The reasons are:
1, `AVRMCCodeEmitter::emitInstruction` has only one use which is `AVRMCCodeEmitter::encodeInstruction`, and the parameter `STI` is not used in this function. I think it might be copied from other target.
2, We do have `AVRAsmPrinter::emitInstruction`, and it would invoke `AVRMCCodeEmitter::encodeInstruction` in its calling chain, so if we call `AVRMCCodeEmitter::emitInstruction` in `AVRMCCodeEmitter::encodeInstruction`, it would be confusing.
Reviewed By: benshi001
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155426
The current inconsistency confuse contributors which coding guidlines to follow.
It would be better to have it consistent using clang-format tool.
Reviewed By: mhjacobson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109270
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
