This patch replaces uses of StringRef::{starts,ends}with with
StringRef::{starts,ends}_with for consistency with
std::{string,string_view}::{starts,ends}_with in C++20.
I'm planning to deprecate and eventually remove
StringRef::{starts,ends}with.
Extend llvm-objdump to show CO-RE relocations when `-r` option is
passed and object file has .BTF and .BTF.ext sections.
For example, the following C program:
#define __pai __attribute__((preserve_access_index))
struct foo { int i; int j;} __pai;
struct bar { struct foo f[7]; } __pai;
extern void sink(void *);
void root(struct bar *bar) {
sink(&bar[2].f[3].j);
}
Should lead to the following objdump output:
$ clang --target=bpf -O2 -g t.c -c -o - | \
llvm-objdump --no-addresses --no-show-raw-insn -dr -
...
r2 = 0x94
CO-RE <byte_off> [2] struct bar::[2].f[3].j (2:0:3:1)
r1 += r2
call -0x1
R_BPF_64_32 sink
exit
...
More examples could be found in unit tests, see BTFParserTest.cpp.
To achieve this:
- Move CO-RE relocation kinds definitions from BPFCORE.h to BTF.h.
- Extend BTF.h with types derived from BTF::CommonType, e.g.
BTF::IntType and BTF::StrutType, to allow dyn_cast() and access to
type additional data.
- Extend BTFParser to load BTF type and relocation data.
- Modify llvm-objdump.cpp to create instance of BTFParser when
disassembly of object file with BTF sections is processed and `-r`
flag is supplied.
Additional information about CO-RE is available at [1].
[1] https://docs.kernel.org/bpf/llvm_reloc.html
Depends on D149058
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150079
When LLVM is build with `LLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS=ON` option the
following C code snippet:
struct t {
int a;
} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
void test(struct t *t) {
t->a = 42;
}
Causes an assertion:
$ clang -g -O2 -c --target=bpf -mcpu=v2 t.c -o /dev/null
Function Live Ins: $r1 in %0
bb.0.entry:
liveins: $r1
DBG_VALUE $r1, $noreg, !"t", ...
%0:gpr = COPY $r1
DBG_VALUE %0:gpr, $noreg, !"t", ...
%1:gpr = LD_imm64 @"llvm.t:0:0$0:0"
%3:gpr = ADD_rr %0:gpr(tied-def 0), killed %1:gpr
%4:gpr = MOV_ri 42
CORE_MEM killed %4:gpr, 411, %0:gpr, @"llvm.t:0:0$0:0", ...
RET debug-location !25; t.c:7:1
*** Bad machine code: Explicit definition marked as use ***
- function: test
- basic block: %bb.0 entry (0x6210000d8a90)
- instruction: CORE_MEM killed %4:gpr, 411, %0:gpr, @"llvm.t:0:0$0:0", ...
- operand 0: killed %4:gpr
This happens because `CORE_MEM` instruction is defined to have output
operands:
def CORE_MEM : TYPE_LD_ST<BPF_MEM.Value, BPF_W.Value,
(outs GPR:$dst),
(ins u64imm:$opcode, GPR:$src, u64imm:$offset),
"$dst = core_mem($opcode, $src, $offset)",
[]>;
As documented in [1]:
> By convention, the LLVM code generator orders instruction operands
> so that all register definitions come before the register uses, even
> on architectures that are normally printed in other orders.
In other words, the first argument for `CORE_MEM` is considered to be
a "def", while in reality it is "use":
%1:gpr = LD_imm64 @"llvm.t:0:0$0:0"
%3:gpr = ADD_rr %0:gpr(tied-def 0), killed %1:gpr
%4:gpr = MOV_ri 42
'---------------.
v
CORE_MEM killed %4:gpr, 411, %0:gpr, @"llvm.t:0:0$0:0", ...
Here is how `CORE_MEM` is constructed in
`BPFMISimplifyPatchable::checkADDrr()`:
BuildMI(*DefInst->getParent(), *DefInst, DefInst->getDebugLoc(), TII->get(COREOp))
.add(DefInst->getOperand(0)).addImm(Opcode).add(*BaseOp)
.addGlobalAddress(GVal);
Note that first operand is constructed as `.add(DefInst->getOperand(0))`.
