Changes the remark to emit on the function call that captures the globalized
variable instead of the globalized variable itself. The user should be able to
see which variable it was in the argument list of the function.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106980
To make usage easier (compared to the many reachability related AAs),
this patch introduces a helper API, `AA::isPotentiallyReachable`, which
performs all the necessary steps. It also does the "backwards"
reachability (see D106720) as that simplifies the AA a lot (backwards
queries were somewhat different from the other query resolvers), and
ensures we use cached values in every stage.
To test inter-procedural reachability in a reasonable way this patch
includes an extension to `AAPointerInfo::forallInterferingWrites`.
Basically, we can exclude writes if they cannot reach a load "during the
lifetime" of the allocation. That is, we need to go up the call graph to
determine reachability until we can determine the allocation would be
dead in the caller. This leads to new constant propagations (through
memory) in `value-simplify-pointer-info-gpu.ll`.
Note: The new code contains plenty debug output to determine how
reachability queries are resolved.
Parts extracted from D110078.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118673
D106720 introduced features that did not work properly as we could add
new queries after a fixpoint was reached and which could not be answered
by the information gathered up to the fixpoint alone.
As an alternative to D110078, which forced eager computation where we
want to continue to be lazy, this patch fixes the problem.
QueryAAs are AAs that allow lazy queries during their lifetime. They are
never fixed if they have no outstanding dependences and always run as
part of the updates in an iteration. To determine if we are done, all
query AAs are asked if they received new queries, if not, we only need
to consider updated AAs, as before. If new queries are present we go for
another iteration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118669
This patch implement instruction reachability for AAFunctionReachability
attribute. It is used to tell if a certain instruction can reach a function
transitively.
NOTE: I created a new commit based of D106720 and set the author back to
Kuter. Other metadata, etc. is wrong. I also addressed the
remaining review comments and fixed the unit test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106720
We missed out on AANoRecurse in the module pass because we had no call
graph. With AAFunctionReachability we can simply ask if the function may
reach itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110099
genericValueTraversal can look through arguments and allow value
simplification across function boundaries. In fact, the latter already
happened unchecked. With this change we allow the user of
genericValueTraversal to opt-out of interprocedural traversal if
required. We explicitly look through arguments now which helps to do
various things, incl. the propagation of constants into OpenMP parallel
regions (on the host).
We have two attributes that can answer readnone queries. While there is
a dependence between them, it seems best to not force the users to know
what AA to ask. The helpers also allow to check for readonly nicely.
Test changes show where we now deduce readnone but haven't before,
mostly because we only asked AAMemoryBehavior and not AAMemoryLocation.
AANoAlias has not been ported to the new API yet.
Since D104432 we can look through memory by analyzing all writes that
might interfere with a load. This patch provides some logic to exclude
writes that cannot interfere with a location, due to CFG reasoning.
We make sure to avoid multi-thread write-read situations properly while
we ignore writes that cannot reach a load or writes that will be
overwritten before the load is reached.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106397
No-sync is a property that we need in more places as complex
transformations emerge. To simplify the query we provide an
`AA::isNoSyncInst` helper now and expose two existing helpers through
the `AANoSync` class.
This relies on existing APIs and avoids accessing the pointer
element type. The alternative would be to extend getPointerOperand()
to also return the accessed type, but I figured going through
MemoryLocation would be cleaner.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117868
The old method to avoid unconstrained expansion of the constant range in
a loop did not work as soon as there were multiple instructions in
between the phi and its input. We now take a generic approach and limit
the number of updates as a fallback. The old method is kept as it
catches "the common case" early.
AAPointerInfo currently bails on constant expression GEPs with
notional overindexing. I don't think this is necessary, as the
following code handling GEPOperator will deal with arbitrary
indices appropriately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117203
This completes removal of the isXLike queries, and depends on a whole series of earlier patches which have already landed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117242
The basic idea is that we can parameterize the getObjectSize implementation with a callback which lets us replace the operand before analysis if desired. This is what Attributor is doing during it's abstract interpretation, and allows us to have one copy of the code.
Note this is not NFC for two reasons:
* The existing attributor code is wrong. (Well, this is under-specified to be honest, but at least inconsistent.) The intermediate math needs to be done in the index type of the pointer space. Imagine e.g. i64 arguments in a 32 bit address space.
* I did not preserve the behavior in getAPInt where we return 0 for a partially analyzed value. This looks simply wrong in the original code, and nothing test wise contradicts that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117241
The existing code duplicated the same concern in two places, and (weirdly) changed the inference of the allocation size based on whether we could meet the alignment requirement. Instead, just directly check the allocation requirement.
