The ppa2list section isn't really part of the ppa2 section. The ppa2list
section contains the offset to the ppa2, and must be created with a
special section name (specifically, C_@@QPPA2). The binder searches for
a section with this name, then uses this value to locate the ppa2.
In GOFF terms, these are entirely separate sections; the PPA2 section
isn't even really a section but rather belongs to the code section. On
the other hand, the ppa2list section is a section in its own right and
resides in a separate TXT record.
Implement the following assembly format flags, which are already
supported by GCC:
'A': On z14 or higher: If operand is a mem print the alignment
hint usable with vl/vst prefixed by a comma.
'O': print only the displacement of a memory reference or address.
'R': print only the base register of a memory reference or address.
Implement 'A' conservatively, since the memory operand alignment
information is not available for INLINEASM at the moment.
Most addresses in SystemZ instructions take two registers,
an index register and a base register. However, either of
those can be omitted. If there is just a single register,
this usually is taken as the base register - however, there
are certain rare cases where you specifically want to use
an index register but no base register. This is currently
not handled consistently by the assembler / disassembler.
Fix this by
- always emitting a dummy 0 as base register for index-
only addresses
- correctly handle dummy 0 as indicating no base register
when parsing an address
This is compatible with current GNU binutils behavior.
The function emitFunctionEntryLabel does not look at whether or not a function is a leaf when setting the entry flags, and instead blindly marks all functions as non-leaf routines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157701
Reviewed By: uweigand
The function emitFunctionEntryLabel does not look at whether or not a function is a leaf when setting the entry flags,
and instead blindly marks all functions as non-leaf routines. Change it to check if a function is a leaf function and
mark it accordingly.
This PR causes the PPA1 to emit the function's name if it exists. This field is not emitted for unnamed functions.
Reviewed By: uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157494
This patch adds support for the ADA (associated data area), doing the following:
-Creates the ADA table to handle displacements
-Emits the ADA section in the SystemZAsmPrinter
-Lowers the ADA_ENTRY node into the appropriate load instruction
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153788
- Creates the ADA table to handle displacements
- Emits the ADA section in the SystemZAsmPrinter
- Lowers the ADA_ENTRY node into the appropriate load instruction
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153788
In preparation for removing the `#include "llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h"`
from the header to source file of `llvm/Support/Error.h`, first add in
all the missing includes that were previously included transitively
through this header.
The Length/4 of Params field in the PPA1 ought to be the length of the parameters for the current function. Currently we are storing the length of the parameter area in the current function's stack frame, which represents the length of the params of the longest callee in the current function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152920
Reviewed By: uweigand
The Length/4 of Params field in the PPA1 ought to be the length of the parameters for the current function. Currently we are storing the length of the parameter area in the current function's stack frame, which represents the length of the params of the longest callee in the current function.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119049
Reviewed By: uweigand
This is a follow up to D141317 which extends the common code to include a target independent pseudo instruction. This is an alternative to (subset of) D92842 which tries to be as close to NFC as possible.
A couple things to call out.
* The test change in X86 is because we loose the scheduling information on the instruction. However, I think this was actually a bug in x86 since no instruction was emitted for a MEMBARRIER. Concluding that a meta instruction has latency just seems wrong?
* I intentionally left some parts of D92842 out. Specifically, several of the changes in the X86 code (data independence and outlining) appear functional, and likely worthy of their own review. Additionally, I'm not handling ARM/AArch64 at all. Those targets need the ordering whereas none of the others do. I want to get this in and tested before retrofitting in ordering to support those targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141408
On SystemZ, the vector ABI changes depending on the presence of hardware
vector support. Therefore, each binary compiled with a visible vector ABI
(e.g. one that calls an external function with a vector argument) should be
marked with a .gnu_attribute describing this.
Reviewed By: uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105067
This patch is essentially an alternative to https://reviews.llvm.org/D75836 and was mentioned by @lhames in a comment.
The gist of the issue is that Mach-O has restrictions on which kind of sections are allowed after debug info has been emitted, which is also properly asserted within LLVM. Problem is that stack maps are currently emitted as one of the last sections in each target-specific AsmPrinter so far, which would cause the assertion to trigger. The current approach of special casing for the `__LLVM_STACKMAPS` section is not viable either, as downstream users can overwrite the stackmap format using plugins, which may want to use different sections.
This patch fixes the issue by emitting the stack map earlier, right before debug info is emitted. The way this is implemented is by taking the choice when to emit the StackMap away from the target AsmPrinter and doing so in the base class. The only disadvantage of this approach is that the `StackMaps` member is now part of the base class, even for targets that do not support them. This is functionaly not a problem however, as emitting an empty `StackMaps` is a no-op.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132708
D25618 added a method to verify the instruction predicates for an
emitted instruction, through verifyInstructionPredicates added into
<Target>MCCodeEmitter::encodeInstruction. This is a very useful idea,
but the implementation inside MCCodeEmitter made it only fire for object
files, not assembly which most of the llvm test suite uses.