For `LD{D,W,H,B}` instructions the `DefInst->getOperand(0)` is a
destination register of a load, so instruction is constructed in
accordance with `outs` declaration.
For `ST{D,W,H,B}` instructions the `DefInst->getOperand(0)` is a
source register of a store (value to be stored), so instruction
violates the `outs` declaration.
This commit fixes the issue by splitting `CORE_MEM` in three
instructions: `CORE_ST`, `CORE_LD64`, `CORE_LD32` with correct `outs`
specifications.
[1] https://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#the-machineinstr-class
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157806
When compiling Rust code we may end up with calls to functions provided
by other code units. Presently this code crashes on a null pointer
dereference - this patch avoids that crash and adds a test.
Reviewed By: ast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156446
When compiling Rust code we sometimes see incomplete debug info leading
to crashes. Narrow the interfaces so we can see where it happens.
Reviewed By: ajwerner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D156443
There are plans to add some BTF processing to tools like objdump and
readelf. This commit moves BTF.{h,def} files from BPF target specific
location to include/llvm/DebugInfo/* to avoid tools including headers
from lib/Target/*.
Reviewed By: yonghong-song, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149501
Commit 3671bdbcd214("[BPF] Fix a BTF type pruning bug") fixed a
pruning bug to allow generate more types. But the commit has a bug
which permits to generate more types than necessary. The following
is an example to illustrate the problem.
struct t1 {
int a;
};
struct t2 {
struct t1 *p1;
struct t1 *p2;
int b;
};
int foo(struct t2 *arg) {
return arg->b;
}
The following is the part of BTF generation sequence:
(1). 'struct t2 *arg' -> 'struct t1 *p1'
In this step, the type 'struct t1' will be generated as
a forward decl and the ptr type (to 'struct t1') will
be stored in the internal type table.
(2). now the second field 'struct t1 *p2' will be processed.
Since the ptr type (to 'struct t1') already in the type
table, the existing logic strips out ptr modifier and
is able to generate BTF type for 'struct t1'.
In the above step (2), if CheckPointer is true (the type traversal
chain including a struct member), 'ptr' modifier should be checked
and the subsequent type generation should be skipped since
the same case has been processed in visitDerivedType().
The issue is exposed when I am trying to use llvm15 to compile
some internal bpf programs. The bpf skeleton put the whole
ELF section (after striping some sections like dwarf) as a string.
The large BTF section triggered the following error:
bpf_object_with_struct_ops_test_prog_bpf/BpfObjectWithStructOpsTestProg.skel.h:222:23:
error: string literal of length 140144 exceeds maximum length 65536 that C++ compilers
are required to support [-Werror,-Woverlength-strings]
return (const void *)"\
^~
1 error generated.
Although adding -Wno-overlength-strings could workaround the issue,
improving llvm BTF generation sounds better esp. for users using vmlinux.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145816
After frontend changes in the following commit:
"BPF: preserve btf_decl_tag for parameters of extern functions"
same mechanics could be used to get the list of function parameters
and associated btf_decl_tag entries for both extern and non-extern
functions.
This commit extracts this mechanics as a separate auxiliary function
BTFDebug::processDISubprogram(). The function is called for both
extern and non-extern functions in order to generated corresponding
BTF_DECL_TAG records.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140971
Use function TargetLoweringObjectFile::SectionForGlobal() to compute
section names for globals described in BTF_KIND_DATASEC records.
This fixes a discrepancy in section name computation between
BTFDebug::processGlobals and the rest of the LLVM pipeline.
