
2020-06-11 13:28:10 +01:00
Jay Foad
e5fc9a3604 [IR] Simplify BasicBlock::removePredecessor. NFCI.
This is the second attempt at landing this patch, after fixing the
KeepOneInputPHIs behaviour to also keep zero input PHIs.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80141
2020-05-20 09:58:21 +01:00