Rewrite the calloc specific handling in heap-to-stack to allow arbitrary init values. The basic problem being solved is that if an allocation is initilized to anything other than zero, this must be explicitly done for the formed alloca as well.
This covers the calloc case today, but once a couple of earlier guards are removed in this code, downstream allocators with other init values could also be handled.
Inspired by discussion on D116971
If we look at potentially interfering accesses we need to ensure the
"IsExact" flag is set appropriately. Accesses that have an "unknown"
size or offset cannot be exact matches and we missed to flag that.
Error and test reported by Serguei N. Dmitriev.
We currently have two similar implementations of this concept:
isNoAliasCall() only checks for the noalias return attribute.
isNoAliasFn() also checks for allocation functions.
We should switch to only checking the attribute. SLC is responsible
for inferring the noalias return attribute for non-new allocation
functions (with a missing case fixed in
348bc76e35).
For new, clang is responsible for setting the attribute,
if -fno-assume-sane-operator-new is not passed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116800
If we have multiple references into a map we need to ensure the ones
created late do not invalidate the ones created early. To do that we
need to make sure all but the first are not modifying the map, hence
for them the keys have to be present already.
Fixes#52875.
AAPointerInfo, and thereby other places, can look already through
internal global and stack memory. This patch enables them to look
through heap memory returned by functions with a `noalias` return.
In the future we can look through `noalias` arguments as well but that
will require AAIsDead to learn that such memory can be inspected by the
caller later on. We also need teach AAPointerInfo about dominance to
actually deal with memory that might not be `null` or `undef`
initialized. D106397 is a first step in that direction already.
Reviewed By: kuter
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109170
While we skipped uses in stores if we can find all copies of the value
when the memory is loaded, we did not correlate the use in the store
with the use in the load. So far this lead to less precise results in the
offset calculations which prevented deductions. With the new
EquivalentUseCB callback argument the user of checkForAllUses can be
informed of the correlation and act on it appropriately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109662
This patch changes the HeapToStack optimization to attach the return alignment
attribute information to the created alloca instruction. This would cause
problems when replacing the heap allocation with an alloca did not respect the
alignment of the original heap allocation, which would typically be aligned on
an 8 or 16 byte boundary. Malloc calls now contain alignment attributes,
so we can use that information here.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115888
Instead of using the ArgumentPromotion implementation, we now walk
call sites using checkForAllCallSites() and directly call
areTypesABICompatible() using the replacement types. I believe
that resolves the TODO in the code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116033
This patch introduces a new abstract attributor instance that propagates
assumption information from functions. Conceptually, if a function is
only called by functions that have certain assumptions, then we can
apply the same assumptions to that function. This problem is similar to
calculating the dominator set, but the assumptions are merged instead of
nodes.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111054
As noted in https://reviews.llvm.org/D90924#inline-1076197
apparently this is a pretty common pattern,
let's not repeat it yet again, but have it in a common place.
There may be some more places where it could be used,
but these are the most obvious ones.
Even if we look for `nocapture` we need to bail on escaping pointers.
The crucial thing is that we might not look at a big enough scope when
we derive the memory behavior. Thus, it might be `nocapture` in a larger
context while it is "captured" in a smaller context.
When we strip and accumulate constant offsets we need to pick the right
address space such that the offset APInt has the right bit width.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112544
Currently strip.invariant/launder.invariant are handled by
constructing constant expressions with the intrinsics skipped.
This takes an alternative approach of accumulating the offset
using stripAndAccumulateConstantOffsets(), with a flag to look
through invariant.group intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112382
Make use of the getGEPIndicesForOffset() helper for creating GEPs.
This handles arrays as well, uses correct GEP index types and
reduces code duplication.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112263
Stop using APInt constructors and methods that were soft-deprecated in
D109483. This fixes all the uses I found in llvm, except for the APInt
unit tests which should still test the deprecated methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110807
This patch fixes a error made in 2cc6f7c8e108. That patch
added a call site position but there was a small error with the way
the presence of a unknown call edge was being propagated from call site
to function. This patch fixes that error. This error was effecting some
AMDGPU tests.
This patch makes it possible to query callbase reachability
(Can a callbase reach a function Fn transitively).
The patch moves the reachability query handling logic to a member class,
this class will have more users within the AA once we add other function
reachability queries.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106402
This patch adds a call site position for AACallEdges, this
allows us to ask questions about which functions a specific
`CallBase` might call.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106208