Specifically, the following example illustrates the discrepancy
before this commit:
struct Foo {
int i;
} __attribute__((aligned(16)));
struct Foo foo = { 0 };
The initializer for 'foo' looks as follows:
%struct.Foo { i32 0, [12 x i8] undef }
TargetLoweringObjectFile::SectionForGlobal() classifies 'foo' as
a part of '.bss' section, while BTFDebug::processGlobals
classified it as a part of '.data' section because of the
following expression:
SecName = Global.getInitializer()->isZeroValue() ? ".bss" : ".data"
The isZeroValue() returns false because of the undef tail of the
initializer, while SectionForGlobal() allows such patterns in '.bss'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140505
Current BTF only supports 32-bit value. For example,
enum T { VAL = 0xffffFFFF00000008 };
the generated BTF looks like
.long 16 # BTF_KIND_ENUM(id = 4)
.long 100663297 # 0x6000001
.long 8
.long 18
.long 8
The encoded value is 8 which equals to (uint32_t)0xffffFFFF00000008
and this is incorrect.
This patch introduced BTF_KIND_ENUM64 which permits to encode
64-bit value. The format for each enumerator looks like:
.long name_offset
.long (uint32_t)value # lower-32 bit value
.long value >> 32 # high-32 bit value
We use two 32-bit values to represent a 64-bit value as current
BTF type subsection has 4-byte alignment and gaps are not permitted
in the subsection.
This patch also added support for kflag (the bit 31 of CommonType.Info)
such that kflag = 1 implies the value is signed and kflag = 0
implies the value is unsigned. The kernel UAPI enumerator definition is
struct btf_enum {
__u32 name_off;
__s32 val;
};
so kflag = 0 with unsigned value provides backward compatability.
With this patch, for
enum T { VAL = 0xffffFFFF00000008 };
the generated BTF looks like
.long 16 # BTF_KIND_ENUM64(id = 4)
.long 3187671053 # 0x13000001
.long 8
.long 18
.long 8 # 0x8
.long 4294967295 # 0xffffffff
and the enumerator value and signedness are encoded correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124641
In BPF backend, BTF type generation may skip
some debuginfo types if they are the pointee
type of a struct member. For example,
struct task_struct {
...
struct mm_struct *mm;
...
};
BPF backend may generate a forward decl for
'struct mm_struct' instead of full type if
there are no other usage of 'struct mm_struct'.
The reason is to avoid bringing too much unneeded types
in BTF.
Alexei found a pruning bug where we may miss
some full type generation. The following is an illustrating
example:
struct t1 { ... }
struct t2 { struct t1 *p; };
struct t2 g;
void foo(struct t1 *arg) { ... }
In the above case, we will have partial debuginfo chain like below:
struct t2 -> member p
\ -> ptr -> struct t1
/
foo -> argument arg
During traversing
struct t2 -> member p -> ptr -> struct t1
The corresponding BTF types are generated except 'struct t1' which
will be in FixUp stage. Later, when traversing
foo -> argument arg -> ptr -> struct t1
The 'ptr' BTF type has been generated and currently implementation
ignores 'pointer' type hence 'struct t1' is not generated.
This patch fixed the issue not just for the above case, but for
general case with multiple derived types, e.g.,
struct t2 -> member p
\ -> const -> ptr -> volatile -> struct t1
/
foo -> argument arg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119986
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi reported a bug ([1]) where BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG types
are not generated.
Currently, BPF backend only generates BTF types which are used by
the program, e.g., global variables, functions and some builtin functions.
For example, suppose we have
struct task_struct {
...
struct task_group *sched_task_group;
struct mm_struct *mm;
...
pid_t pid;
pid_t tgid;
...
}
If BPF program intends to access task_struct->pid and task_struct->tgid,
there really no need to generate BTF types for struct task_group
and mm_struct.
In BPF backend, during BTF generation, when generating BTF for struct
task_struct, if types for task_group and mm_struct have not been generated
yet, a Fixup structure will be created, which will be reexamined later
to instantiate into either a full type or a forward type.
In current implementation, if we have something like
struct foo {
struct bar __tag1 *f;
};
and when generating types for struct foo, struct bar type
has not been generated, the __tag1 will be lost during later
Fixup instantiation. This patch fixed this issue by properly
handling btf_type_tag's during Fixup instantiation stage.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220210232411.pmhzj7v5uptqby7r@apollo.legion/
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119799
Instead use either Type::getPointerElementType() or
Type::getNonOpaquePointerElementType().
This is part of D117885, in preparation for deprecating the API.