This patch moves the code into the <Target>_MC::verifyInstructionPredicates
method, inside the InstrInfo. The allows it to be called from other
places, such as in this patch where it is called from the
<Target>AsmPrinter::emitInstruction methods which should trigger for
both assembly and object files. It can also be called from other places
such as verifyInstruction, but that is not done here (it tends to catch
errors earlier, but in reality just shows all the mir tests that have
incorrect feature predicates). The interface was also simplified
slightly, moving computeAvailableFeatures into the function so that it
does not need to be called externally.
The ARM, AMDGPU (but not R600), AVR, Mips and X86 backends all currently
show errors in the test-suite, so have been disabled with FIXME
comments.
Recommitted with some fixes for the leftover MCII variables in release
builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129506
This reverts commit e2fb8c0f4b940e0285ee36c112469fa75d4b60ff as it does
not build for Release builds, and some buildbots are giving more warning
than I saw locally. Reverting to fix those issues.
D25618 added a method to verify the instruction predicates for an
emitted instruction, through verifyInstructionPredicates added into
<Target>MCCodeEmitter::encodeInstruction. This is a very useful idea,
but the implementation inside MCCodeEmitter made it only fire for object
files, not assembly which most of the llvm test suite uses.
This patch moves the code into the <Target>_MC::verifyInstructionPredicates
method, inside the InstrInfo. The allows it to be called from other
places, such as in this patch where it is called from the
<Target>AsmPrinter::emitInstruction methods which should trigger for
both assembly and object files. It can also be called from other places
such as verifyInstruction, but that is not done here (it tends to catch
errors earlier, but in reality just shows all the mir tests that have
incorrect feature predicates). The interface was also simplified
slightly, moving computeAvailableFeatures into the function so that it
does not need to be called externally.
The ARM, AMDGPU (but not R600), AVR, Mips and X86 backends all currently
show errors in the test-suite, so have been disabled with FIXME
comments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129506
This patch extends support for generating huge stack frames on 64-bit XPLINK by implementing the ABI-mandated call to the stack extension routine.
Reviewed By: uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120450
With XPLINK, a no-op with information about the call type is emitted
after each call instruction. Centralizing it has the advantage that it is
easy to document all cases, and it makes it easier to extend it later
(e.g. dynamic stack allocation, 32 bit mode).
Also add a test checking the call types emitted so far.
Reviewed By: uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119557
The XPLINK return `b 2(7)` has size 4 bytes, while the Linux return
`br 7` only has size 2 bytes. Thus a new alias is required to have correct
instruction byte count. It also fixes the conditional return code.
Reviewed By: uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119437
This patch adds support for symbolic displacements, e.g. like 'lg %r0,
sym(%r1)', which is done using relocations. This is needed to compile the
kernel without disabling the integrated assembler.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113341
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
SystemZ adds the EXRL target instructions in the end of each file. This must
be done before debug info emission since that may end the text section, and
therefore this is now done in emitConstantPools() (instead of in
emitEndOfAsmFile).
Review: Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109513
Don't use a local MachineOperand copy in SystemZAsmPrinter::PrintAsmOperand()
and change the register as it may break the MRI tracking of register
uses. Use an MCOperand instead.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105757
The odd register of a (128 bit) register pair is accessed with the 'N' code
with an inline assembly operand.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105502
Benchmarking has shown that it is worthwhile to implement a variable length
memset of 0 with XC (exclusive or) like gcc does, instead of using a libcall.
This requires the use of the EXecute Relative Long (EXRL) instruction which
can now be done in a framework that can also be used with other target
instructions (not just XC).
Review: Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103865
- This patch is the first part in enforcing prefix-less registers for the HLASM dialect in z/OS
- This patch removes the "%[r|f|v]" prefix while printing registers
- To achieve this, the `AssemblerDialect` field of MAI was used
- There is also a bit of refactoring done to ensure code repetition is reduced.
- Currently the LLVM assembler for SystemZ/z/OS accepts both prefixed registers and prefix-less registers. A subsequent follow-up patch will restrict the SystemZAsmParser to only accept prefix-less registers.
Crediting @kianm as an author as well.
Reviewed By: uweigand, abhina.sreeskantharajan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101308
This commit adds the initial changes to the SystemZ target
description for the XPLINK 64-bit calling convention on z/OS.
Additions include:
- a new predicate IsTargetXPLINK64
- different register allocation order
- generaton of nopr after a call
Reviewed-by: uweigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96887
Indirect sibling calls need to use %r1 to hold the target address.
This is currently hard-coded in many places. This is not only
unnecessary, but makes future changes in this area difficult.
This patch now encodes the target address as operand without
hard coding a register in most places throughout the MI back-end.
Code generation still always uses %r1, but this is now decided
solely in one place in SystemZTargetLowering::LowerCall.
NFC intended.
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jfb, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76925
