8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song
9e9907f1cf
[AMDGPU,test] Change llc -march= to -mtriple= (#75982)
Similar to 806761a7629df268c8aed49657aeccffa6bca449.

For IR files without a target triple, -mtriple= specifies the full
target triple while -march= merely sets the architecture part of the
default target triple, leaving a target triple which may not make sense,
e.g. amdgpu-apple-darwin.

Therefore, -march= is error-prone and not recommended for tests without
a target triple. The issue has been benign as we recognize
$unknown-apple-darwin as ELF instead of rejecting it outrightly.

This patch changes AMDGPU tests to not rely on the default
OS/environment components. Tests that need fixes are not changed:

```
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fabs.f64.ll
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fabs.ll
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/floor.ll
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fneg-fabs.f64.ll
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/fneg-fabs.ll
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/r600-infinite-loop-bug-while-reorganizing-vector.ll
  LLVM :: CodeGen/AMDGPU/schedule-if-2.ll
```
2024-01-16 21:54:58 -08:00
Matt Arsenault
fae05692a3 CodeGen: Print/parse LLTs in MachineMemOperands
This will currently accept the old number of bytes syntax, and convert
it to a scalar. This should be removed in the near future (I think I
converted all of the tests already, but likely missed a few).

Not sure what the exact syntax and policy should be. We can continue
printing the number of bytes for non-generic instructions to avoid
test churn and only allow non-scalar types for generic instructions.

This will currently print the LLT in parentheses, but accept parsing
the existing integers and implicitly converting to scalar. The
parentheses are a bit ugly, but the parser logic seems unable to deal
without either parentheses or some keyword to indicate the start of a
type.
2021-06-30 16:54:13 -04:00
Stanislav Mekhanoshin
3bffb1cd0e [AMDGPU] Use single cache policy operand
Replace individual operands GLC, SLC, and DLC with a single cache_policy
bitmask operand. This will reduce the number of operands in MIR and I hope
the amount of code. These operands are mostly 0 anyway.

Additional advantage that parser will accept these flags in any order unlike
now.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96469
2021-03-15 13:00:59 -07:00
Stanislav Mekhanoshin
a8d9d50762 [AMDGPU] gfx90a support
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96906
2021-02-17 16:01:32 -08:00
Matt Arsenault
4b4496312e AMDGPU: Start adding MODE register uses to instructions
This is the groundwork required to implement strictfp. For now, this
should be NFC for regular instructoins (many instructions just gain an
extra use of a reserved register). Regalloc won't rematerialize
instructions with reads of physical registers, but we were suffering
from that anyway with the exec reads.

Should add it for all the related FP uses (possibly with some
extras). I did not add it to either the gpr index mode instructions
(or every single VALU instruction) since it's a ridiculous feature
already modeled as an arbitrary side effect.

Also work towards marking instructions with FP exceptions. This
doesn't actually set the bit yet since this would start to change
codegen. It seems nofpexcept is currently not implied from the regular
IR FP operations. Add it to some MIR tests where I think it might
matter.
2020-05-27 14:47:00 -04:00
Stanislav Mekhanoshin
a6322941ff [AMDGPU] gfx1010 VMEM and SMEM implementation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61330

llvm-svn: 359621
2019-04-30 22:08:23 +00:00
Puyan Lotfi
43e94b15ea Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil.
Discussed here:

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html

In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.

llvm-svn: 323922
2018-01-31 22:04:26 +00:00
Stanislav Mekhanoshin
949fac9e40 [AMDGPU] Fix shouldClusterMemOps to process flat loads
Flat loads do not have vdata operand but have vdst instead.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37502

llvm-svn: 312640
2017-09-06 15:31:30 +00:00