For the declaration like below:
int __tag1 * __tag1 __tag2 *g
Commit 41860e602aaa ("BPF: Support btf_type_tag attribute")
implemented the following encoding:
VAR(g) -> __tag1 --> __tag2 -> pointer -> __tag1 -> pointer -> int
Some further experiments with linux btf_type_tag support, esp.
with generating attributes in vmlinux.h, and also some internal
discussion showed the following format is more desirable:
VAR(g) -> pointer -> __tag2 -> __tag1 -> pointer -> __tag1 -> int
The format makes it similar to other modifier like 'const', e.g.,
const int *g
which has encoding VAR(g) -> PTR -> CONST -> int
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113496
A new kind BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG is defined. The tags associated
with a pointer type are emitted in their IR order as modifiers.
For example, for the following declaration:
int __tag1 * __tag1 __tag2 *g;
The BTF type chain will look like
VAR(g) -> __tag1 --> __tag2 -> pointer -> __tag1 -> pointer -> int
In the above "->" means BTF CommonType.Type which indicates
the point-to type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113222
If a typedef type has __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("str"))) with
bpf target, emit BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG for that type in the BTF.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112259
Currently, .BTF and .BTF.ext has default alignment of 1.
For example,
$ cat t.c
int foo() { return 0; }
$ clang -target bpf -O2 -c -g t.c
$ llvm-readelf -S t.o
...
Section Headers:
[Nr] Name Type Address Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf Al
...
[ 7] .BTF PROGBITS 0000000000000000 000167 00008b 00 0 0 1
[ 8] .BTF.ext PROGBITS 0000000000000000 0001f2 000050 00 0 0 1
But to have no misaligned data access, .BTF and .BTF.ext
actually requires alignment of 4. Misalignment is not an issue
for architecture like x64/arm64 as it can handle it well. But
some architectures like mips may incur a trap if .BTF/.BTF.ext
is not properly aligned.
This patch explicitly forced .BTF and .BTF.ext alignment to be 4.
For the above example, we will have
[ 7] .BTF PROGBITS 0000000000000000 000168 00008b 00 0 0 4
[ 8] .BTF.ext PROGBITS 0000000000000000 0001f4 000050 00 0 0 4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112106
There are no functionality change.
Fix some comments and rename processAnnotations() to
processDeclAnnotations() to avoid confusion when later
BTF_KIND_TYPE_TAG is introduced (https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199).
Per discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D111199,
the existing btf_tag attribute will be renamed to
btf_decl_tag. This patch updated BTF backend to
use btf_decl_tag attribute name and also
renamed BTF_KIND_TAG to BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111592
Previously we have the following binary representation:
struct bpf_type { name, info, type }
struct btf_tag { __u32 component_idx; }
If the tag points to a struct/union/var/func type, we will have
kflag = 1, component_idx = 0
if the tag points to struct/union member or func argument, we will have
kflag = 0, component_idx = 0, ..., vlen - 1
The above rather makes interface complex to have both kflag and
component needed to determine its legality and index.
This patch simplifies the interface by removing kflag involvement.
component_idx = (u32)-1 : tag pointing to a type
component_idx = 0 ... vlen - 1 : tag pointing to a member or argument
and kflag is always 0 and there is no need to check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109560
A new kind BTF_KIND_TAG is added to .BTF to encode
btf_tag attributes. The format looks like
CommonType.name : attribute string
CommonType.type : attached to a struct/union/func/var.
CommonType.info : encoding BTF_KIND_TAG
kflag == 1 to indicate the attribute is
for CommonType.type, or kflag == 0
for struct/union member or func argument.
one uint32_t : to encode which member/argument starting from 0.
If one particular type or member/argument has more than one attribute,
multiple BTF_KIND_TAG will be generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106622
For an example like below,
extern int do_work(int);
long bpf_helper(void *callback_fn);
long prog() {
return bpf_helper(&do_work);
}
The final generated codes look like:
r1 = do_work ll
call bpf_helper
exit
where we have debuginfo for do_work() extern function:
!17 = !DISubprogram(name: "do_work", ...)
This patch implemented to add additional checking
in processing LD_imm64 operands for possible function pointers
so BTF for bpf function do_work() can be properly generated.
The original llvm function name processReloc() is renamed to
processGlobalValue() to better reflect what the function is doing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100568
Currently, for any extern variable, if it doesn't have
section attribution, it will be put into a default ".extern"
btf DataSec. The initial design is to put every extern
variable in a DataSec so libbpf can use it.
But later on, libbpf actually requires extern variables
to put into special sections, e.g., ".kconfig", ".ksyms", etc.
so they can be used properly based on section name.
Andrii mentioned since ".extern" variables are
not actually used, it makes sense to remove it from
the compiler so libbpf does not need to deal with it,
esp. for static linking. The BTF for these extern variables
is still generated.
With this patch, I tested kernel selftests/bpf and all tests
passed. Indeed, removing ".extern" DataSec seems having no
impact.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100392
For a global weak symbol defined as below:
char g __attribute__((weak)) = 2;
LLVM generates an allocated global with WeakAnyLinkage,
for which BPF backend generates proper BTF info.
For the above example, if a modifier "const" is added like
const char g __attribute__((weak)) = 2;
LLVM generates an allocated global with WeakODRLinkage,
for which BPF backend didn't generate any BTF as it
didn't handle WeakODRLinkage.
This patch addes support for WeakODRLinkage and proper
BTF info can be generated for weak symbol defined with
"const" modifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100362
This permits extern function (BTF_KIND_FUNC) be added
to BTF_KIND_DATASEC if a section name is specified.
For example,
-bash-4.4$ cat t.c
void foo(int) __attribute__((section(".kernel.funcs")));
int test(void) {
foo(5);
return 0;
}
The extern function foo (BTF_KIND_FUNC) will be put into
BTF_KIND_DATASEC with name ".kernel.funcs".
This will help to differentiate two kinds of external functions,
functions in kernel and functions defined in other bpf programs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93563
Some BPF programs compiled on s390 fail to load, because s390
arch-specific linux headers contain float and double types. At the
moment there is no BTF_KIND for floats and doubles, so the release
version of LLVM ends up emitting type id 0 for them, which the
in-kernel verifier does not accept.
Introduce support for such types to libbpf by representing them using
the new BTF_KIND_FLOAT.
Reviewed By: yonghong-song
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83289
This lets external consumers customize the output, similar to how
AssemblyAnnotationWriter lets the caller define callbacks when printing
IR. The array of handlers already existed, this just cleans up the code
so that it can be exposed publically.
Replaces https://reviews.llvm.org/D74158
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89613
This lets external consumers customize the output, similar to how
AssemblyAnnotationWriter lets the caller define callbacks when printing
IR. The array of handlers already existed, this just cleans up the code
so that it can be exposed publically.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74158
Four new CO-RE relocations are introduced:
- TYPE_EXISTENCE: whether a typedef/record/enum type exists
- TYPE_SIZE: the size of a typedef/record/enum type
- ENUM_VALUE_EXISTENCE: whether an enum value of an enum type exists
- ENUM_VALUE: the enum value of an enum type
These additional relocations will make CO-RE bpf programs
more adaptive for potential kernel internal data structure
changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83878
PassManager.h is one of the top headers in the ClangBuildAnalyzer frontend worst offenders list.
This exposes a large number of implicit dependencies on various forward declarations/includes in other headers that need addressing.
Currently, BTF datasec type for .rodata is generated only if there are
user-defined readonly global variables which have debuginfo generated.
Certain readonly global variables may be generated from initialized
local variables. For example,
void foo(const void *);
int test() {
const struct {
unsigned a[4];
char b;
} val = { .a = {2, 3, 4, 5}, .b = 6 };
foo(&val);
return 0;
}
The clang will create a private linkage const global to store
the initialized value:
@__const.test.val = private unnamed_addr constant %struct.anon
{ [4 x i32] [i32 2, i32 3, i32 4, i32 5], i8 6 }, align 4
This global variable eventually is put in .rodata ELF section.
If there is .rodata ELF section, libbpf expects a BTF .rodata
datasec as well even though it may be empty meaning there are no
global readonly variables with proper debuginfo. Martin reported
a bug where without this empty BTF .rodata datasec, the bpftool
gen will exit with an error.
This patch fixed the issue by generating .rodata BTF datasec
if there exists local var intial data which will result in
.rodata ELF section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84002
Currently, llvm when see a global variable in .maps section,
it ensures its type must be a struct type. Then pointee
will be further evaluated for the structure members.
In normal cases, the pointee type will be skipped.
Although this is what current all bpf programs are doing,
but it is a little bit restrictive. For example, it is legitimate
for users to have:
typedef struct { int key_size; int value_size; } __map_t;
__map_t map __attribute__((section(".maps")));
This patch lifts this restriction and typedef of
a struct type is also allowed for .maps section variables.
To avoid create unnecessary fixup entries when traversal
started with typedef/struct type, the new implementation
first traverse all map struct members and then traverse
the typedef/struct type. This way, in internal BTFDebug
implementation, no fixup entries are generated.
Two new unit tests are added for typedef and const
struct in .maps section. Also tested with kernel bpf selftests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83638
Currently, BTF generation stops at pointer struct members
if the pointee type is a struct. This is to avoid bloating
generated BTF size. The following is the process to
correctly record types for these pointee struct types.
- During type traversal stage, when a struct member, which
is a pointer to another struct, is encountered,
the pointee struct type, keyed with its name, is
remembered in a Fixup map.
- Later, when all type traversal is done, the Fixup map
is scanned, based on struct name matching, to either
resolve as pointing to a real already generated type
or as a forward declaration.
Andrii discovered a bug if the struct member pointee struct
is anonymous. In this case, a struct with empty name is
recorded in Fixup map, and later it happens another anonymous
struct with empty name is defined in BTF. So wrong type
resolution happens.
To fix the problem, if the struct member pointee struct
is anonymous, pointee struct type will be generated in
stead of being put in Fixup map.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82976
In BTF, pointee type pruning is used to reduce cluttering
too many unused types into prog BTF. For example,
struct task_struct {
...
struct mm_struct *mm;
...
}
If bpf program does not access members of "struct mm_struct",
there is no need to bring types for "struct mm_struct" to BTF.
This patch fixed a bug where an incorrect pruning happened.
The test case like below:
struct t;
typedef struct t _t;
struct s1 { _t *c; };
int test1(struct s1 *arg) { ... }
struct t { int a; int b; };
struct s2 { _t c; }
int test2(struct s2 *arg) { ... }
After processing test1(), among others, BPF backend generates BTF types for
"struct s1", "_t" and a placeholder for "struct t".
Note that "struct t" is not really generated. If later a direct access
to "struct t" member happened, "struct t" BTF type will be generated
properly.
During processing test2(), when processing member type "_t c",
BPF backend sees type "_t" already generated, so returned.
This caused the problem that "struct t" BTF type is never generated and
eventually causing incorrect type definition for "struct s2".
To fix the issue, during DebugInfo type traversal, even if a
typedef/const/volatile/restrict derived type has been recorded in BTF,
if it is not a type pruning candidate, type traversal of its base type continues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82041
The builtin function
u32 btf_type_id = __builtin_btf_type_id(param, 0)
can help preserve type info for the following use case:
extern void foo(..., void *data, int size);
int test(...) {
struct t { int a; int b; int c; } d;
d.a = ...; d.b = ...; d.c = ...;
foo(..., &d, sizeof(d));
}
The function "foo" in the above only see raw data and does not
know what type of the data is. In certain cases, e.g., logging,
the additional type information will help pretty print.
This patch handles the builtin in BPF backend. It includes
an IR pass to translate the IR intrinsic to a load of
a global variable which carries the metadata, and an MI
pass to remove the intermediate load of the global variable.
Finally, in AsmPrinter pass, proper instruction are generated.
In the above example, the second argument for __builtin_btf_type_id()
is 0, which means a relocation for local adjustment,
i.e., w.r.t. bpf program BTF change, will be generated.
The value 1 for the second argument means
a relocation for remote adjustment, e.g., against vmlinux.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74572
